Moral Rights And Organ Transplant

Moral Rights And Organ Transplant

A person who needs an organ transplant does have a moral right to obtain that transplant. Every person has the moral right to obtain an organ transplant. An organ transplant is a procedure where a person’s body organ is removed and inserted into another person who needs that organ to help save that recipient’s life. Every year, patients require an organ transplant. Organ transplant is a moral implication that brings us to question who will receive an organ (Tosh, n.d-a). The hope is that individuals who get an organ transplant will often live for many years. An ethical controversy argued that for an individual to get an organ transplant, a healthy person needs to undergo surgery and be cut open to remove their healthy organ. The doctor will need to harm a healthy person to save another’s life. All healthcare providers are bound to goodwill, a moral obligation to do good (Pence, 2021). Ethically, is it right to harm another human being to save another’s life? This decision is problematic in deciding who will receive an organ transplant. Every human’s life is precious in their own eyes; however, if the person is willing to donate their organ to another, they should have that right. Every human being deserves to be saved regardless of their good or bad lifestyle if the organs are readily available to all. Do you need help with your assignment ? Get in touch with us at eminencepapers.com.

How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them?

I believe that the people who will help our society should be a priority for an organ transplant. If a person is a drug addict or an alcoholic and does not care about destroying their organs, why should they get a transplant? They will destroy the new organ, and it would be a waste. According to utilitarianism, it is morally right for the patient to benefit from this surgical process (Pence, 2021). It would not be fair for the person who contributes to society to be second on the list while the alcoholic/drug addict is the priority to get the transplantation. Ethical debates will arise from this issue, but that would be the correct action to take to decide who should get an organ if it was a limited supply. The Libertarianism perspective supports my argument best. People who smoke cigarettes or do drugs should not receive organ donations over people who choose not to because poor health is their own doing (Tosh, n.d.-b). Organs should be donated to those individuals who have a higher survival rate.

References

Pence, G. (2021). Medical ethics: Accounts of ground-breaking cases (9th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Tosh, N. (n.d.-a). Annual ethics symposium: Transplant tourism [Video]. Canvas@WCU. https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/

Tosh, N. (n.d.-b). Week 6: Presentation [Video]. Canvas@WCU. https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

Does a person in need of an organ transplant have a moral right to obtain that transplant, supposing the availability of the needed organ?

How should we choose who gets a transplant, supposing that there are not enough organs for all who need them?

Please cite the textbook and any other source used in APA format.