Qualitative Article Review

Qualitative Article Review

The scholarly investigation conducted by O’Brien et al. (2018) aimed to delve into the cognitive framework of nurses and health professionals regarding the concept of spiritual care and the consequential effects of spiritual care training on their respective clinical responsibilities. The scholars employed a qualitative approach, utilizing various methods such as recruitment, conducting semi-structured interviews, gathering data, and subjecting it to thematic analysis. This critique shall evaluate the study’s integrity, trustworthiness, confirmability, and authenticity, aiming to appraise its methodological rigour.

Integrity

The primary aim of the study conducted by O’Brien et al. (2018) was to delve into the perceptions held by nurses and healthcare professionals regarding the provision of spiritual care and assess the influence of spiritual care training on their clinical responsibilities. To attain this objective, the researchers opted for a qualitative methodology. According to O’Brien et al. (2018), qualitative research is a comprehensive methodology that delves into the intricate dynamics of interactions, experiences, and perspectives among caregivers and individuals who seek and receive healthcare services. Acknowledging the intrinsic intricacy inherent in qualitative research is a promising indicator of the study’s unwavering dedication to methodological rigour.

The researchers employed a method known as purposive recruitment to select participants for the study carefully, a strategy that aligns well with the qualitative approach they adopted. The deliberate utilization of this particular approach to selection is intended to guarantee the inclusion of individuals within the study population who are deemed to possess a higher probability of possessing unique perspectives and understandings that are directly relevant to the overarching objectives of the research. The researchers have explicitly expressed their intentions to employ a selection procedure that seeks out diverse experiences and contexts for providing spiritual care. The researchers implemented measures to ensure that the participants in the study would yield diverse and substantial data.

Furthermore, the deliberate selection of the data collection instrument, namely semi-structured interviews, enhances the integrity of the research endeavours by allowing participants to furnish rich and nuanced narratives, thereby augmenting the depth and comprehensiveness of the gathered information. The participants can express themselves with greater liberty than the constraints imposed by a conventional questionnaire, enabling them to provide a more comprehensive elucidation of their responses (Amrounds, 2014). The scholars have devised a malleable framework for the interview procedure, encompassing a combination of open-ended and closed-ended inquiries. This approach serves to bolster the credibility and trustworthiness of the research endeavours.

Trustworthiness

The notion of trustworthiness holds significant importance within qualitative research, and O’Brien et al. (2018) have attempted to examine and tackle this concept thoroughly. During data collection, participants were allowed to engage in discourse about broader viewpoints regarding the provision of spiritual care. Furthermore, O’Brien et al. (2018) explicitly directed their interviewers to refrain from evaluating the participants based on established spiritual care theories. This measure was implemented to mitigate any potential bias introduced by the interviewer, thereby granting the participants the autonomy to articulate their thoughts and perspectives regarding providing spiritual care.

The esteemed authors duly acknowledge the paramount significance of reflexivity within qualitative research. The concept of reflexivity compels the researcher to conscientiously contemplate the potential influence their preconceived narratives might exert upon analyzing the gathered data. The scholarly work conducted by O’Brien et al. (2018) meticulously expounded upon the comprehensive profiles of the interviewers, encompassing their extensive expertise in quantitative and qualitative methodologies. This astute analysis enlightened the discerning reader about the inherent susceptibility to bias that may permeate the collected data (Amrounds, 2014). The study’s authors recognized the possibility of bias arising from the interviewers’ belief systems, thus implementing a precautionary measure to prevent misinterpretation of the participants’ responses.

Confirmability

Confirmability and study integrity are closely related, however, with a more nuanced emphasis on the researcher’s attempts to ensure the authenticity of the data. The study by O’Brien et al. (2018) was executed with meticulous precision and deliberate intentionality to attain a high degree of conformability. The authors engaged the services of two researchers to conduct the interviews, wherein one researcher was designated to pose the inquiries. In contrast, the other researcher assumed the role of an observer, accurately scrutinizing and evaluating the non-verbal cues and gestures exhibited by the participant. The aforementioned researcher successfully discerned the emotional states of the participants. This facet diverged from the tonal nuances in their vocal expressions, which regrettably eluded capture through conventional voice recordings. The inherent interactivity of these interviews guarantees a certain degree of confirmability in the collected data.

The authors additionally asserted that their team had undergone comprehensive training in the fundamentals of qualitative methodology prior to embarking on the execution of the study (Amrounds, 2014). This contributes to the verifiability of the study, signifying their possession of the aptitudes and methodologies necessary to conduct qualitative research. The meticulousness exhibited by the researchers in their self-improvement endeavours serves as a reassuring testament to the verifiability of their findings.

Authenticity

The concept of authenticity pertains to the integrity of the data obtained from the participants, and it is noteworthy that O’Brien et al. (2018) took great care in addressing this aspect in their study. The authors have accurately endeavoured to thoroughly outline the participant selection process, thereby augmenting the confidence one can place in the accuracy and validity of their findings. Moreover, it is imperative to acknowledge that the data collection procedure was conducted with a sense of authority, ensuring its reliability and validity. Additionally, the participants were afforded the autonomy to engage in meaningful discussions about the intricate realm of spiritual care, allowing them to express their thoughts and experiences in a manner that resonated with their comfort levels. In essence, this study was conducted genuinely, with the authors placing significant emphasis on the nuances of sensitivity and relatability throughout the process.

Conclusion

Upon careful evaluation of the study conducted by O’Brien et al. (2018), one can posit that it was executed with commendable methodological precision. The study’s commendable dedication to upholding principles of integrity, trustworthiness, confirmability, and authenticity is a testament to its execution with competence and appropriateness. The meticulous review data collection process and the scrupulousness exercised in selecting participants engenders a discernible level of veracity and genuineness to the resultant outcomes. In its entirety, this investigation constituted an examination of exceptional caliber.

References

Amrounds. (2014, July 24). 10 Tips for Reviewing a Qualitative Paper. AM Rounds. https://academicmedicineblog.org/peer-reviewer-resources-10-tips-for-reviewing-a-qualitative-paper/

O’Brien, M. R., Kinloch, K., Groves, K. E., & Jack, B. A. (2018). Meeting patients’ spiritual needs during end‐of‐life care: A qualitative study of nurses and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of spiritual care training. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(1-2), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Module 4. You will be reviewing the following article:
O’Brien, M.R., Kinloch, K., Groves, K.E., & Jack, B.A. (2018). Meeting Patients’ Spiritual Needs During End-of-life Care: A Qualitative Study
of nurses’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of spiritual care training. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28, 182-189.
doi:10.1111/jocn14648.
Review the article completely, but specifically tease out specific information about the integrity, trustworthiness, confirmability, and authenticity of the study.

Qualitative Article Review

The following podcast provides some excellent information about reviewing a qualitative paper: http://academicmedicineblog.org/peer-reviewer-resources-10-tips-for-reviewing-a- qualitative-paper/(http://academicmedicineblog.org/peer-reviewer-resources-10-tips-for-
reviewing-a-qualitative-paper/).
Moulton, C. & Patel, P. (2014). 10 tips for reviewing a qualitative paper. Peer Review Posts in Academic Medicine Rounds-beyond the pages of Academic Medicine. AAMC.