Political Economies Matrix
Do you need any help for completing your assignment ? Contact us at eminencepapers.com. We endeavor to provide you with excellent service.
| Week 3 Matrix Assignment | |||
| Comparisons | United States of America (USA) | Russia | Germany |
| Type of political economy | The US has a capitalist political economy that emphasizes private enterprise and individual initiative. There is also a mix of government intervention in certain sectors. These include healthcare and education. The country’s economy is characterized by high levels of consumption, innovation, and economic inequality (Alon & Farreli, 2020). There is a strong focus on market-driven growth and global trade. | The political economy is characterized by a mix of state capitalism and authoritarianism. The government exerts significant control over the economy through state-owned enterprises and regulation (Alami & Dixon, 2020). The country’s economic policies have been criticized for favoring the ruling elite and stifling competition. The government has also been accused of restricting political freedoms and suppressing opposition. | The political economy is characterized by a social market economy. It combines elements of both capitalism and socialism (Kallert et al., 2021). The country has a highly skilled workforce and a robust welfare state. The government plays a role in regulating the economy and ensuring social protection. It also promotes competition and innovation. Germany is also known for its strong labor protections and cooperative industrial relations. |
| Availability of healthcare resources | Healthcare services in the USA are widely available. Access can vary depending on location, insurance coverage, and socioeconomic status. The country has a highly advanced healthcare system with top-notch medical facilities and highly trained professionals (Kostareva et al., 2020). However, many individuals still struggle with high costs and unequal distribution of services. | Healthcare services are available through a government-funded system that provides free or low-cost medical care to all citizens. However, the quality and availability of healthcare vary widely. Urban areas offer better facilities than rural regions (Kostareva et al., 2020). There is also a growing private healthcare sector. However, this can be expensive and is often only accessible to those with higher incomes. | There is a comprehensive healthcare system that provides universal coverage to all residents. These include foreign nationals. The system is funded through a combination of public and private sources (Kostareva et al., 2020). It offers a wide range of medical services and treatments. However, waiting times can be a challenge in some areas. Overall, healthcare in Germany is widely available and considered to be of high quality. |
| Access to healthcare | Access to healthcare services in the USA can be limited for some individuals. This is due to cost, lack of insurance coverage, and unequal distribution of medical facilities (Rupp et al., 2020). There are federal programs such as Medicare and Medicaid that provide assistance to certain groups. However, many people still struggle to access basic healthcare services. | Access is generally available to all citizens through a government-funded system. However, the quality and availability of medical care can vary greatly depending on location and socioeconomic status (Rupp et al., 2020). Some remote areas have limited access to healthcare facilities. Additionally, there is a growing private healthcare sector. This can be expensive and may not be accessible to everyone. | Access to healthcare services in Germany is widely available to all residents. There is a comprehensive healthcare system that provides universal coverage (Rupp et al., 2020). Waiting times for certain procedures can be lengthy. However, medical care is of high quality and accessible to all. It is not biased toward income or social status.
|
| Healthcare delivery system | The healthcare delivery system is a mix of public and private providers and payers. The government plays a role in healthcare through programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Private insurance companies and healthcare providers also play a significant role (Islam et al., 2020). However, the high cost of healthcare and uneven distribution of services can create challenges for many individuals seeking medical care. | The healthcare delivery system is primarily government-funded. There is free or low-cost medical care provided to all citizens through a national insurance system (Islam et al., 2020). However, the quality and availability of healthcare can vary widely depending on location and resources. Some areas lack access to adequate medical facilities and equipment. Private healthcare options are also available but can be expensive. | The healthcare delivery system is universal. It is a multi-payer system that provides comprehensive medical care to all residents. The system is funded through a combination of public and private sources. It offers a wide range of medical services and treatments (Islam et al., 2020). Medical professionals are highly trained. The system emphasizes preventive care and patient choice. |
| How Effective is the system? | The system is highly effective in terms of medical innovation and advanced technologies. However, its effectiveness is limited by issues such as high costs, unequal distribution of services, and a lack of access for certain groups. The system can also be challenging to navigate. Moreover, the quality of care can vary significantly depending on location and resources. | The effectiveness of the system is limited by issues such as unequal distribution of medical facilities and equipment. Furthermore, there are bureaucratic challenges and a lack of funding for healthcare services. The government-funded system provides universal coverage, but access to care can be challenging. Particularly rural regions. The quality of care can also vary widely. | The system is highly effective. It offers comprehensive medical care to all residents regardless of income or social status. The system is well-funded and emphasizes preventive care, and medical professionals are highly trained. While waiting times for certain procedures can be lengthy, overall, the system is widely considered to be of high quality. |
| Population health outcomes | Population health outcomes are mixed. The country has made significant progress in reducing mortality rates from many diseases (Meshram, 2020). However, it still lags behind other developed nations in areas such as infant mortality and life expectancy. Health disparities also persist. | Population health outcomes have improved in recent years but are still facing challenges. Life expectancy has increased. Mortality rates from many diseases have declined (Meshram, 2020). However, certain health issues such as alcohol abuse and smoking remain significant challenges. The country still faces a high burden of infectious diseases. | Population health outcomes are generally positive. There is high life expectancy and low mortality rates from many diseases (Meshram, 2020). The country has a strong focus on preventive healthcare. This has contributed to a relatively low burden of chronic diseases. However, certain health disparities exist, particularly among low-income and immigrant populations. |
References
Alami, I., & Dixon, A. D. (2020). The strange geographies of the ‘new ‘ state capitalism. Political Geography, 82, 102237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102237
Alon, I., Farrell, M., & Li, S. (2020). Regime type and COVID-19 response. FIIB Business Review, 9(3), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714520928884
Islam, M. T., Talukder, A. K., Badruzzaman, M., & Khan, M. A. H. N. A. (2020). Health service facilities are positively linked with the outcome of COVID-19 patients in majority of the countries: The global situation. J Adv Biotechnol Exp Ther, 3(4), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.5455/jabet.2020.d154
Kallert, A., Belina, B., Miessner, M., & Naumann, M. (2021). The Cultural Political Economy of rural Governors: Regional Development in Hesse (Germany). Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.017
Kostareva, U., Albright, C. L., Berens, E. M., Levin-Zamir, D., Aringazina, A., Lopatina, M., … & Sentell, T. L. (2020). International perspective on health literacy and health equity: Factors that influence the former Soviet Union immigrants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 2155. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062155
Meshram, S. S. (2020, December). Comparative analysis of life expectancy between developed and developing countries using machine learning. In 2020 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC) (pp. 6-10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IBSSC51096.2020.9332159
Rupp, M., Lau, E., Kurtz, S. M., & Alt, V. (2020). Projections of primary TKA and THA in Germany from 2016 through 2040. Clinical orthopedics and related research, 478(7), 1622. https://doi.org/10.1097%
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Develop a matrix that compares and contrasts the political economies in three selected countries. For each country, indicate the following: 1)
Political Economies Matrix
Type of political economy, 2) availability of healthcare resources, 3) access to healthcare, healthcare delivery system and efficacy, and population health outcomes. ***Use the Matrix Example provided***
Complete the order form and upload all of your files, including any instructions, rubrics, or other materials provided by your instructor. 
Complete the order payment after filling in the order form. We’ll receive your order and assign it to a writer.
The assigned writer will complete your paper and forward it to our Editing Team for review and approval.
Once approved by the editor, the completed paper will be uploaded to your account for you to download, review and approve.