Need Help With This Assignment?

Let Our Team of Professional Writers Write a PLAGIARISM-FREE Paper for You!

SUBMIT YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Nursing, Pages: 3

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1- IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1 – IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Castillo, E. G. (2019). Community interventions to promote mental health and social equity. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1017-0

 

 

 Lu, W., Todhunter-Reid, A., Mitsdarffer, M. L., Muñoz-Laboy, M., Yoon, A. S., & Xu, L. (2021). Barriers and Facilitators for Mental Health Service Use Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Literature. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641605 Jimenez, D. E., Park, M., Rosen, D., Joo, J. hui, Garza, D. M., Weinstein, E. R., Conner, K., Silva, C., & Okereke, O. (2022). Centering Culture in Mental Health: Differences in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Access to Care Among Older People of Color. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2022.07.001 Jörns-Presentati, A., Napp, A.-K., Dessauvagie, A. S., Stein, D. J., Jonker, D., Breet, E., Charles, W., Swart, R. L., Lahti, M., Suliman, S., Jansen, R., van den Heuvel, L. L., Seedat, S., & Groen, G. (2021). The prevalence of mental health problems in sub-Saharan adolescents: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0251689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251689
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) This article was selected for its thorough analysis of current community initiatives that promote social fairness and mental health. The under- or overdiagnosis of mental health illnesses among minority youth and their subsequent treatment is a pressing clinical concern, and this is directly related to that issue. The article’s discussion of the significance of tackling socioeconomic determinants of health and cultivating fair partnerships is in line with the ethical considerations of research in this field, including the need to be inclusive, culturally sensitive, and actively involve the community (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).

 

 This study was selected for its thorough assessment of the factors that encourage and discourage racial/ethnic minority teenagers in the US to seek mental health services, which is directly related to the clinical problem at hand. This work is in line with research ethics principles, such as acknowledging the significance of culturally competent treatments and the distinct experiences and obstacles encountered by minority groups (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). This article was selected for its focus on the racial disparities in mental health diagnosis, treatment, and access to care among older persons of colour. This is a clinical issue that is relevant to our research because it addresses the under- or misdiagnosis of mental health disorders and treatments for minority populations. Addressing structural racism and encouraging cultural sensitivity are two examples of ethical principles in research that the paper follows (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023) via its antiracist and health equality focus. This article was selected for its systematic evaluation on the incidence of mental health issues among teenagers in sub-Saharan Africa. The clinical issue of interest is the diagnosis and treatment of mental health disorders among minority communities, and the review is pertinent to that topic. Ethical issues in research, such as the promotion of equal access to mental health care, are in line with the study’s findings, which recognise the vulnerability of adolescent populations, especially in low- and middle-income countries (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).
Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article In this review article, the main aim was to examine some of the recent literature on community interventions geared towards promoting mental health and social equity across several topic areas like collaborative care, early psychosis, school-based interventions, homelessness, criminal justice, global mental health and mental health promotion/prevention. The objective of these authors’ study was to ascertain what these community interventions were by using the social-ecological model for health promotion (Castillo, 2019). The main objective of this systematic review was to integrate results from previous studies on determinants of mental health service utilization among ethnic/racial minority adolescents in the USA. In order to identify obstacles and enablers, the authors focused on different levels covered by socio-ecological framework such as individual, parent, therapist, context/structure, and social/cultural factors (Lu et al., 2021). The main purpose of this review paper was to analyze the different requirements for African American or Black, Asian American, and Latino populations in relation to mental health diagnosis, treatment, and access to care. The authors wanted to look into how these diverse groups’ cultural backgrounds, as well as psychosocial factors, contribute to their response to therapy, hence developing an approach that would be sensitive to people from culturally diverse backgrounds. The major objective of this evaluation was to compile data on the frequency of mental health issues among 10–19-year-olds in sub-Saharan African nations from epidemiological studies that were published between 2008 and 2020 (Jörns-Presentati et al., 2021).

 
Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. This article is a literature review utilizing a qualitative methodology to synthesize and analyze findings from various research studies and interventions related to community-based mental health promotion and social equity (Castillo, 2019). The authors conducted a systematic search and evaluation of relevant literature, following established guidelines for conducting literature reviews.

 

 

 

 

 This study applied a quantitative approach, or rather, it used the systematic review method. Furthermore, the authors conformed to PRISMA guidelines, and they searched seven databases to look for peer-reviewed articles that addressed mental health service use barriers and facilitators among adolescents from racial/ethnic minority communities (Lu et al., 2021). The article used a narrative review approach as its qualitative methodology. The authors examined and combined previous research findings and literature that pertained to ethnic-racial disparities in mental health and cultural issues affecting elderly persons of color while adopting an anti-racist, health equity standpoint (Jimenez et al., 2022). The study is based on a quantitative research design and particularly employs a systematic review of observational epidemiological studies. This systematic search was conducted in multiple databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar) as recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewer’s Manual for systematic reviews (Jörns Presentati et al., 2021). The study considered prevalence outcomes among adolescents aged 10-19 years using either clinical interviews or standardized questionnaires to assess psychopathology while excluding clinical samples.
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. The use of qualitative literature review methodology in this article enables an extensive consolidation and scrutiny of results from several studies and interventions on community-based mental health promotion and social equity. The study is valuable because the author has used the social-ecological framework to provide a comprehensive knowledge of how community interventions are carried out at all scales, from the individual to institutions that make policy. This method improves the robustness and dependability of the review through consideration of multiple influences on mental health outcomes. Furthermore, it can also be noted that putting the focus on the involvement of communities, addressing structural determinants of mental health, and intersectoral collaboration concurs with ethical principles such as inclusivity and cultural sensitivity, which further enhances trustworthiness in research output. The choice of systematic review as a methodology in this study helps to adopt a thorough and best-practice approach in the synthesis of existing literature on barriers and facilitators to the utilization of mental health services among racially/ethnically diverse adolescents. Therefore, the authors build the reliability and reproducibility of their work by adhering to the guidelines laid down in the PRISMA checklist. In addition to this, the general search strategy in different databases and the rigorous application of inclusion and exclusion criteria reduce the chances of bias selection, thus enhancing the validity of the review. Furthermore, the socio-ecological model adopted in this study enables an examination of mental health service use from different levels of factors making it easier to generate broad-based results that would be applicable to different communities. The application of the narrative review methodology in this article makes it possible to critically discuss the outstanding issue of mental health disparities for older people of color and its cultural implications in detail. Using racist and health equity perspectives, the authors ensure the credibility and ethical integrity of the submitted findings because they work with the systemic issues of bias and inequality affecting minorities. Therefore, findings enhance practical utilization and relevance by including specific cultural adaptations, models of care, and strategies in the article constructs. Additionally, drawing on literature from different fields enhances the credibility of the authors and the scope of the presented study. The systematic review approach offers a scientific and sequential framework to obtain the current body of literature on MHP among working adolescents in SSA. Consequently, the authors abide by the identified guidelines provided by the JBI Reviewer’s Manual and engage in a systematic and rigorous search of the databases, thus guaranteeing a reliable and relevant extraction of papers. The use of both clinical interviews and standardized questionnaires for assessing psychopathology adds to the general reliability and validity of the findings. On the same note, I agree with the assertions that the alignment to a particular age group (10-19 years) and geographical area (sub-Saharan Africa) of the study offers a more focused approach to handling the identified problem (Jörns-Presentati et al., 2021).
General Notes/Comments This comprehensive literature review explores community interventions aimed at promoting mental health and social equity, which is highly relevant to the clinical issue of interest. The author emphasizes the importance of addressing social determinants of health and fostering equitable partnerships, aligning with ethical considerations in research such as inclusivity, cultural sensitivity, and community engagement (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023; Varkey, 2021). The review highlights the need for ongoing resources, training, and policy reform to support sustainable healthcare-community collaborations (Castillo, 2019).

 

 

 

 

 

 Adolescents from racial and ethnic minority groups in the US have unique challenges when trying to access mental health services, and this systematic study seeks to identify those challenges as well as those opportunities. The writers acknowledge that minority communities have distinct experiences and difficulties, and they stress the need for treatments that are sensitive to cultural norms (Lu et al., 2021; Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023). The use of the socio-ecological framework provides a multi-level analysis, offering a holistic understanding of the issue (Lu et al., 2021; Terry, 2018). This narrative review highlights disparities in mental health diagnosis, treatment, and access to care among older people of color directly related to the clinical issue of interest. The authors adopt an antiracist and health equity lens, aligning with ethical considerations such as addressing systemic racism and promoting cultural sensitivity (Jimenez et al., 2022; Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023; Varkey, 2021). The article provides valuable insights for developing culturally sensitive interventions and practical strategies (Jimenez et al., 2022; Suskie, 2018). This study takes a look at how common mental health issues are among teenagers in sub-Saharan Africa, which is important for the clinical challenge at hand, which is how to diagnose and treat depression in minority groups. According to Jörns-Presentati et al. (2021) and Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2023), the authors recognize that teenagers, especially in countries with low or medium income, are more susceptible. They also agree with ethical concerns, such as the need to promote equal access to mental health care. According to Jörns-Presentati et al. (2021) and Terry (2018), the results are more reliable and valid because of the rigorous approach, which includes following set rules and doing a thorough search.

References

Castillo, E. G. (2019). Community interventions to promote mental health and social equity. Current Psychiatry Reports, 21(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1017-0

Jimenez, D. E., Park, M., Rosen, D., Joo, J. hui, Garza, D. M., Weinstein, E. R., Conner, K., Silva, C., & Okereke, O. (2022). Centering Culture in Mental Health: Differences in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Access to Care Among Older People of Color. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2022.07.001

Jörns-Presentati, A., Napp, A.-K., Dessauvagie, A. S., Stein, D. J., Jonker, D., Breet, E., Charles, W., Swart, R. L., Lahti, M., Suliman, S., Jansen, R., van den Heuvel, L. L., Seedat, S., & Groen, G. (2021). The prevalence of mental health problems in sub-Saharan adolescents: A systematic review. PLOS ONE, 16(5), e0251689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251689

Lu, W., Todhunter-Reid, A., Mitsdarffer, M. L., Muñoz-Laboy, M., Yoon, A. S., & Xu, L. (2021). Barriers and Facilitators for Mental Health Service Use Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Literature. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.641605

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Suskie, L. (2018). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Terry, A. J. (2018). Clinical research for the doctor of nursing practice (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Varkey, B. (2021). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 

To Prepare:
• Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. (Mental Health – The mis/underdiagnosing of Mental health disorders/treatments for adolescents and young adult minorities.

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1- IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1- IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

• Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
• Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
• Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
• The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
• A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
• A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
• A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
• A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.