Militarization of U.S. Police

The militarization of policing in America has increased tremendously over the previous three decades, drastically altering an already unstable culture in many law enforcement sections. As a result of this militarization, I decided to seek the advantages and cons of having a militarized police force in our textbook and on the internet for this week’s debate.

Police Militarization’s Advantages

The police can effectively manage dangerous situations. Sometimes, military-grade equipment is required to regain control of a perilous situation quickly. Such scenarios include riots and mass murders. When police officers have superior weaponry, they are more effective in dealing with dangerous circumstances.

Gunfire can be reduced by using military-grade vehicles. Despite their threatening appearance, military-grade vehicles can reduce gunfire. In those vehicles, police officers are safer than regular police. They won’t have to exchange fire with criminals since they’re safer, resulting in lives saved on both sides.

The Drawbacks of Police Militarization

It Is Dangerous to Use a Military Mindset on Citizens. One of the most serious drawbacks of police militarization is the danger of imposing a military mindset on civilians. The military considers the opposition to be a threat that must be defeated. Citizens, on the other hand, are persons who have rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. They are not your

The Police Have Low Standards. Another issue with police militarization is the low bar for becoming a police. If someone is going to oversee military-grade equipment, they must be responsible and emotionally stable. Some police officers abuse their authority and are unfit for such a job.

This prevents citizens from having a good relationship with the government. The police department is meant to have a positive connection with the public. They are responsible for protecting and serving the residents of their areas. When police are militarized, citizens are understandably afraid of them, especially when some misuse that militarization. Too many residents have been frightened by the SWAT squad breaking through their doors without warning or justification.

So, after weighing the advantages and disadvantages of police militarization, I’ve concluded that many persons imprisoned are fine people who have made mistakes, were unfairly arrested, or were guilty by association. As a result of their military mindset, police personnel occasionally employ excessive force. As a result, vigilance should be exercised while militarizing police forces. However, given the volume and nature of crime in the United States, some police militarization is required.

Reference

Militarization of U.S. Police? [Video].

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Please respond to the following:

Militarization of U.S. Police

View the video, Militarization of U.S. Police? [Video]. In the past decade or so, we have seen what is known as the “militarization of police.” This means that police agencies have been given old military equipment such as armoured vehicles, uniforms, and the like to address violent situations better.

What are your thoughts on this? In your opinion, does the militarization of police better help police address violent situations? Or is it a threat to the public when they respond to protests and the like with this equipment? Why or why not?