Evaluating Intelligence Tests- Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence Practical and Emotional Aspects and Binets Accuracy

Evaluating Intelligence Tests- Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence Practical and Emotional Aspects and Binets Accuracy

Multiple intelligences is defined as a theory that describes the various ways that individuals acquire and learn information (Zheng, 2019). This means that a human’s intelligence can be evaluated based on aspects such as tune with nature, physical movement, introspection, social interaction, music, pictures, numbers, and the use of words (Zheng, 2019).

According to the multiple intelligence inventory of Literacy Net (2021), I scored high in intelligence, including musical, self, body movement, and social, and low on language nature, spatial, and mathematics. The results are consistent with my perception of myself because I like reading while wearing emotion on my face depending on the book’s mood. I also like listening to music and singing, and I love poetry. I also like evaluating myself constantly, reflecting and thinking about other people’s actions and perspectives before deciding anything, and I also like doing physical exercise to keep fit. This is why I scored high in these areas. I like to be in a social setup and meet new people, but sometimes I like to spend time alone, and this explains why I scored average in social intelligence. I scored low on nature because I occasionally like being in a natural environment and do not pursue any mathematics-related course. The test was culturally fair because it does not require an individual’s details on their cultural background and beliefs, not ethnic or national origin.

By applying the multiple intelligences theory in educational settings, educators consider the various kinds of learners they might have in their classes and reinforce each student’s different types of intelligence (Gardner, 2021). This allows the individual student to learn and be able to utilize their specific abilities and demonstrate learning.

References

Gardner, H. (2021). Disciplined Mind: What All Students Should Understand. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Literacy Net (2021). Multiple Intelligence Assessment. https://www.literacynet.org/mi/assessment/cgi-bin/results.cgi

Zheng, R. Z. (2019). Examining Multiple Intelligences and Digital Technologies for Enhanced Learning Opportunities: Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design. Hershey: IGI Global.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Choose one of the following topics below and address the corresponding questions.
Option #1 – Intelligence Test
Base your answers on your observations about the intelligence test you took in the Unit Readings and Activities.
Were the concepts of fluid and/or crystallized intelligence demonstrated through the test you took? Why or why not? Provide examples from the test itself in support of your response.

Evaluating Intelligence Tests- Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence Practical and Emotional Aspects and Binets Accuracy

Did the test measure practical and/or emotional intelligence? If so, how? How did it not measure practical and/or emotional intelligence if not? Provide examples from the test in support of your response.
Was the test accurate in measuring intelligence, according to Binet? If so, how? If not, how was it not accurate? Provide examples from the test to support your answer.
How might this test have been culturally biased? Conversely, do you feel that it was culture fair? Provide examples from the text that support your perspective.
OR
Option #2 – Multiple Intelligences
What is meant by Multiple Intelligences?
Take the Multiple Intelligence Inventory and determine which intelligences you score “high” on and which you score “low” on. Are the results consistent with your perception of yourself? Why or why not?
Do you feel the test was culturally fair? Explain.
What applications do the theory of Multiple Intelligences have in educational settings?
Be sure to provide the URL link(s) and/or title(s) to any resource used as a reference in your post.