Harassment In The Workplace
The incident I will discuss this week occurred in a Chipotle restaurant. This sexual harassment case occurred between a female general manager and a 22-year-old male employee. The male employee accused and reported signs of sexual harassment, verbal and physical (non-verbal). He said to the EEOC that she “frequently discussed her own sex life and posting a daily ‘sex scoreboard’ in the main office concerning all the staff’s sex lives, the general manager told the young shift manager that she wanted to suck his genitals, watch him have sex with his girlfriend, and engage in a threesome. She also frequently slapped, groped and grabbed his privates.” (Elsesser, K, 2019). This was all new to the male employee, who referred to him as Melton in the article. This was Melton’s first real job out of high school. In most sexual harassment cases, you do not hear the male as the victim. Yet this does happen more than most think. 37% of males have reported experiencing sexual harassment in the workplace, yet only 16% of cases are filed with EEOC (Elsesser, K, 2019). The female general manager retaliated and told all the other employees not to speak to Melton and lock him in the walk-in freezer. Melton claimed a settlement of $95,000, and Melton also required Chipotle to improve either policy and retrain 27 different restaurants in the local area so nothing like this ever happens again. Just like Chipotle, we all should strive to create a work environment where all employees feel comfortable coming forward to report all unwelcome behavior.
Reference
Elsesser, K. (2019, December 10). Victim Locked In Freezer: Chipotle Settles Sexual Harassment Case. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2019/12/10/victim- locked-in-freezer-chipotle-settles-sexual-harassment-case/#6dee684a4c9d
[Author removed at the request of original publisher]. (2016, September 29). 3.2 Functions of Language. Retrieved from https://open.lib.umn.edu/communication/chapter/3-2-functions-of-language/
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question
Overview
For this Assessment, you will consider implicit and explicit messages, overt and subtle cues, and communication behaviors that should be addressed as unacceptable in the workplace.
Harassment In The Workplace
Submission Length: 4 items, with responses ranging from 1–2 paragraphs per item.
Professional Skills: Written Communication, Information Literacy, Engaging Multiple Social and Cultural Perspectives, and Inquiry and Analysis are assessed in this Competency.
Instructions
To complete the Assessment, do the following:
- Be sure to adhere to the indicated length for each item.
- Download the IQ1004 Written Response Template containing the rubric, and answer each question in 1–2 paragraphs.
- Download the Academic Writing Expectations Checklist to review before submitting your Assessment.
- Think of a time when you or someone you know either experienced or witnessed harassment in the workplace.
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission, and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria helps them direct their focus and use their time most productively.
All submissions must follow the academic writing expectations. Properly formatted APA citations and references must be provided where appropriate. Submissions that do not meet these expectations will be returned without scoring.