Need Help With This Assignment?

Let Our Team of Professional Writers Write a PLAGIARISM-FREE Paper for You!

SUBMIT YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Business, Article critique

You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Cant Make Him Edit

You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Cant Make Him Edit

Write a 250-500-word summary of the article that includes paraphrases of the article, the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.

Communication is vital in all aspects of people’s lives, be it formal or informal. Additionally, there are various ways of communicating, such as oral and written communication. Under various circumstances, individuals are required to use various forms of communication to converse. Moreover, communication is vital in everyday life; therefore, skills must be gathered to perfect all forms of communication. For written communication, grammatical errors are avoided when presenting a written form of communication perfectly. In businesses, written communication is vital in business documents and presentations, and consequently, business students should acquire written communication and editing skills to participate in an organization effectively. Therefore, different techniques are used to help students reduce their grammatical errors, such as written feedback. Thus,  research was conducted to test its effectiveness in the article “You Can Lead a Horse to Water, but You Can’t Make Him Edit: Varied Effects of Feedback on Grammar across Upper-Division Business Students.”

Following complaints about the lack of college business students’ written communication skills, research was conducted to test the effectiveness of using written feedback to reduce grammatical errors, thereby improving writing skills. Therefore, the question to be answered by the research was, “Can feedback about writing mechanics in this coursework effectively increase business students’ skill levels in grammar?” Subsequently, various methods were put in place for the study.

The methods include assigning two assignments to test before the treatment assessment of the student’s confidence, attitudes, behaviors, and experience in writing. These assessments depend on the hypothesis that these factors influence the efficiency of written feedback. The results indicated that grammatical errors reduced the more the students wrote and edited their drafts before submitting them. Accordingly, correlations were confirmed between the factors considered during the assessment and the ability to acquire and improve writing skills.

However, these results showed a discrepancy between the first and second assignments, with the second assignment having better results. Accordingly, despite their confidence and other attributes in correcting errors, the students’ correction of errors was insignificant. Illustrating that more student errors resulted in an inability to provide the necessary response; thus, errors weren’t corrected. Hence, the hypothesis of the study wasn’t supported.

References

Wilson,, T., Provaznik, W. and Pigeon, N., 2018. You Can Lead a Horse to Water, but You Can’t Make Him Edit: Varied Effects of Feedback on Grammar across Upper-Division Business Students. Journal of the Academy of Business Education 

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 

UNV-504 – Article Review

Article Review

To complete this assignment, use “You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Can’t Make Him Edit: Varied Effects of Feedback on Grammar across Upper-Division Business Students” and the guidelines for writing in the topic study materials.

You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Cant Make Him Edit

You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Cant Make Him Edit

Write a 250-500-word summary of the article that includes paraphrases of the article, the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Reminder: This is an academic exercise that should not be written in first person. This is an APA paper that includes a separate title page and a reference page.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Materials if you need assistance.

Read “You Can Lead a Horse to Water but You Can’t Make Him Edit: Varied Effects of Feedback on Grammar across Upper-Division Business Students” by Wilson, Provazik, and Pigeon, in the Journal of the Academy of Business Education (2018).

URL:

Article Review Rubric

Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
UNV-504-O501 Article Review 150.0
Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
60.0%
30.0% Summary of the article is insufficient or not present. Guidelines were not followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials. Summary of the article is unclearly written. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials, but summary is incomplete or rudimentary. Summary of the article is written clearly with paraphrases. Guidelines were sufficiently followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials. Summary of the article is written clearly and academically with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials in an academic manner. Summary of the article is written clearly, thoroughly, and academically with paraphrases. Guidelines were followed for writing as presented in the topic study materials in an academic manner. Summary demonstrates a solid understanding of academic writing.
30.0% Summary does not present the research problem, questions, method, findings, and/or implications discussed by the authors. Summary presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications, but explanation is insufficient or rudimentary. Summary sufficiently presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors. Summary presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications discussed by the authors in an academic manner. Summary thoroughly presents the research problem, questions, method, findings, and implications in an academic manner. Summary demonstrates a solid understanding of the overall concept made by the author.
40.0%
10.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
10.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0% Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
10.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.