Exploring Adult Development-A Critical Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Research Journal Articles

Exploring Adult Development-A Critical Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Research Journal Articles

Article One Summary

Alharbi et al. (2020) journal examined chronic illness among old-age patients in Saudi Arabia. Specifically, the researchers wanted to investigate the role that gender plays as a risk factor for chronic diseases among old-age patients. In this cross-sectional study, the researchers studied 319 elderly patients who were sampled randomly (Alharbi et al., 2020). The researcher found out that most of their patients, 83 percent, were obese, and the most common illnesses were diabetes, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, and chronic respiratory conditions, as well as endocrine disease (Alharbi et al., 2020). The researchers proved that gender had a role to play in the kind of chronic illnesses that are prevalent during old age.

The Main Points

The paper’s main point was to prove that during old age, gender can determine the illnesses that older adults get. In other words, being male puts one at a much higher risk of genitourinary system diseases (Alharbi et al., 2020). This was proven by the study that also revealed that women were at a much higher risk of having chronic illnesses during their old age (Alharbi et al., 2020). The study also showed that multimorbidity significantly increased the risks of diseases, thus calling for frequent hospital visits among the elderly.

Evaluation

This article connects with this week’s topic. The connection is seen in the fact that it helps to clarify certain myths about old age. People often think that older adults get sick just because they are old. However, this study illuminates a new perspective that gender plays a role in illnesses during old age (Cooper & Gosnell, 2022). As seen, women are at a higher risk of having chronic diseases during old age. Also, this study is significant to this week’s topic because it helps increase understanding of old age biology. The only emerging concern would be that this study focuses on older adults in Saudi, which makes it difficult to generalize since cultures and environment determine people’s lifestyles, which in turn greatly determines old age illnesses.

Article Two Summary

This second journal examines the case of mental illness among older adults. The central aim of the study was to explore the prevalence of mental illness among older adults. In this case, they surveyed people aged 55 years and above (McCombe et al., 2018). The data they used was retrieved from EMR. Out of 74,261 patients who were selected for the study, 14,143 were found to have mental health disorders (McCombe et al., 2018). This figure meant that the prevalence rate of mental illness among the elderly was 19.1 percent (McCombe et al., 2018). Additionally, the data collected showed that the prevalence rate of mental diseases increased as age increased.

The Main Points

The first primary point in this journal was that the more people get older, the higher their chances of having mental health issues (McCombe et al., 2018). Secondly, the research made it clear that the most common mental health issues among older people were issues such as anxiety disorder, hypnotics, and depression (McCombe et al., 2018). The research also showed that there are those with cognitive disorders, even though the percentage was as low as 5 percent.

Evaluation

This journal connects very well with this week’s topic because it helps to explain issues surrounding cognitive illnesses among the elderly. As a result, it contributes to dispelling beliefs in some societies that elderly persons mainly have cognitive impairments or that as people age, their cognitive capacities deteriorate (Cooper & Gosnell, 2022). The study shows that this age group has mental health concerns, but this is not an indication that they become insane. The one thing that this paper fails to address is the connection between the identified mental illnesses and lifestyles. Even so, the sample population for the study was large enough for the outcome to be generalized.

References

Alharbi, B. A., Masud, N., Alajlan, F. A., Alkhanein, N. I., Alzahrani, F. T., Almajed, Z. M., Alessa, R. K. M., & Al-Farhan, A. I. (2020). Association of elderly age and chronic illnesses: Role of gender as a risk factor. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 9(3), 1684–1690. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1060_19

Cooper, K., & Gosnell, K. (2022). Foundations and Adult Health Nursing – E-Book. United States: Elsevier Health Sciences.

McCombe, G., Fogarty, F., Swan, D., Hannigan, A., Fealy, G. M., Kyne, L., Meagher, D., & Cullen, W. (2018). Identified mental disorders in older adults in primary care: A cross-sectional database study. The European journal of general practice, 24(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1402884

Through this assignment, you will be able to critically evaluate research studies in the field of adult development. Each week you will read and analyze two peer-reviewed research journal articles related to the weekly topics. You will use the South University Online Library databases to locate these articles. Other sources such as the text (other than as supporting citations), Wikipedia, and other online sources will not be accepted.Free Essay Example

Submit your analysis as a Word document using APA style guidelines. In your analysis:

Write a summary for each journal article.
Describe the main points of each article and how that article relates to the week’s course and text readings.
Evaluate the articles from your own thoughts and perspectives regarding the topics covered.
Use this topic area for the focus of your Week 1 article analysis:
Myths and realities of older adults: A biological and cognitive perspective

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Review your Deconstruction notes/your answers to the SOAPSToneS method and the three modes of argument, pathos, and ethos for Seven Ways High School Prepares You for Failure by Kelsey Diaz.

Exploring Adult Development-A Critical Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Research Journal Articles

2.) Read and annotate “Shitty First Drafts” by Anne Lamott by using the questions in the SOAPSToneS method and finding the three modes of argument-logos, pathos, and ethos in the reading.
3.) Create a Venn Diagram (see attached file for printing and annotations) to compare the two readings. This will be your outline for your assignment in step 4.
4.) Using your annotations for the two readings and the Venn Diagram as your outline, write a two to three-page comparison response to “Seven Ways High School Prepares you for Failure” and “Shitty First Drafts.” Post only your two to three-page Comparison Response as your initial Discussion thread, then move on to step 5.
5.) Respond to three of your classmates.
View Discussion