Response to Critique of Writing Sample from Weekly PowerPoint

Response to Critique of Writing Sample from Weekly PowerPoint

It is intriguing to note that the letter is not really attractive to the reader from the outlook. While it is true that it has the address, it is anonymous. By so saying, the letter has both strengths and weaknesses. With this notion in mind, it suffices to maintain that this paper will explore the strengths and weaknesses, assess whether it is in context, and succeeds in its purposes. Also, attention would be on determining the pattern of mistakes in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, etc. I will give examples of these errors from the sample, address any problems that the writer needs to take into account in the revision, propose specific changes to improve the sample in the revision, What other problems present, and If the letter’s author were to want to improve the letter, what specific measures could he or she take to improve it.

Foremost, the letter is brief for an official letter. Its strengths and weaknesses are present. In this letter addressed to the President, the power of this letter is that it is brief as an official letter. Even though it is much simple in its diction, the letter in its simplicity has been able to relay the intentions of the writer to relay the message briefly and to the point. The weaknesses in this letter are that there is no title and there are plenty of mistakes in its tenses. Besides, the writer loses his credibility with their anonymity, making them not be taken seriously.

Furthermore, the letter is addressed by an anonymous person to the President of the United States, Bush, to bring over the soldiers fighting abroad. In this case, they wanted Bush to be aware of the fact that in efforts to ensure that they were strengthening other countries, the US was suffering domestically. It is more so when it comes to education and other social factors; plenty of money is used to fund foreign missions at the peril of the progress that is much needed back home in the US.

Also, it is imperative to understand that in as much as the letter addresses pertinent issues, it needs to ensure that it meets the criteria for meeting its objectives. It suffices to say that it did not succeed in its purpose due to the way it is written. For instance, there are various cases of grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. In the sample letter, the author says, “Its not fair that the soldiers are fighting for nothing” which suggests that there are various things that need to be solved and fixed in this work to reach a level that could ensure that it reaches the President. In this letter, the writer has to make sure that the diction in the play should meet official standards. Also, the writer needs to provide areas that show the address of the sender and the addressee.

Furthermore, the letter was written to the President of the US to express concerns about how Americans’ lives were deteriorating. Yet, billions of dollars were being spent on foreign endeavors, which exposed people to poor services in a country that should essentially be the very best in the world. Yet, it was failing in the education system.

Undoubtedly, the letter is not appropriate for the audience for which it is intended. It is irregularly spaced, anonymously written, has poor diction, and lacks information on the addressee and the addressed. The use of diction in this letter makes it unappealing to the reader because there are numerous cases where many words are repeated in the first paragraph alone.

Lastly, when the writer should be provided with the chance to fix their letter, the writer should first fix the diction and vocabulary usage because the language is unappealing to the readers. Further, the writer should put the address of the addressee and the letter’s title for the audience to understand the message being relayed without necessarily having to go through the whole paper.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

You will evaluate the writing sample at the end of the weekly PowerPoints.  In your critique, you will:

evaluate and address the strengths and weaknesses of whether, in its context, the sample succeeds in its purpose the pattern of mistakes in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, etc. Give examples of these errors from the sample address any problems that the writer needs to take into account in the revision propose specific changes to improve the sample in the revision.

What other problems do you notice? If the letter’s author were to want to improve the letter, what specific measures could he or she take to improve it? What is the letter about? To whom is it addressed? What are the letter’s strengths? What are its weaknesses? Do you think the letter succeeds in its purpose? Is it appropriate to the audience? What kinds of mistakes do you notice? Do they seem to follow a pattern? If so, describe it. What examples can you draw from the letter to support your observation? What other problems do you notice? If the letter’s author were to want to improve the letter, what specific measures could he or she take to improve it?