Sensory Integration

Sensory Integration

Summary of the articles

The article by Schoen et al., Response: Commentary: Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis, reviews Camarata et al.’s paper. It explains how Camarata’s paper lacks a thorough analysis. It also explains why their recommended initiatives do not add to the existing evidence base. They report that the paper presents existing evidence incorrectly, which can lead to misunderstanding. They also report that the paper’s authors mischaracterized the initiative’s components, employed terminology common to the industry, and suggested an unsuitable framework for systematic testing.

The article by Lane et al., Neural Foundations of Ayres Sensory Integration, examines the key concepts of Ayres Sensory Integration known in the foundational work of Dr. Jean Ayres. It presents recent neuroscience scientific findings that form the key patterns of sensory integration performance and breakdown. By defining the vestibular, proprioceptive, and tactile sensory systems roles and examining how they connect to the ocular, postural, bilateral integration, praxis, and sensory modulation, we evaluate how contemporary research confirms and clarifies Ayres’ statements. We conclude by suggesting that the processes driving change due to Ayres Sensory Integration intervention are neuroplasticity.

Our experts are ready to help with your assignment. Contact us.

The main points discussed and related to this week’s course and text reading

Schoen et al. concur that there is a strong evidence base to build and support the urge for greater research into Ayres Sensory Integration. Furthermore, they recommend that the scientific community spend less time dissecting already established proof and more time performing fresh investigations that add to the established foundation of Ayres Sensory Integration. Schoen et al. also mention that more scientific investigations will be required to determine the mode of action, the change indicators, and the target population, as with any intervention. Concerning this week’s course and text reading, the paper shows the importance of correctly portraying sensory integration. An accurate portrayal of sensory integration and its efficacy is crucial for scientific investigators and clients. It will present a clear and practical future course.

Lane et al. mainly discuss the application of knowledge from the neuroscience of sensory integration. They believe that the development of modern health and educational systems should be guided by knowledge gained from the neuroscience of sensory integration and tailored interventions for newborns and children. The authors also discuss the rising prevalence of diagnoses with sensory integration and praxis impairment. They note that these rising numbers need a more nuanced understanding of the intricate brain mechanisms at play in sensory integration and praxis issues. About this week’s course and text reading, the paper highlights Ayres Sensory Integration is a collection of studies and applications demonstrating an endeavour to fully comprehend the human mind, advancing our knowledge of how variations in brain functioning impact participation and engagement.

Thoughts and perspectives regarding concepts covered in the articles

I agree with Schoen et al. that more studies need to be done regarding sensory integration. The studies should be systematically designed. It should also have appropriate recommendations that apply to a target population. The paper by Lane et al. elucidates the importance of sensory integration. It is a vital subject that aids in understanding the relationship between motor and sensory function and human behaviour. A full understanding of sensory integration creates an opportunity for the provision of individualized care in health and education systems.

References

Lane, S. J., Mailloux, Z., Schoen, S., Bundy, A., May-Benson, T. A., Parham, L. D., … & Schaaf,

153. C. (2019). Neural foundations of Ayres sensory integration®. Brain sciences, 9(7), 153.

https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9070153

Schoen, S. A., Schaaf, R. C., Mailloux, Z., Bundy, A., Lane, S., May-Benson, T. A., … & Roley, S. S. (2022). Response: Commentary: Evaluating Sensory Integration/Sensory Processing Treatment: Issues and Analysis. Front Integr Neurosci, 16, 874320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.874320

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Instructions
Article Analysis
Using the South University Online Library, find two peer-reviewed journal articles on sensory integration. In your synopsis, you will include:

Sensory Integration

A summary of each of the journal articles
The main points discussed in each of the journal articles and how they relate to the week’s course and text readings
Your thoughts and perspectives regarding the concepts covered in each of the journal articles