Security Architecture and Design

Security Architecture and Design

Analysis Commencement

Security architecture and design analysis regarding a new system or application should begin as early as possible. The analysis should assess the current security state to assess the system’s purpose, identify any areas of concern, and facilitate the creation of effective and efficient security architecture and design (Gehrmann & Gunnarsson, 2019). This assessment should occur during the planning stages before any development takes place. As part of the assessment, the architect should review the existing requirements and identify any risk areas that could threaten the system’s security.

Activities the Architect Must Execute

When conducting a security architecture and design analysis, the architect must assess the areas of concern, document the findings, and develop a security architecture and design. The areas of concern must be evaluated, including the system’s purpose and risk acceptance criteria, to identify potential threats and weaknesses. Documenting the findings provides the architect with evidence of the current security state and helps inform further security architecture and design decisions (Tiburski et al., 2019). Lastly, the architect must develop a comprehensive security architecture and design to protect the system against security threats.

The security architect should ensure that security is built into the system from the beginning of the development process. By taking into account these key factors, the security architect will be able to develop a security architecture that meets the system’s requirements and is appropriate for the environment in which the system will be deployed. The security architecture should include a description of the proposed system, including the components, the purpose of the system, the environment in which the system will be used, the security requirements for the system, and the risk acceptance criteria (Van Ginkel et al., 2019). The security architect is also responsible for ensuring that security is built into the system from the beginning of the development process rather than as an afterthought.

The Set of Knowledge Domains Applied to the Analysis

The architect must be well-versed in multiple areas to conduct a thorough risk analysis and create a robust security architecture and design. Architects need expertise in cryptography, a field essential to secure communication and data protection. This necessitates expertise in areas like encryption, key management, and secure protocol implementation. Since modern systems rely heavily on networking and cloud infrastructure, architects today need to be fluent in these areas (Bagara et al., 2020). To guarantee a risk-free rollout, they must be well-versed in virtualization, cloud security best practices, network protocols, firewall setups, intrusion detection systems, and more.

The Tips and Tricks that Make Security Architecture Risk Assessment Easier

The architect should first learn about the system’s goals and the acceptable level of risk before making any judgments about the security of the system’s architecture and design. The architect also needs to know everything there is to know about the deployment setting for the system and utilize threat models to spot security flaws in the blueprints (Zhang et al., 2019). As the architecture and design evolve, the architect should use the method of continuous evaluation to help spot emerging risks. Finally, the architect must employ automation to record the assessment’s findings, track any design or architecture changes, and report on the system’s performance.

The architects should ensure complete transparency in a system’s architecture and design to better pinpoint hazards and gauge their potential impact. An effective user and security access control system can be implemented to accomplish this goal. There is also a need to maintain a regular schedule of in-house evaluations, which will aid in locating flaws in the security architecture and design. Unseen or unautomated threats can be uncovered with this method. Moreover, use industry-recommended security measures, as these serve as a solid foundation for building a bulletproof system. Following established security guidelines throughout development can help keep vulnerabilities minimal (Zhang et al., 2019).

Security risk assessment can also be simplified and improved by keeping the system’s security measures current and efficient; through that, one is likely to lessen the likelihood of exploitation and other attacks. Also, to maintain the security posture of a system, it is recommended to conduct regular risk analyses. Security flaws can be found and patched more easily if the system’s architecture and design are regularly evaluated (Sha et al., 2020). There is also a need to create a comprehensive security policy in order to build a safe system. Defined responsibilities, a password policy, and application security guidelines are required. Employing threat intelligence is one way of protecting the system from emerging security threats. That can be achieved by reading the top security-related publications and by subscribing to relevant newsletters.

References

Bagaa, M., Taleb, T., Bernabe, J. B., & Skarmeta, A. (2020). A machine learning security framework for IoT systems. IEEE Access, 8, 114066-114077. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9097876

Gehrmann, C., & Gunnarsson, M. (2019). A digital twin-based industrial automation and control system security architecture. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(1), 669-680. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8822494/

Sha, K., Yang, T. A., Wei, W., & Davari, S. (2020). A survey of edge computing-based designs for IoT security. Digital Communications and Networks, 6(2), 195-202. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352864818303018

Tiburski, R. T., Moratelli, C. R., Johann, S. F., Neves, M. V., de Matos, E., Amaral, L. A., & Hessel, F. (2019). Lightweight security architecture based on embedded virtualization and trust mechanisms for IoT edge devices. IEEE Communications Magazine, 57(2), 67-73. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8647115/

Van Ginkel, N., De Groef, W., Massacci, F., & Piessens, F. (2019). A server-side JavaScript security architecture for secure integration of third-party libraries. Security and Communication Networks, 2019. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/scn/2019/9629034/

Zhang, S., Wang, Y., & Zhou, W. (2019). Towards secure 5G networks: A Survey. Computer Networks, 162, 106871. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/a:link {text-decoration: none;}a:visited {text-decoration: none;
}a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} a:active {text-decoration: underline;}

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

When should the architect begin the analysis?
What are the activities the architect must execute?
What is the set of knowledge domains applied to the analysis?

What are the tips and tricks that make security architecture risk assessment easier?
Answer the questions with an APA-formatted paper (Title page, body and references only). Your response should have a MINIMUM of 750 words. Count the words only in the body of your response, not the references. A table of contents and abstract are not required.
A minimum of THREE REFERENCES are required. One reference for the book is acceptable but multiple references are allowed. There should be multiple citations within the body of the paper. Note that an in-text citation includes author’s name, year of publication and the page number where the paraphrased material is located.