Article Review – Almonds Don’t Lactate, but That’s No Reason to Start Calling Almond Milk Juice
Summary
This article is about the criticism brought about by the spokespeople of the dairy industry. They claim that non-dairy products should not be labeled “milk,” such as rice milk and almond (1). A rural advocacy group known as Federated Farmers prompted headlines in the media suggesting that beverages from almonds should be called almond juice rather than almond milk because, according to them, it is definitely not milk. They stated that labeling plant-based beverages as milk could mislead consumers into purchasing nutritionally inferior products. Hire our assignment writing services in case your assignment is devastating you.
What ideals, effects, and consequences are at stake?
The consequences at stake, in this case, are that consumers might think that they are being misled into believing that plant-based beverages are actually milk, and therefore, they would be misled into making purchase decisions. The advocacy group has clearly stated that even though such plant-based milk can position itself as milk despite being plant-based, it tends to provide relatively inferior nutrition from a content basis (1). Due to that, they might end up losing their consumer base and potential customers, and this will significantly affect the company’s revenues. In the end, due to the lost revenues, the company’s finances could be hurt, and that would force them to cut on expenses, including laying off some of their employees.
Have any moral rights been violated?
No moral rights have been violated, as the consumers have not been deceived. Labeling product names as “almond milk” is not misleading the consumers because, in the first place, they do not think that almond milk has dairy milk with almond flavor (1). Neither do they think that peanut butter is made of dairy butter. In addition, consumers are not misled by the claimed plant-based milk’s lower nutritional value compared to animal-based milk. Only individuals who are health-conscious make sure that they buy animal-based milk products for a particular nutrition profile.
What would a Utilitarian recommend?
The utilitarian view would recommend that plant-based beverages maintain the term milk because they have the same effects and serve the same nutritional purpose as animal-based milk. That means that the two have the same nutritional value, and according to the Utilitarian view, that is what’s essential (2). This shows how well plant-based milk can do, just as animal-based milk, with the advantage of being accepted by people who do not want or cannot consume animal-based products. This is similar to the way people refer to different traps as “mousetraps” because they all trap mice (1). So it means that various consumable beverages, from goats, cows, camel, almonds, soy, or coconut, are all “milk” because all of them perform the function associated with milk.
What would a Kantian recommend?
Kant’s theory does not have anything to do with the consequences. According to Kant, a more effective way to define something is not the consequences it brings but if it is serving its intended function (3). It is true that plant-based beverages, including almond milk, function as milk. Given that they perform all the milk functions, including having the same nutritional value, it makes sense if it is referred to as “milk” (1). As stated in the article, they provide nutritional value and can be consumed with cereals and as standalone beverages. As a matter of fact, almond milk has been used as a substitute for animal milk since the Middle Ages.
Sources
Dan Weijers and Nick Munn. 2019. Almonds don’t lactate, but that’s no reason to start calling almond milk juice. https://theconversation.com/almonds-dont-lactate-but-thats-no-reason-to-start-calling-almond-milk-juice-121306
Milton Snoeyenbos and James Humber. 2007 Utilitarianism and Business Ethics, p.101. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285381690_Utilitarianism_and_Business_Ethics
Ebrahim Azadegan 2018. Review of Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective, by Norman E. Bowie, 2nd edition, p.3 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324899029_Review_of_Business_Ethics_A_Kantian_Perspective_by_Norman_E_Bowie_2nd_edition_Cambridge_Cambridge_University_Press_2017_221_pp_ISBN_978-1-107-12090-7
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question
This assignment will give you the opportunity to choose an article and then write about the ethical implications and the impact of the events that are described. Read and reflect on ONE of the following articles.
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-bodies-funeral/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/feb/18/matthewengel
https://www.change.org/p/bellefonte-change-bellefonte-high-school-mascot?utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=custom_url&recruited_by_id=f78fcc10-d965-11e7-b90c-2fe396dd86c1
https://theconversation.com/almonds-dont-lactate-but-thats-no-reason-to-start-calling-almond-milk-juice-121306
Write a paper in which you:
Analyze the following questions associated with your chosen article and discuss them using concepts you learned in this course.
What ideals, effects, and consequences are at stake?
Have any moral rights been violated?
What would a Utilitarian recommend?
What would a Kantian recommend?
Explain your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen article with supporting evidence.