Discussion - Privacy Policies And Laws

Discussion – Privacy Policies and Laws

Part 1: Privacy Laws Comparison Chart

Country	Law	Scope	Key Provisions	Penalties for Non-Compliance	Enforcement
USA	California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)	Residents of California, businesses that collect personal data	Right to know what personal data is collected, right to delete data, right to opt out of data sale	Fines up to $7,500 per violation	California Attorney General
USA	Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)	Healthcare providers, plans, and clearinghouses	Protection of health information, patient rights to access their health records, and breach notification requirements	Fines ranging from $100 to $50,000 per violation	US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
EU	General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)	All EU member states, businesses processing EU residents’ data	Right to access, right to rectification, right to erasure data portability, breach notification within 72 hours	Up to €20 million or 4% of global annual revenue	Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) of each EU member state
Australia	Privacy Act 1988	Federal government agencies, businesses, and healthcare providers	Protection of personal information, mandatory data breach notification, rights to access and correct personal information	Fines up to AUD $2.1 million	Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC)
Canada	Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)	Private sector organizations	Fair information principles, consent for data collection, right to access and correct information, data breach notification	Fines up to CAD $100,000	Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC)

Part 2: Summary

Increased internet usage among small to medium-sized businesses has deep implications for privacy policies, data protection, and intellectual property. Privacy policies are a significant challenge facing small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) due to inconsistent regulatory regimes. For example, under the European Union’s GDPR, strong data protection is necessitated for companies dealing with data belonging to E.U. residents, irrespective of the location of the business. Such a lack of compliance may mean a company pays significantly high fines; hence, SMBs should move strongly towards implementing adequate data protection strategies. Similarly, the CCPA imposes even more strict regulations on any business that collects personally identifiable data on consumers residing in California. This indicates that there are several variations regarding regional privacy laws (Illman & Temple, 2019). These requirements emphasize the issue of setting a proper privacy policy, which ensures the clarity of the collected data and ways in which they will be used, including protection measures for an SMB.

Internet usage also leads to intellectual property rights. While it offers tremendous opportunities for market expansion, the digital environment is associated with high risks of intellectual property (IP) theft or infringement. Since businesses are more reliant on digital platforms during their operation and marketing for their products, the protection afforded to IP is a critical concern (Haggerty, 2020). SMBs have to put effective cybersecurity mechanisms in place so that their IP assets are not compromised. This includes encryption, frequent security audits, and training of employees on the best practices of data protection (Klein et al., 2015).

Also, in the process of SMBs adopting Internet technologies, it becomes relevant to deal with issues of data protection proactively. According to some studies, resources and competence for applying adequate cybersecurity measures are usually unavailable in most SMBs; they can only fall easy prey to data breaches and cyber-attacks (Alahmari et al. 2020). Under such circumstances, when need be, investments in cybersecurity infrastructure and external expertise will go a long way toward helping any SMB. This will not only secure sensitive business information from hacking but also help SMBs comply with laws protecting data integrity.

Not only should business data and IPs be protected, but SMBs also need to consider the ethical dimensions in their practices of handling data. Some ethical considerations about data protection concern transparency in the collection and usage of data, informed consent by the user, and protection of privacy. Suppose a small business adopts ethical practices of data protection. In that case, consumer trust and brand loyalty can be built to help the SMB leverage a competitive advantage within the digital marketplace.

The internet has dramatically changed how SMBs conduct research and gather market intelligence. Online tools and platforms can be implemented to source and analyze large volumetric quantities of data with great insights into consumer behavior and general trends in the markets. However, these tools must be used carefully since business entities must ensure that data collection practices align with the relevant privacy laws and ethical standards (Brynjolfsson & McElheran, 2016). The techniques of anonymization of data and explicit consent on the part of users could reduce these concerns to a great extent.

The impacts of internet usage in SMBs also carry over to an online presence. A well-designed website and active social media will increase brand visibility and customer engagement accordingly. Effective online presence has, however, to go in tandem with best practices in website security measures and data protection (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010). This will ensure that websites are secure and users’ data is well protected to avoid data breaches and enhance consumers’ confidence. The utilization of the Internet by SMBs has huge implications in terms of privacy policies, data protection, and intellectual property. Small and medium-sized businesses must carefully profile a nuanced regulatory environment, allow for appropriate and robust cybersecurity mechanisms to be uniquely positioned, and instruct ethically driven rules of conduct while handling data.

References

Alahmari, A., & Duncan, B. (2020, June). Cybersecurity risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review of recent evidence. In 2020, international conference on cyber situational awareness, data analytics, and assessment (CyberSA) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). Data in action: Data-driven decision making in U.S. manufacturing. University of Toronto-Rotman School of Management.

Haggerty, K. (2020). Intellectual property guidelines for the digital humanities. In Routledge International Handbook of Research Methods in Digital Humanities (pp. 428-440). Routledge.

Illman, E., & Temple, P. (2019). California Consumer Privacy Act. The Business Lawyer, 75(1), 1637-1646.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.

Klein, B., Edwards, L., & Moss, G. (2015). Understanding copyright: Intellectual property in the digital age.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question

Assessment Description

Privacy laws or privacy policies are legal requirements notifying website visitors as to how their personal information will be used. These laws govern how information of private individuals can be used. Website privacy policy requirements are generally included in information privacy or data protection laws for a given country. The challenge is the wide discrepancies of these laws and policies per country.

Discussion – Privacy Policies and Laws

Part 1:

Create a chart comparing and contrasting at least five privacy laws from at least two different countries.

Part 2:

Write a 500- to 750-word summary evaluating the implications of internet use (privacy, policies, research, or website presence) within small to medium-sized businesses (SMB) and data protection for intellectual property.

Discussion – Privacy Policies and Laws