Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) represent substantial problems in modern healthcare, necessitating thorough containment and prevention techniques. Root-cause analysis has emerged as an important approach to understanding the underlying causes of many diseases. As noted by (Haque et al., 2020), this strategy allows healthcare facilities to reveal the complexities of HAIs, supporting the deployment of effective preventive measures. (Puro et al., 2022) define root-cause analysis as a systematic strategy for determining the causes of adverse events, such as HAIs. This discussion lays the groundwork for investigating how root-cause analysis might drive targeted interventions and continuous improvement efforts to reduce HAIs and improve patient safety.

Analysis of the Root Cause

The root cause analysis (RCA) is used to investigate the issue of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in a healthcare context. CLABSIs are bloodstream infections caused by central venous catheters, widely used in hospitalized patients to administer various medical therapies. In this case, the issue was the prevalence of CLABSIs among patients who had central lines implanted. The infection control team noticed the problem during routine surveillance, which revealed increased CLABSI rates above the predicted baseline. The patients who were impacted had central lines implanted for medical reasons such as intravenous treatment, hemodialysis, or parenteral nourishment. CLABSIs had a substantial impact on these individuals by inducing bloodstream infections, which led to longer hospital stays and higher healthcare expenses (Wei et al., 2021).

Issue Description

A root cause analysis (RCA) is initiated in response to a series of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), notably central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in the healthcare facility. Patients get bloodstream infections after having central venous catheters inserted, which poses a serious risk to patient safety. (Wei et al., 2021). The problem was discovered by healthcare workers monitoring patient outcomes and infection rates. CLABSIs had a direct impact on patients, resulting in longer hospital stays, greater morbidity, and sometimes fatal outcomes. Furthermore, the infections increased healthcare expenses and stretched the facility’s resources.

Analysis and Findings

The investigation investigates the circumstances surrounding each reported instance of CLABSI and discovers many significant factors. Environmental factors, such as inadequate adherence to infection control methods and cleaning standards, have been shown to influence the occurrence of CLABSIs. Human errors, such as failures in hand hygiene measures and poor catheter insertion techniques, have also been identified as major contributors. Furthermore, patient-related factors, such as underlying medical problems and impaired immune systems, have been shown to increase susceptibility to infection.

After evaluating the events leading up to CLABSIs, it is clear that there were deviations from the intended protocols and procedures for central line insertion and management. Controllable environmental variables, such as limited personnel and resource allocation, also contributed to the prevalence of HAIs. Furthermore, communication breakdowns between healthcare team members regarding infection control practices and patient care plans have been identified as potential contributing causes.

Root Cause Identification

Following a thorough investigation, the fundamental causes of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in the healthcare facility are found. These primary reasons include ineffective infection control procedures, insufficient staffing levels, and communication breakdowns among healthcare team members.

Firstly, weaknesses in infection control procedures emerge as a significant root cause. There were violations of recognized infection prevention protocols during central line insertion and management. For example, gaps in hand hygiene standards and inappropriate catheter insertion techniques were seen, allowing pathogen ingress and resulting in CLABSIs. Furthermore, inadequate hygiene requirements at catheter insertion sites are related to the increased risk of infection transmission. (Alshahrani et al., 2023)

Second, inadequate staffing levels are indicated as a risk factor for CLABSIs. During situations of understaffing, healthcare providers may face increased workloads and a diminished ability to fully adhere to infection control policies. This can lead to rushed operations, reduced attention to detail, and an increased risk of errors, all of which contribute to the development of HAIs like CLABSIs.

Application of Evidence-Based Strategies

The use of evidence-based methods is crucial to reduce the occurrence of central line-associated bloodstream infections within the hospital setting and promote patient safety in the context of hospital-associated Infections (HAIs). Further, deficiencies in infection control practices, such as inadequate hand hygiene compliance and improper catheter insertion techniques, are significant contributors to CLABSIs; it further suggests that delays during central line insertion procedures or catheter management can impair sterility and increase the incidence of CLABSIs.

Regular training sessions on infection prevention and control measures, such as proper hand hygiene techniques, aseptic central line insertion and maintenance, and effective communication strategies, have been shown to significantly improve patient safety outcomes (Barrera-Cancedda et al., 2019). Well-trained healthcare professionals are more likely to follow infection control policies, resulting in a significant reduction in the occurrence of HAIs. Barrera-Cancedda et al., 2019 found that healthcare facilities with effective staff training programs had lower incidences of central line-associated bloodstream infections than those with poor training initiatives. To reduce the risk of HAIs and improve overall patient care, it is critical to invest in continual education and training for healthcare professionals.

According to Barrera-Cancedda et al., 2019 Antimicrobial stewardship strategies are critical in the prevention of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), notably in lowering the prevalence of central line-associated bloodstream infections caused by antibiotic resistance. By focusing on optimizing antibiotic use and promoting conservative prescribing practices, these programs aim to limit the selection pressure for resistant organisms and associated illnesses.

Improvement Plan with Evidence-Based and Best-Practice Strategies

Actions

Enhanced Hand Hygiene Protocol

To promote compliance among healthcare professionals, the implementation of a thorough hand hygiene protocol that includes frequent training sessions and easy access to hand hygiene materials is important. With regards to Engdaw et al., 2019 better hand hygiene practices greatly reduce pathogen transmission and consequent HAIs

Central Line Insertion Bundle

This reduces the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) by creating and executing a standardized central line insertion bundle that includes evidence-based procedures such as maximal barrier measures and chlorhexidine skin antiseptic. Research by Buetti et al. (2022) shows that using central line bundles reduces CLABSI rates significantly.

 Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

The creation of an antimicrobial stewardship program optimizes antibiotic use and reduces the occurrence of HAIs linked to antibiotic resistance (Nathwani et al., 2019).

Goal

The goal is to reduce the occurrence of HAIs, particularly CLABSIs, and to improve the overall quality of care and patient outcomes in healthcare settings by promoting hand hygiene and implementing evidence-based interventions. Implementing an antimicrobial stewardship program will improve patient safety outcomes and lessen the incidence of HAIs caused by antibiotic resistance.

Timeline

• Months 1-2: Work with key stakeholders to develop and finalize the hand hygiene procedure, central line insertion bundle, and antimicrobial stewardship program.
• Months 3–4: Provide staff training on hand cleanliness protocols and central line insertion bundling procedures. Commence implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship program.
• Months 5-6: Check for compliance with hand cleanliness measures and central line insertion bundle practices. Assess the efficacy of the antimicrobial stewardship program in minimizing antibiotic resistance and HAIs.
• Ongoing: Continuous monitoring, evaluation, and refinement of adopted initiatives in response to feedback and results data.

Resources Necessary for the Plan

In healthcare organizations, using existing personnel and resources is critical for successfully implementing safety improvement initiatives targeted at lowering Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs). The infection control team, which includes infection preventionists and epidemiologists, possesses the particular knowledge required to develop and implement treatments such as hand hygiene procedures and central line insertion bundles.

Engaging nursing staff, who serve as frontline caregivers, also improves protocol adherence and builds a patient safety culture. Their participation in training sessions and peer education programs encourages the best infection prevention measures. Collaboration with the quality improvement department provides effective monitoring and assessment of initiatives, leveraging data analytics tools to track infection rates and compliance metrics.

However, to supplement existing resources, expenditures in training materials, technology infrastructure, and committed personnel are required. These materials make it easier to educate, manage data, and implement programs, all of which are critical to the long-term success of safety improvement activities. Healthcare organizations can improve patient safety results by effectively employing current resources and getting critical support.

Conclusion

Decreasing Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) necessitates a holistic approach that makes use of current organizational resources while also identifying places where more assistance is required. Collaboration between the infection control team, nursing staff, and the quality improvement department is critical for creating and implementing evidence-based interventions. Healthcare organizations can increase their ability to successfully implement safety improvement strategies by investing in training materials, technology, and manpower. Organizations should strive for better patient safety outcomes and lower HAI rates by continuously monitoring, evaluating, and refining actions. Finally, prioritizing patient safety and utilizing available resources displays a dedication to providing high-quality care and fostering a culture of safety in healthcare settings.

References

Alshahrani, K. M., Alhuwaishel, A. Z., Alangari, N. M., Asiri, M. A., Al-Shahrani, N. A., Alasmari, A. A., Alzahrani, O. J., Ayedh, A. Y., Qitmah, M. M., Alshahrani, K. M., Alshahrani, A. Z., Alangari, N. M., Asiri, M. A., Sr, N. A.-S., Alasmari, A. A., Alzahrani, O. J., Ayedh, A. Y., & Qitmah, M. (2023). Clinical Impacts and Risk Factors for Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review. Cureus, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40954

Barrera-Cancedda, A. E., Riman, K. A., Shinnick, J. E., & Buttenheim, A. M. (2019). Implementation strategies for infection prevention and control promotion for nurses in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0958-3

Buetti, N., Marschall, J., Drees, M., Fakih, M. G., Hadaway, L., Maragakis, L. L., Monsees, E., Novosad, S., O’Grady, N. P., Rupp, M. E., Wolf, J., Yokoe, D., & Mermel, L. A. (2022). Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 update. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 43(5), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2022.87

Engdaw, G. T., Gebrehiwot, M., & Andualem, Z. (2019). Hand hygiene compliance and associated factors among health care providers in Central Gondar zone public primary hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 8(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0634-z

Haque, M., McKimm, J., Santelli, M., Dhingra, S., Labricciosa, F. M., Islam, S., Jahan, D., Nusrat, T., Chowdhury, T. S., Coccolini, F., Iskandar, K., Catena, F., & Charan, J. (2020). Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Narrative Overview.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze the root cause of a specific safety concern in a healthcare setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen healthcare setting, provide a rationale for your plan.

Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX] Download Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX]template to help you stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.

Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

• Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
• Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
• Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
• Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
• Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using the current APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your Assessment 2 will focus on the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1.