Research on Bystander Intervention

Research on Bystander Intervention

Article 1: Bystander Effect

Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589

Literature Review: The literature reviewed in this study is focused on examining bystanders’ role in responding to violence against women. The dominant ideologies within this literature review are the studies by Aronfareed, who believes that other forces are involved in people’s behavior and decisions, and the works of Rosenthal, who sought to understand why the 38 witnesses did nothing (Darley & Latane, 1968). Get in touch with us at eminencepapers.com. We offer assignment help with high professionalism.

Research Question/Hypothesis: Does the presence of more bystanders increase or decrease the desire of a bystander to help during an emergency, and does it deter a bystander’s willingness to intervene during a crisis? The hypothesis was that bystanders are only effective when alone but not when they are aware of the presence of other bystanders (Darley & Latane, 1968).

Methodology: The research methodology used in this study is experimental research (Darley & Latane, 1968).

Results: The outcome of the study made it evident that the increased or decreased number of bystanders impacts the decision and the speed at which bystanders react when one is in danger (Darley & Latane, 1968).

Conclusion: The presence of more or fewer bystanders is directly connected to the reactions of one bystander when a person is in danger (Darley & Latane, 1968).

Comprehensive Review

Rosenthal’s words greatly influence Darley & Latane’s (1968) work because it shape this study. A reader will note that from the beginning, the researcher starts his research with the case of thirty-eight witnesses. This sets the pace and lays the foundation for the researchers’ research. It is essential to note this because even as the researchers conduct their research, they will seek to answer the question raised in this work by Rosenthal to fill a gap left. This claim is confirmed by the research method that tested the reactions of bystanders when an individual is in danger. Similarly, the researchers were influenced by the works of Aronfareed, which show there are other factors influencing human behavior. A confirmation of this is seen in the fact that the study also tested the role of “alienation, Machiavellianism, acceptance of social responsibility, need for approval, and authoritarianism” (383) play in motivating people to behave.

Article 2: Bystanders’ Impact on Intimate Partner Violence

Mennicke, A. M., Bush, H. M., Brancato, C. J., & Coker, A. L. (2022). Bystander program to reduce sexual violence by witnessing intimate parental partner violence status. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 63(2), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.022

Literature Review: The reviewed literature in this research by Mennicke et al. (2022) sets the study’s direction, which is why most studies reviewed are interested in examining bystander intervention’s impact on violence.

Research Question/Hypothesis: Do bystander intervention programs minimize the levels of sexual violence among high school learners who have and have not witnessed intimate partner violence (IPV), and whether acceptance of violence acts as a mediator in these relationships? The researchers hypothesized that students who were given intervention training were better trained than the ones who were taken to a controlled school (Mennicke et al., 2022). The researchers also Methodology: The research method used in this study was experimental (Mennicke et al., 2022).

Results: When there were bystander intervention programs, several forms of sexual violence were reduced.

Conclusion: The research study showed that bystander training was practical. Its effectiveness was more manifest in reducing violent outcomes among those youth who witnessed IPV among their parents than among those who did not see IPV (Mennicke et al., 2022).

Comprehensive Review

This research done by Mennicke et al. (2022) is greatly influenced by the need to see the effectiveness of bystanders if used to reduce violence. This explains why the dominant literature in the literature review is the works of Coker et al. and Kettrey et al. These scholars study bystander intervention programs to reduce sexually motivated violence. Coker and his fellow researchers found that bystander intervention programs were effective. Minnick et al. were influenced by this study and chose to examine an area left by Coker’s analysis: the impact of bystanders’ intervention on intimate partner violence (IPV). The same idea is also seen in the research by Kettery et al., who generally examined the influence of bystander intervention programs. Even though the experiments are different, the conclusion is almost similar in the consulted literature because they show that this intervention could be effective if used in high-risk settings.

References

Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589

Mennicke, A. M., Bush, H. M., Brancato, C. J., & Coker, A. L. (2022). Bystander program to reduce sexual violence by witnessing parental intimate partner violence status. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 63(2), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.022

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Research on Bystander Intervention

Overview: This milestone will help you get started on the final project by selecting a classic and more current study and writing a detailed summary of each.
Prompt: First, choose a classic study from the Ten Classic Studies list. Second, find a more current study on the same general topic that was conducted and published in the past 10 years. For example, you could choose Milgram’s obedience study AND choose a modern study on obedience (for example, obedience in the workplace, military, or perhaps another setting).
Summarize each of the two studies in detail. Include the reference for each study. Your summary for each article should include information about the literature review, research question or hypothesis, methodology, results, and conclusion.
Guidelines for Submission: This summary should be a paper of about two double-spaced pages, submitted in Microsoft Word, with double spacing, 12-point

The article I have chosen from the list is Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility.
Please find a peer-reviewed article from the Shapiro Library.