Challenges of Corruption
A key challenge of corruption is rationalization. The first classic representation of this challenge is the rejection of responsibility (Arellano Gault, 2017). A person involved in corruption can deny that they knowingly participated in the fraud. Instead, they claim that they were following orders, doing what anyone could have done. Such rationalization surrenders one of the parties to corruption. Dr. Saxman rationalizes corruption by telling Grover that their purchasing director accepts gifts.
Do you need an unpublished version of the ” Challenges of Corruption “ ? Reach out to us.
Another enduring danger of corruption rationalization is damage denial. Here, the agents of corruption argue that the occurrence of the vice did little to no damage to the organization (Arellano Gault, 2017). In Grover’s case, the Prince Khalid Hospital purchasing director has traditionally acquired their supplies from Wilson’s. Hence, he can argue that they only appreciate gifts in line with Saudi customs, but the practice did little damage to the organization.
The third classic version of corruption rationalization manifested in the case is victim denial. Victim denial occurs when the primary agents of corruption rationalize corruption because current victims have benefited from past unjust practices (Arellano Gault, 2017). It is arguable that, in his 20s, Grover is not experienced and competent enough to meet the needs of Prince Khalid Specialist Hospital, hence the need to settle for more experienced players.
Combating Corruption Rationalization
According to Lawrence & Beamish (2013), efforts to combat corruption work best by first understanding how corruption manifests in a given context or region. To that end, corruption serves different purposes in different communities, including facilitating transactions and maintaining power and social relationships. Once an organization adapts to a given region’s practices, it can establish counter-corruption practices internally.
Stopping Corruption as a Leader
Transparency International (2016) states that promoting transparency and information access within an organization is the best way to end corruption. Information access bolsters employees’ participation in detecting corrupt practices. On the other hand, transparency makes employees feel like crucial organizational members; hence, they will be willing to do anything to achieve the goal.
References
Arellano Gault, D. (2017). Corruption as an organizational process: Understanding the logic of the denormalization of corruption. Contaduría Y Administración, 62(3), 827–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2016.01.008
Lawrence, J. T., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). Globally Responsible Leadership: Managing According to the UN Global Compact. Sage Publications.
Transparency International. (2016, March 10). How to Stop Corruption: 5 Key Ingredients – News. Transparency.org. https://www.transparency.org/en/news/how-to-stop-corruption-5-key-ingredients
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Challenges of Corruption
What does the author identify as the enduring challenge of corruption? How does he suggest we combat it? How would you stop corruption as a leader?
Complete the order form and upload all of your files, including any instructions, rubrics, or other materials provided by your instructor. 
Complete the order payment after filling in the order form. We’ll receive your order and assign it to a writer.
The assigned writer will complete your paper and forward it to our Editing Team for review and approval.
Once approved by the editor, the completed paper will be uploaded to your account for you to download, review and approve.