The Need for New Federal Regulations for Data Collection in Tech Companies

The Need for New Federal Regulations for Data Collection in Tech Companies

In the present digital age, data gathering is a key driver for innovation in technology and an essential aspect of organizational management. However, the current system of regulations that control the data collection by the tech firms is inadequate to preserve the consumers’ privacy and control for the more dubious practices. Technological advancements have advanced at an alarming rate, and the legislation designed to protect data has been left far behind. This lack of regulation threatens privacy, data protection, and market equality, which means there is a need to establish new federal rules rather than going with enforcement only. For example, in 2017, the Equifax data breach raised the risks posed by archaic regulations and the lack of strong harmonized laws protecting consumers from negligent technological actions. This is why more strict legislation on the Federal level is required to regulate the segment’s tendencies and safeguard the buyer, encourage fair market competition, and develop sensible and reasonable technologies.

The Inadequacy of Current Regulations

The weakness of modern legislation on the protection of data collection laws can be described by an increased rate of leakages and the gravity of consequences for millions of consumers at high risk of identity theft and other forms of fraud. For instance, the attack on Equifax that resulted in the personal data of 147 million consumers disclosed vulnerabilities within the United States legal system (Alharbi, 2020). This case brought out the inadequacy of the current legislation in enforcing organizational proper implementation of security procedures on the data they receive and process. Present laws encompassing technology are sectoral, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines. Furthermore, they act as more of a damage control instead of providing consumer protection before consumers’ data are breached. Many tech companies can, therefore, engage in minimal regulation since oversight mechanisms in the current world are comparatively very weak and do not enforce stringent data protection measures.

On the other hand, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides examples of what effective comprehensive data protection laws entail. Under the GDPR, there are strict requirements for user consent before data collection, robust security protocols such as encryption, and even hefty fines in case of non-compliance (Voigt & Von dem Bussche, 2017). This has effectively forced companies to take better care of their customers’ data. Because of this lack of legislation in the United States, a huge vacuum in regulation has been created that exposes consumers to data breaches and abuse. Such an environment is fostered by the general laxity in enforcement by the FTC, coupled with the fact that no routine audits are conducted, which allows data security to take a backseat and not be treated as an issue of paramount importance.

The Case for New Federal Regulations

New federal regulations are needed because the current legal framework governing data collection is inherently deficient. The pace and level of data collection today are beyond the capacity of these laws to tackle effectively. Social media, e-commerce sites, and mobile apps reap personal data on a massive scale to feed targeted advertising, machine learning algorithms, and political campaigns. These are often shrouded in darkness, with little transparency or accountability. Current laws prove incapable of covering these new realities, leaving wide gaps in consumer protection. The new regulations will have to ensure more vigilance in matters of security and more transparency and accountability in data collection, storage, and use.

The special aspects in which new regulations are required include the issue of data monopolization by big tech companies. Giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon enjoy unparalleled control over personal information, raising concerns over privacy, competition, and possible misuse of data (Khan, 2020). Through such markets, the level of data being acquired by such firms will mouse over, monopolizing data, stifling innovation, and setting up high barriers to entry for other, smaller competitors. New federal regulations need to be centered on breaking up these monopolies by insisting on data-sharing protocols that would help equalize the field. For instance, large technology companies could be compelled to share their anonymized data sets with smaller firms to spark innovation and competition but in a way that still protects privacy.

More than that, the ethical treatment of consumer data should be at the heart of new regulations. The current regulatory landscape is too focused on compliance and very little on ethics. As technology becomes more and more part of everyday life, companies, in a very serious way, need to create ethical frameworks where consumer well-being comes before profit maximization. New federal laws should allow for ethical audits where tech companies are rated on the standard of security and responsible use of data (Floridi & Taddeo, 2016). That could add guidelines on data minimization—firms gathering just the data needed for their operations—and strict restrictions on sharing with third parties.

Challenges in Implementing New Regulations

Although the new federal regulations are rather obviously necessary, there are difficulties in their implementation. The most crucial of them is the expected objections from tech companies. For years, they have argued that more regulation slows down innovation; therefore, they have always objected to further regulation. Often, the tech giants fight against stricter laws and regulations, claiming the need for agility within such a rapidly changing technological space (Srinivasan, 2019). The argument assumes that uncontrolled innovation might bring several harms: violation of privacy and monopolistic practices. Indeed, policymakers must balance the need for innovation and the need to protect consumers while ensuring a fair marketplace. That is something in which politics will have to be combined with the collaboration of lawmakers, tech companies, and consumer advocacy groups to create an effective adaptive regulatory regime in light of such fast-moving technology.

Another problem is that data collection is global. Many technology companies are cross-border; this makes it extremely hard to enforce regulations at a national level effectively. For instance, a United States-based firm may collect data on individuals living in Europe; under these conditions, the firm will fall subject to the GDPR. However, should the firm fail to comply, it becomes tricky to enforce. Any new federal legislation should provide for international cooperation and data governance. The United States can collaborate with other countries to come up with a uniform framework for data protection, just like the GDPR, and have every company, irrespective of their place of operation or incorporation, adhere to the same. That way, there will be a consistent and more adequate setting of data security at a global level.

The Benefits of Comprehensive Data Regulations

Comprehensive data regulations would protect consumers and promote a more healthy and competitive tech industry. More stringent regulation would force companies to improve their security against data breaches, reducing their incidence and costs. According to an IBM study, the average cost of a data breach this year hit $3.86 million, which includes lost business, associated legal fees, and reputational damage. Thus, with improved security practices, companies can reduce these costs and increase trust among their customers.

This would further spur innovation by evening out the playing field for smaller tech companies. If big companies are made to work to higher ethical standards or even compelled to share their data, then small companies can offer their products on more equal terms. This would bring about a far more dynamic and heterogeneous technology industry in which startups and smaller companies, not just the giants, drive innovation with fresh ideas and perspectives.

Subsequently, this would finally lead to broad data regulations to help regain public trust in the tech industry. Recent scandals like the one at Cambridge Analytica have shaken consumer confidence in how companies treat their data. As such, through tighter regulation, the government can prevent an erosion of trust and make companies liable for ethical breaches to assure the public that their privacy is safeguarded. This would not only help the consumers but also improve the reputation of the tech industry and foster a better relationship between the companies and their users.

Conclusion

The regulatory framework that exists at the moment for the collection of data by tech companies is far inadequate in terms of protection given to consumer privacy and projecting ethical practices. It is simply that the real revolution in technology has outrun the creation of legislation that would protect sensitive data, bringing risks to consumers and the market in general. There is a need for new federal regulations to address the following: strengthening data security, preventing monopolization, and ethical use of data. While implementation of such regulations will be difficult, the benefits are evident: better consumer protection, more marketplace competition, and regained public trust in the tech sector. By enacting comprehensive federal legislation in this vein, the United States can ensure that the digital future will be innovative and secure.

References

Alharbi, F. S. (2020). Dealing with data breaches amidst changes in technology. International Journal of Computer Science and Security (IJCSS), 14(3), 108-115.

Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M. (2016). What is data ethics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083), 20160360.

Khan, L. M. (2020). The separation of platforms and commerce. Columbia Law Review, 119(4), 973–1098.

Srinivasan, D. (2019). The antitrust case against Facebook: A monopolist’s journey towards pervasive surveillance in spite of consumers’ preference for privacy. Berkeley Bus. LJ, 16, 39.

Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU general data protection regulation (GDP). A Practical Guide, 1st Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 10(3152676), 10-5555.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

The laws for tech companies to be innovative and groundbreaking using data collection are not strict enough, so instead of enforcing the current regulations, we need to create new federal regulations.

The Need for New Federal Regulations for Data Collection in Tech Companies

Instructions

This assignment is a full draft of your Argument Research Essay. This draft will demonstrate the argument and writing techniques studied in the course and will build upon the steps you have taken in all the previous weeks toward developing your Argument Research Essay. This draft is expected to meet all of the Argument Research Essay requirements for writing, content, length, and sources.