Risk Communication – Hurricane Katrina

Risk Communication – Hurricane Katrina

“A poor working relationship between the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA contributed to the failed response to the devastation Hurricane Katrina caused”

The statement above suggests that the Hurricane Katrina disaster would have included better collaboration between the two stakeholders: the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA. This statement is true because there were significant inconsistencies in the role played by FEMA and that played by the Department of Homeland Security in managing the disaster. There was difficulty in dealing with dispersed responsibilities during the management of Hurricane Katrina because some of the response roles had to be approved by the Department of Homeland Security (Moynihan, 2009). There was particular attention to the chain of command, which prevented FEMA from performing various activities that would have been helpful. If these two organizations collaborated effectively, they would have managed the issues experienced during and after the hurricane more efficiently and effectively. Our assignment writing services will allow you to attend to more important tasks as our experts handle your task.

Core Tenets of the National Infrastructure Protection Plan

The first tenet of the National Infrastructure Protection Plan states that “Risk should be identified and managed in a coordinated and comprehensive way across the critical infrastructure community to enable the effective allocation of security and resilience resources.” (Department of Homeland Security, 2013, p.13) This tenet posits that information sharing between stakeholders is one of the most important components of dealing with disasters. Collaboration is required between individuals and organizations to effectively deal with the effects of emergencies. Hurricane Katrina would have been managed better if there had been better collaboration between agencies like FEMA, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Joint Field Office, among other stakeholders.  Effective communication would have helped all agencies to understand all information on the disaster and the roles it plays in mitigating its effects. The communication would have created more prompt responses leading to better management of the emergency.

References

Department of Homeland Security (2013). Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. Retrieved from: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/NIPP%202013_Partnering%20for%20Critical%20Infrastructure%20Security%20and%20Resilience_508_0.pdf

Moynihan, D. P. (2009). The response to Hurricane Katrina. International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, Switzerland.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Risk Communication – Hurricane Katrina

“Risk Communication” Please respond to the following:

Per the text, a poor working relationship between the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA contributed to the failed response to the devastation Hurricane Katrina caused. Take a position on this statement, and provide a rationale and examples for your response.
Per the e-Activity, analyze one (1) of the core tenets established in the National Infrastructure Protection Plan. Take a position on how closely following this tenet could have resulted in better protection of critical infrastructure during Hurricane Katrina. Provide a rationale for your response.