Intervention Program – Psychotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Intervention Program – Psychotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Introduction

Prisons play a vital part in the rehabilitation of prisoners in the concurrent society. The facility ensures that it creates the correct environment for rehabilitation by ensuring a sufficient program is created to work in the interests of the people. It is evident that the program focuses on the well-being of the prisoners by ensuring that the correct correctional action is taken for each prisoner. Mental disorders make up one of the numerous challenges experienced by prisoners. The correctional centers have had difficulty in developing the correct mechanism on how to appropriately deal with situations using the correct channels. The paper discusses different intervention programs that would best suit the three inmates.

Inmate 1

Psychotherapy would work best for the first inmate. Often known as talk therapy, it is a good treatment program that can be administered to the patient. It is a program that includes subsequent activities. In this case, the violent attribute of the prisoner could be attributed to antisocial behaviour. Activities such as violence and anger management are carefully looked upon to ensure that the inmate gets the correct treatment (McCord & Tremblay, 2012). Important matters such as substance abuse are put in place. Ideally, the prisoner would receive the right treatment through therapy sessions that would address the important concerns through the correct channels available. I recommend the intervention program be used in the first inmate based on her mental condition.

Inmate 2

The use of cognitive behavioural therapy best suits the story based on the high level of complexity involved in dealing with individuals with aggressive behaviours. The program entails the regulation of the individual’s emotions to ensure that the high level of aggression is controlled through effective channels (Fennell, 2015). Through the use of controlled trials, the prisoner would be given treatment sessions in a collective manner to enable him to deal with his issues in the most subsequent way. Revising the past, such as childhood experience, is a part of the program that makes it increasingly sufficient to learn and understand. Conclusively, cognitive behavioural therapy best suits the second inmate.

Inmate 3

The application of cognitive behavioural therapy would also work best in such a situation. The prisoner’s sudden change in behavior could be attributed to the low self-esteem that he has. In this case, cognitive restructuring would be applied to ensure that the correct process is used in the diagnosis process (McCord & Tremblay, 2012). The recognition of unhelpful thinking patterns would be applied. The negative thinking would then be replaced with positive thinking to ensure that the patients receive the correct set of treatment that is required by the patient. Additionally, the use of behavioural activation is helpful as it would enable the prisoner to connect with the positivity of life and change in behaviour in the most effective manner.

Conclusion 

In summary, the paper explains the correct interventions that need to be applied to the three inmates. The use of psychotherapy is advised based on the high level of effectiveness involved in the development of the correct processes while dealing with certain issues affecting the prisoners. The antisocial behaviour is well addressed. Additionally, cognitive behavioral therapy is effectively applied. In this case, it would serve both the second and third inmates based on the high level of understanding involved in the whole process. It is an effectual practice to ensure that the correct sceptics are applied in understanding certain concepts in the most effective way that is beneficial to the rehabilitation system.

References

Fennell, M. J. V. (2015). Overcoming low self-esteem: A self-help guide using Cognitive Behavioural Techniques. Surry Hills, NSW: Accessible Publishing Systems.

McCord, J., & Tremblay, R. E. (2012). Preventing antisocial behaviour: Interventions from birth through adolescence. New York: The Guilford Press.

Myles, P., & Shafran, R. (2015). The CBT Handbook.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

As a well-known expert consultant for all matters related to corrections, you have been asked to assist prison officials in making recommendations for specific treatment programs targeting inmates presenting with a wide variety of identifiable disorders. The correctional staff has openly admitted the difficulty they have experienced identifying intervention programs that properly address the needs of their inmates. Relying on your expertise in both the areas of clinical assessment of mental health disorders and co-occurring disorders, as well as your knowledge of treatment and intervention programs available to prison inmates, you have agreed to assist the staff with this problem.

Intervention Program – Psychotherapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

Your Role/Assignment

You are the outside consultant known for your expertise in the clinical assessment of mental health and behavioral disorders in common prison inmates. In this capacity, you have been asked to decide, based on the symptoms and your diagnosis, the type of intervention program that is likely to have the greatest impact on the inmate’s well-being. In your response, make sure to identify the problem and the mental health disorder, if one exists, using information from your text as well as information from credible Internet sources. Of special interest is your ability to recommend a specific program to assist this inmate in their attempts to complete a reentry program. Search the Internet for programs currently in use at state and federal correctional facilities and apply your findings to each of the following cases. Remember to examine the evaluation literature regarding the programs you select.
Key Players
Inmate #1

This inmate is a 25-year-old female convicted of second-degree murder in the killing of her intimate partner, also female.

The facts are:

A history of serious antisocial behavior beginning during childhood
Difficulty establishing and maintaining social relationships
A history of promiscuity
A substance use problem since age 12
Foster care reports she was difficult to manage and noncompliant in the home, problems which persisted when entering school
She had few friends and is thought to have a learning disability

Inmate #1
Inmate #2

This inmate is a 45-year-old male, a career criminal convicted of assault with intent to commit murder and sexual assault, charges stemming from an attack on a young female co-worker.

The facts are:

A history of “hot-blooded” aggressive acts
Displayed temper tantrums as a child that have continued into adulthood
Exhibits vengeful hostility towards other inmates and staff
On a limited basis, exhibits a lack of emotional control when angered
Was abused as a child
Parents were described as cold and harsh

Inmate #2
Inmate #3

This inmate is a 65-year-old male sentenced to prison for the murder of his business partner, an incident that occurred nearly twenty-five years ago. He has been a model prisoner throughout his stay but has recently shown signs of aggression toward other inmates and staff.

The facts are:

He is possessive of personal items and controlling in interpersonal relationships
He appears to be unreasonably jealous of other inmates and treats his cellmate like property
Exhibits behaviors commonly associated with conjugal paranoia
He considers himself inadequate and incompetent, and from testing, it has been learned he suffers from low self-esteem
He had an alcohol abuse problem before coming to prison and continues to present symptoms of substance use
He has poor communication skills