Evaluating Enterprise Content – Impact on Management Infrastructure and EDM Framework

HealthcareX, which is already among the largest healthcare providers, has gone paperless and uses digital systems in compliance with US Claim Privacy. HealthcareX’s primary sources of data are electronic medical records (EMRs), patient health information (PHI), and administrative records. Nevertheless, the company may experience problems with handling this data successfully since it may result in matters such as data unreliability, inconsistency, and insufficient facilities to keep confidential information. The main issue of HealthcareX with data management is due to the inability to handle content; hence, the quality of data is impossible to guarantee, and data availability is suboptimal, along with its security. In this situation, these issues can be critical to patient privacy, compliance with regulations, and the efficacy of the operating system. The task ahead of HealthcareX is no trifling one, which directly affects the level of care patients receive, organizational reputation, and, most of all, legal compliance.

HealthcareX is dealing with digitalism, and therefore, a major task is managing EMRs and PHI. EMRs can be viewed as comprehensive registers of patient data, with medical history, treatment plans, medications, laboratory results, and diagnostic images. Such data is vital for the provision of quality patient care—it facilitates the process of clinical decision-making and ensures the continuity of patient care amongst health care providers. In a similar vein, PHI constitutes information that is highly confidential, like name, insurance information, and billing. Through robust PHI safeguards and compliance with HIPAA, which requires a strong measure that intends to avoid unauthorized use, access, and disclosure, protection of sensitive health data and privacy are ensured (Redman, 2016).

The challenges of the healthcare system lie in the fact that it has to manage these valuable data elements while maintaining their security and availability digitally. Problems, including data accuracy, availability, integrity, and security, put patient safety and regulatory compliance at a high risk and harm the organization’s reputation. Consequently, it is imperative that HealthcareX remedies the challenges, which is vital for the organization to evolve its data management practices, boost the quality of patient care, and minimize the compliance risks that come with healthcare data governance.

The problem that HealthcareX deals with is not new to the industry. Some healthcare companies have challenges in adopting digital records by ensuring they control their data integrity, security, and privacy. When referring to industry data, it is common to know that the cost connected to data management inefficiencies, including breaches, infringement penalties, and operational issues, can be substantial, starting from millions up to billions of dollars.

Uncontrolled data within HealthcareX poses several risks:

The advantages of the Internet and communication technology come with the elevated risks of cyberattacks and data breaches.
Inappropriate patient data contributes to a number of different clinical mistakes and eventually leads to patient safety diminution.
Non-conformity with regulatory mandates like HIPAA may trigger litigations and legal issues, resulting in severe consequences to the image of a business.

Relevant Company Information

Primary Data Source. HealthcareX does its prime healthcare data collection through EMR and PHI sources. The types are all-encompassing history, treatment and diagnostic reports, bills, as well as past medical history.

Primary Data Problem. The company’s challenges concerning data management precisely point to the inadequacy of data management, which often leads to data inconsistency, data inaccuracy, and lack of data protection for sensitive information. Hence, this makes it quite difficult for the organization to thoroughly confirm the accuracy, availability, and security of the information, and it reveals the risks to the privacy of patients, regulatory compliance, and effectiveness of the work.

Importance of the Data. HealthcareX is a custodian of patient data, which includes EMRs and PHI. Their role in the delivery of quality care aids clinician decision-making processes and continuity of care from one provider to another cannot be overemphasized. These data components make up the backbone of healthcare operations, enabling health providers to deliver care in a timely manner, give correct diagnoses, and tailor treatment processes.

Industry Relevance. That said, the data management issue that HealthcareX encounters is a common hurdle within the healthcare sector. Several healthcare facilities have difficulty switching from paper-based to digital systems when they take into cognizance that data should be protected, secure, and in conformity with privacy laws like HIPPA. Consequently, the issues that HealthcareX deals with mirror the common problems of electronic health records and customer data safety in the healthcare sector.

Potential Cost. Data management costs in healthcare organizations are found to be humongous, as revealed by dossier industry studies. That implies all these costs are losses from data breaches, regulatory fines, legal penalties, reputation falls, and operational bottlenecks. The specific price a company would have to pay to generalized costs from data problems can include but not be limited to ranges of millions to billions of dollars in case of a data breach or compliance violation.

Key Elements About Uncontrolled Data. Amongst the mismanaged data within HealthcareX, the key concerns include the increased danger of cybersecurity attacks, patients’ safety being compromised by incorrect medical documents, and non-compliance with laws such as HIPAA. Scientific research discusses how it is imperative to establish and insist on stringent data governance practices to tackle these risks. This makes sure that data is accurate, safe, and accessible throughout its cycle of life.

EDM Framework Comparison

IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Microsoft SQL Server Master Data Services (MDS)

IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Elements/Structure/Components

Data Integration: Enables seamless integration of disparate data sources, ensuring data consistency and accessibility.
Data Quality Management: Implements processes for data cleansing, validation, and enrichment to enhance data accuracy and reliability.
Metadata Management: Provides a centralized repository for managing metadata, facilitating data lineage, documentation, and understanding.
Master Data Management (MDM): Manages master data entities, ensuring consistency and integrity across the organization.
Data Governance: Establishes policies, processes, and controls for governing data usage, access, and security.

Importance in Use

Offers a comprehensive suite of data management components, addressing key aspects of data integration, quality, governance, and master data management.
Provides organizations with a robust infrastructure for managing data assets effectively, ensuring data quality, consistency, integrity, and security throughout their lifecycle.

Real Outcomes from Successful Implementation

Improved data quality and accuracy, leading to enhanced decision-making capabilities
Increased operational efficiency through streamlined data integration and processing
Strengthened regulatory compliance with HIPAA, HITECH, and other healthcare regulations
Enhanced data governance practices, ensuring security, integrity, and accessibility of data assets.

Contrast and Alignment with Company Problem

HealthcareX’s data management issues fit very nicely with the IBM InfoSphere Information Server. Key issues of master data management, quality, governance, and data integration are covered by its extensive collection of components. HealthcareX may improve security and compliance with legal standards like HIPAA, simplify its data management procedures, and guarantee data accuracy and consistency by putting this approach into practice.

Outcome Expected from Successful Implementation

Increased accuracy and consistency of PHI and EMRs would be concrete advantages of a successful IBM InfoSphere Information Server implementation at HealthcareX (Harrison et al., 2018).
Increased productivity by means of simplified data processing and integration
Enhanced observance of HIPAA and other healthcare laws
Better ability to make decisions supported by trustworthy and dependable data
Better quality and safety of patient treatment by means of quick and correct information availability

HealthcareX’s data management issues are addressed with the IBM InfoSphere Information Server, which also fits nicely with the intended results of a successful implementation. Since the IBM InfoSphere Information Server addresses important facets of data integration, quality, governance, and master data management with a complete suite of data management components, it is the product I chose. It offers observable results, including better data quality, operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and greater decision-making abilities, and it fits HealthcareX’s data management requirements nicely.

Impact of Governance Frameworks on HealthcareX

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)

HIPAA imposes laws designed to enforce the protection of patients’ health information, keeping it confidential, uncorrupted, and available at all times. Data protection is also a key issue, and HealthcareX must act within the framework of HIPAA regulations to handle patient data correctly and avoid sanctions. Non-compliance can lead to large cases of fines while also having legal consequences and reputation damage.

HITECH (Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act)

HITECH supplements the provisions of the HIPAA law, emphasizing the accuracy of the electronic health records (EHR) collected while improving the security and privacy of patients’ health information. The compliance of HealthcareX with HITECH’s relevant digital system and EMR usage regulations, being subject to its information security and privacy requirements, falls under the purview of HITECH.

SOX (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)

However, although mainly aimed at accounting and financial reporting, the Act also has some consequences on data governance and security that should be associated with the reliability and integrity of financial information. HealthcareX could encounter a situation where it needs to verify that its practices of data governance are in line with SOX precautions, particularly if the company is placed on a stock exchange or receives federal funding.

EDM’s Relationship with Governance

Scientific research highlights the critical relationship between Enterprise Data Management (EDM) and governance frameworks such as HIPAA, HITECH, and SOX:

Data Quality and Compliance

EDM environments emphasize concepts and means of ensuring that records and information systems are correct, coherent, and unchanged. EDM practices allow HealthcareX to build solid data governance policies and practices that follow the requirements of HIPAA, HITECH, and SOX (Hartono, 2020). For one, it involves the development of common data standards, the execution of data validation and verification rules, and the implementation of access controls to ensure the safety of personal information.

Risk Management

EDM frameworks allow companies to prevent concerns connected with data leakages, infringements of umlauts, and application failures. The implementation of data governance principles in compliance with the regulatory norms and standards shall boost the company’s ability to detect and remove the threats beforehand, thus protecting private information, including patient health data and others.

Auditing and Monitoring

EDM promotes web auditing and monitoring, confirming the company’s overall data usage and access rules while remaining within the overall rules and regulations. Made up of these comprehensive metadata management and audit trail capabilities, EDM frameworks help see data lineage, usage patterns, compliance status, and other complicated issues related to the regulation during these audits and investigations.

Continuous Improvement

EDM acts as an engine that drives faster and sustains the modernization of data governance processes, thus allowing HealthcareX to adapt quickly to new legislation, regulations, and standards. Therefore, HealthcareX can use data management standards and tools to upsurge its data governance competencies to decrease its compliance risk and enhance enterprise operations.

HealthcareX would probably be unable to stabilize the legal framework and follow the rules of HIPAA, HITECH, and SOX unless EDM had a significant impact because it enables effective data governance practices. Through its EoG management, HealthcareX can guarantee that personal data and confidential information are securely managed, thus ensuring that the privacy of patients is protected and compliance with the standards is achieved.

Week 2: Infrastructure Evaluation

Basis for Evaluation

The assessment will adopt a structured approach, using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to assess HealthcareX’s enterprise information data and its link with infrastructure and content management processes. This methodological framework will involve:

Data Collection: Collecting wide-raged data from multiple cross-sectional sources within HealthcareX, including EMRs, administrative records, and financial systems.
Data Analysis: Using statistical analysis tools to identify patterns, trends, and outliers in the data set. Here the department would conduct descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and regression modeling with the aim of getting to know the data structure of the organization in detail (Harr et al., 2019).
Stakeholder Engagement: Communicating and working with important contacts representing the interests of both IT and business departments to find out what data management challenges they face and general data management priorities. It will involve interviewing, holding focus groups, and conducting surveys to have a comprehensive overview of the organization’s data ecosystem in its depths.
Technology Assessment: Performing a detailed analysis of HealthcareX’s information technology infrastructure, which consists of hardware, software, networks, and data storage systems. It will also require conducting audits and reviews among the IT systems to establish the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
Process Mapping: Envisioning the workflow of the data in HealthcareX, wherein data starts from the collection, storage, analysis, and dissemination. It helps recognize the bottlenecks, unneeded sequences, and inefficient processes of the present data management system.

Nature of EDM to IT

Enterprise Data Management (EDM) is the summation of the concepts, processes, and technologies in a single phase, which aims to manage the data of an organization. The EDM encompasses different things:

Data Integration: The harmonious unification of diverse data resources to enable smooth data sharing and explorable information across the organizational units (Rickenberg et al., 2015).
Data Quality Management: Implementing procedures of cleansing data, validating it, and also enriching it to improve accuracy and reliability.
Metadata Management: The creation of a single standing place to host metadata upgrades, audit trails, records, and maintainability is emphasized.
Master Data Management (MDM): Maintaining the master data entities that guarantee consistent and accurate data across the organization’s systems.
Data Governance: This entails the design of policies and processes for data management that will include issues like governance, access, and security so that compliance with regulatory proceedings and industry standards will be guaranteed.

By comprehending the principle of EDM, IT executives would welcome it as an essential tool to tackle data challenges in HealthcareX and enable data management and governance measures to be practiced uniformly within the company.

Content List

Table 1: Content Management Tools for Each EDM Element

EDM Structural Element	Content Management Tools
Data Integration	– ETL Tools: Informatica, Talend – Data Integration Platforms: Microsoft Azure Data Factory, IBM InfoSphere
Data Quality Management	– Data Profiling Tools: SAS Data Quality, Informatica Data Quality – Data Cleansing Software: Trillium, Datactics
Metadata Management	– Metadata Management Tools: Collibra, IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog – Data Catalog Platforms: Alation, Waterline Data
Master Data Management	– MDM Solutions: Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance – Data Quality Platforms: Experian Pandora, Talend MDM
Data Governance	– Data Governance Platforms: Collibra, Informatica Axon – Data Privacy Management Tools: OneTrust, BigID

This table categorizes the content for major organizational processes based on EDM structural elements, analyzing the effectiveness of each element. This map-out correlates each component to a given type of content pertaining to a certain role in data management.

Content Management Tools

In order to enhance the technical connections of data between departments, HealthcareX will need a set of matching tools that follow the chosen EDM structure. These tools facilitate workers to write, keep in memory, obtain, interpret, and produce data by using these tools depending on their roles and responsibilities.

Data Integration

ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) Tools: For instance, Informatica or Talend can merge multiple sources’ data into a central data repository (Paivarinta & Munkvold, 2015).

Data Integration Platforms: Examples such as Microsoft Azure Data Factory and IBM InfoSphere platforms cover data ingestion, transformation, and load processes comprehensively.

Data Quality Management:

Data Profiling Tools: SAS Data Quality or Informatica Data Quality standardizes and assesses the quality of data by removing inconsistencies, duplicates, and errors.
Data Cleansing Software: Examples include Trillium or Datactics, which can automate the process of cleaning and standardizing data to give accuracy and consistency.

Metadata Management

Metadata Management Tools: For example, Collibra or IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog comes in handy in support of metadata creation, management, and governance of included assets.

Data Catalog Platforms: Like Alation or Waterline Data, make centralized data repositories for storing and administrating metadata that can be used organization-wide.

Master Data Management (MDM)

MDM Solutions such as Informatica MDM or SAP Master Data Governance provide the feature to amalgamate, purify, and manage master data elements.

Data Quality Platforms: Like Experian Pandora or Talend MDM, present the tools that ensure the master data records remain up-to-date and standardized.

Data Governance

Data Governance Platforms: Such tools as Collibra and Informatica Axon are gateways to processes and mechanisms of data governance defining, implementing, and enforcing policies.

Data Privacy Management Tools, Such as OneTrust or BigID, ensure that the most important guidelines of data privacy regulations are implemented, such as consent, access controls, and data subject requests (Suh et al., 2017).

Every component in HealthcareX needs to have the necessary tools that will match its data needs in such a way that it will ensure unnecessary interactions with data. Still, at the same time, it should uphold the structured process of Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) Principles and objectives. The tools utilized per EDM component are shown in the table below.

Table 1: Content Management Tools for Each EDM Element

EDM Structural Element	Content Management Tools
Data Integration	– ETL Tools: Informatica, Talend – Data Integration Platforms: Microsoft Azure Data Factory, IBM InfoSphere
Data Quality Management	– Data Profiling Tools: SAS Data Quality, Informatica Data Quality – Data Cleansing Software: Trillium, Datactics
Metadata Management	– Metadata Management Tools: Collibra, IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog – Data Catalog Platforms: Alation, Waterline Data
Master Data Management	– MDM Solutions: Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance – Data Quality Platforms: Experian Pandora, Talend MDM
Data Governance	– Data Governance Platforms: Collibra, Informatica Axon – Data Privacy Management Tools: OneTrust, BigID

Content Management Processes

Exploring HealthcareX’s content delivery mechanism entails comprehending how data is elicited within various departments as well as other organizational activities. By analyzing the process, the company would be able to know the particular stakeholders who deal with the data and how they use it to back various company functions.

Data Integration

Stakeholders: IT analysts, network technicians, and department chiefs.

Process: Data integration involves data collection from multiple sources, followed by transformation so that the data fits a uniform format and can be loaded into the main data repository. IT and data analysts are often in charge of this process, which involves data checking and ensuring that the data is consistent and correct.

Data Quality Management

Stakeholders: Data quality analysts, department managers, and Data stewards

Process: Data quality management involves a range of activities, including data cleansing, profiling, and validation to ensure the integrity, completeness, and consistency of the data. Data quality analysts and data stewards are assigned to monitor data quality metrics and implement corrective measures in case any flaw is detected.

Metadata Management

Stakeholders: Data architects, data stewards, metadata tenants, and business analysts

Process: Metadata management entails collecting, maintaining, and managing metadata detailing the organizational, content, and semantic aspects of your data stacks. Data architects and metadata administrators work with business analysts concerning the establishment and preservation of standardized metadata across the entire organization.

Master Data Management (MDM)

Stakeholders include master data managers, data governance committees, and department heads. MDM processes involve the creation, maintenance, and governance of master data entities such as customer, product, and vendor data. The primary task of a master data manager is to cooperate with data governance committees in order to put forward definitions, rules, and policies for master data (Suh et al., 2017).

Data Governance

Stakeholders: Data governance council, compliance officers, and executive leadership are examples of several roles that need to be filled.

Process: The data governance processes cover the management of data requirements, including the definition of policies, roles and responsibilities, monitoring and enforcement of data compliance, as well as data regulations and standards. The governing body of the data council, which is composed of representatives of various departments, ensures continuous data governance. It also ensures alignment with organizational goals.

Being aware of the data flow channels in HealthcareX allows the discovery of those involved in each process and the way they can use data efficiently. This awareness is a prerequisite for designing a suitable EDM compliance system and developing content management procedures that enhance the achievement of organizational objectives.

Week 3: Infrastructure Improvements

TBD

Week 4: Data Governance Evaluation

TBD

Week 5: Data Governance Improvements

TBD

References

Harr, A., Vom Brocke, J., & Urbach, N. (2019). Evaluating the individual and organizational impact of enterprise content management systems. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), 1413-1440.

Harrison, T., Pardo, T., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Canestraro, D. (2018). The salience and urgency of enterprise data management in the public sector.

Hartono, H. (2020). Evaluating IT governance at network access provider on COBIT 5 Domain EDM. Journal of Systems Integration, 11(2), 1.

Paivarinta, T., & Munkvold, B. E. (2015, January). Enterprise content management: An integrated perspective on information management. In Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 96–96). IEEE.

Redman, T. C. (2016). Data-driven: Profiting from your most important business asset. (No Title).

Rickenberg, T. A., Fill, H. G., & Breitner, M. H. (2015). Enterprise content management systems as a knowledge infrastructure. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(3), 49-70.

Suh, H., Chung, S., & Choi, J. (2017). An empirical analysis of a maturity model to assess information system success: A firm-level perspective. Behavior & information technology, 36(8), 792-808.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question

Your selected company has received the first report from your IP1 enterprise content management (ECM) project and better understands their data problem, what EDM is, some problems that EDM can help solve, and how they should think about designing an EDM system to address their needs. They want to know what content will be involved, what systems are currently related, and the IT interacting with the data (variety, volume, velocity). There might be some surprises, but overall the data should be connected to the company strategy (healthcare/service) and list how the data is currently managed before steps can be taken to implement EDM. The company’s current information infrastructure and content management processes should be analyzed through a scientific process (some specific method from a peer-reviewed article). Discuss how the data interacts with the technology/systems and tools used to manage this content (according to EDM elements like capture – not tools themselves) to provide a solid foundation for future EDM planning and prepare for IP3 where you discuss what improvements are needed to the infrastructure based on IP2. What information should be included in this type of detailed evaluation?

Evaluating Enterprise Content – Impact on Management Infrastructure and EDM Framework

Assignment

One of the first tasks in the development of an enterprise content management guidebook is to evaluate (analyze) the enterprise information data and how it relates to the infrastructure and content management processes. The enterprise information infrastructure and content management processes consist of the data and how they are collected, managed, and stored throughout their life cycle in information systems as they relate to EDM elements.

For this assignment, you will conduct an in-depth evaluation of the enterprise content (at least 3 types of data) and what it means to the management infrastructure (impact of the new data) and content management processes in your selected organization. It is easiest to view the organization as not having any digital content and documenting the parts of the system that exist relative to your EDM framework (elements of EDM). The following are the project deliverables:

Update the Enterprise Content Management and Data Governance Policies and Procedures Manual title page with a new date and project name.
Update the previously completed sections based on instructor feedback.
Suggested Headings for Information Infrastructure Evaluation
Basis
Illustrate a basis (method) for evaluation and investigate the data in the organization. Describe the nature of EDM to IT. Remember, this is helping the executives understand these aspects.
Content List
Sequence a categorized list of the content used for the major organizational processes (see Table 1) relating to each of the EDM structural elements (framework) you selected.
Content Management Tools
Survey what tools might be needed for the employees to interact with the data in each department (create, store, present, etc.) based on the selected EDM structure. This section should have at least one paragraph and table for each EDM element.
Content Management Processes
Investigate the processes’ flow (who uses the data and how) of content through the infrastructure (similar to Table 1).
Be sure to update your table of contents before submission. Name the document “yourname_IT621_IP2.doc.”

Example Structure – SEE ATTACHED

Please refer to this illustration of the expectation to guide you for your EDM structure and flow for the executives.

Example Tables with Design Elements- – SEE ATTACHED

Please refer to the illustration of the expectation for your IP2 design to discuss the data and IT through your EDM structure and flow for the executives from IP1. Review this illustration to help you with the assignment.

Evaluating Enterprise Content – Impact on Management Infrastructure and EDM Framework