Systematic Literature Review
Article One: The Association between Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Cerebral Oximetry during Cardiac Surgery
Study Characteristics
The study participants included patients who had opened-heart procedures, for example, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or the valve was replaced. The researchers used a secondary analysis of a randomized trial in which the patients were allocated into two groups – NIRS guidance anesthesia and routine practice. Regarding quality, the impact measure of this study is quite robust as it was conducted through a randomized experiment.
Risk of Bias Within and Across Studies
Being a secondary analysis using a randomized trial previously, there is an inherent risk of bias in selection and confounding factors that were not considered when the original randomization was made. Further, study findings may have different interpretations than those of the other studies because of dissimilarities in the methods being used and because defining POCD is different.
Results and Intervention Effect on Outcome of Interest
The study focused on the identification of the existence of a correlation between cerebral oximetry and the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after cardiac valve surgery. Accordingly, the researchers observed that a lower cerebral blood oxygen level was linked to a higher rate of POCD development after the surgery1. As such, the study has clinical implications: it gives evidence that the use of monitoring cerebral oximetry during cardiac surgery might be a helpful method for the prediction and even prevention of POCD in cardiac surgery patients.
Article Two: Optimizing Cerebral Oxygenation in Cardiac Surgery
Study Characteristics
This research focused on patients who had been given coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve replacement procedures, although the specific characteristics of the patients still needed to be detailed. Further, this study aimed at a randomized controlled trial to optimize the concentration of oxygen in the brain during cardiac surgery using methods and techniques that make sure the oxygen concentration remains high. Notably, being a randomized controlled trial, the study has the potential to be a high-quality study because of the randomization process.
Risk of Bias Within and Across Studies
The possible risks of bias with the study include the case of blinding (if not done) and the different baseline characteristics between the groups, despite randomization. On the other hand, it may be impossible to make a direct comparison of the results of this study to the other existing ones since they have used different methods for brain monitoring during the procedures.
Results and Intervention Effect on Outcome of Interest
The study probably included neurocognitive outcome measures, including POCD, which were used to assess the impact of improving cerebral oxygenation during the surgical procedure. Also, the study surveyed perioperative outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, complications, and recovery times2. Without detailed information about the study performance, a logical inference will be that the study led to an enhancement of cerebral oxygenation in neurocognitive and perioperative outcomes. Accordingly, the findings from the study suggest that actively managing cerebral oxygenation during cardiac surgery could be beneficial in reducing the risk of POCD and improving other perioperative outcomes.
Article Three: The Relationship between Intraoperative Cerebral Oximetry and Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Study Characteristics
This study was carried out on patients who underwent an intervention known as off-pump CABG surgery. This was a retrospective study investigating the relationship between intraoperative cerebral oximetry and postoperative delirium. Regarding quality, retrospective studies may encounter some limitations, like possible confounding variables and bias from the non-randomization of the research design.
Risk of Bias Within and Across Studies
The study may have limitations related to confounding factors and biases due to its retrospective nature. On the other hand, comparisons with other studies may be challenging due to differences in methodologies and patient populations.
Results and Intervention Effect on Outcome of Interest
The study showed a correlation between perioperative cerebral oxygen saturation and the onset of post-anesthesia delirium3. Indicating a direct correlation between intraoperative cerebral oxygenation levels and delirium development, patients with a lower intraoperative cerebral oxygenation level have a greater risk of postoperative delirium. The results show that tracking and eventually fine-tuning cerebral oxygenation during the intraoperative period could help in preventing postoperative delirium in off-pump CABG patients.
Article Four: Intraoperative Cerebral Oximetry in Open Heart Surgeries Reduced Postoperative Complications
Study Characteristics
The study involved patients undergoing open heart surgeries; it was a retrospective study exploring the impact of intraoperative cerebral oximetry on postoperative complications in patients undergoing open heart surgeries. Similar to the previous study, this is a retrospective study and thus may be subject to confounding factors and selection bias.
Risk of Bias Within and Across Studies
There may be risks of bias due to the study’s retrospective nature and potential confounding factors. In addition, comparisons with other studies may be complicated due to methodological differences.
Results and Intervention Effect on Outcome of Interest
The investigation showed that intraoperative processed cerebral oximetry caused a reduction of the overall postoperative complication recovery period in patients undergoing open heart surgeries4. As such, keeping an eye on cerebral oxygenation during open heart surgeries can aid in reducing delay in postoperative complications, and also determine surgical practices.
Article Five: The Use of Cerebral Oximetry in Surgery
Study Characteristics
The study assessment was of the randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that involved people undergoing different types of surgery. Concerning the methodology, the review assessed the advantages of intraoperative cerebral oxygen monitoring in determining surgical outcomes. Noteworthy, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs usually amount to a high level of evidence quality.
Risk of Bias Within and Across Studies
The quality of individual RCTs within the review may vary, affecting the overall findings. Across Studies, variability in study designs, populations, and interventions may impact the overall conclusions.
Results and Intervention Effect on Outcome of Interest
The result of the systematic review and meta-analysis was that cerebral oximetry utilization during surgery caused an increase in favorable outcomes in patients, such as lessening the development of postoperative complications5. Accordingly, the employment of cerebral oximetry during surgery would be useful for the better emergence of patients and the prevention of complications; therefore, the use of this monitoring technique would be appropriate in surgical settings.
References
Holmgaard F, Vedel AG, Rasmussen LS, Paulson OB, Nilsson JC, Ravn HB. The association between postoperative cognitive dysfunction and cerebral oximetry during cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(2):196-205. doi:10.1016/J.BJA.2019.03.045
Uysal S, Lin HM, Trinh M, Park CH, Reich DL. Optimizing cerebral oxygenation in cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial examining neurocognitive and perioperative outcomes. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;159(3). doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.036
Lim L, Nam K, Lee S, et al. The relationship between intraoperative cerebral oximetry and postoperative delirium in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):1-10. doi:10.1186/S12871-020-01180-X
Juliana N, Yazit NAA, Kadiman S, et al. Intraoperative cerebral oximetry in open heart surgeries reduced postoperative complications: A retrospective study. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251157. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0251157
Wong ZZ, Chiong XH, Chaw SH, et al. The use of cerebral oximetry in surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(7):2002-2011. doi:10.1053/
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
1. Holmgaard F, Vedel AG, Rasmussen LS, Paulson OB, Nilsson JC, Ravn HB. The association between postoperative cognitive dysfunction and cerebral oximetry during cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(2):196-205. doi:10.1016/J.BJA.2019.03.045
2. Uysal S, Lin HM, Trinh M, Park CH, Reich DL. Optimizing cerebral oxygenation in cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial examining neurocognitive and perioperative outcomes. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;159(3). doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.036
Systematic Literature Review
3. Lim L, Nam K, Lee S, et al. The relationship between intraoperative cerebral oximetry and postoperative delirium in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):1-10. doi:10.1186/S12871-020-01180-X
4. Juliana N, Yazit NAA, Kadiman S, et al. Intraoperative cerebral oximetry in open heart surgeries reduced postoperative complications: A retrospective study. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251157. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0251157
5. Wong ZZ, Chiong XH, Chaw SH, et al. The Use of Cerebral Oximetry in Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(7):2002-2011. doi:10.1053/J.JVCA.2021.09.046
!!!!Please please, follow the instructions accordingly!!!
Based on the above 5 articles (citations), answer the following:
Write the findings of each article separately.
– Study characteristics (participants, relevant methodology, and quality).
– Risk of bias within and across studies
– Results of individual studies and intervention effect on outcome of interest. The results should be provided around answers to posed clinical questions or domains (using sub-headings) rather than reporting on individual studies.
AMA format.
Complete the order form and upload all of your files, including any instructions, rubrics, or other materials provided by your instructor. 
Complete the order payment after filling in the order form. We’ll receive your order and assign it to a writer.
The assigned writer will complete your paper and forward it to our Editing Team for review and approval.
Once approved by the editor, the completed paper will be uploaded to your account for you to download, review and approve.