Need help with your Discussion

Get a timely done, PLAGIARISM-FREE paper
from our highly-qualified writers!


Evaluating a Newly Implemented Technology in Practice

Evaluating a Newly Implemented Technology in Practice

Evaluating a Newly Implemented Technology in Practice

Evaluation is analyzing the performance and efficacy of a newly installed technology by looking at the information and feedback channels used by stakeholders and actors engaged in achieving the desired outcomes. When new technology is utilized in a context, the reviewing team looks at how it affects workflow, efficiency, performance, patient values, and results. A comprehensive review analyzes the technology and the device’s worth from the technical, market, and consumer viewpoints and then reconciles the findings in a legitimate context. Reviewing newly deployed technology gives policymakers, health professionals, funding agencies, and health consumers the knowledge they need to evaluate the advantages and relative worth of health technologies and processes after they’ve been implemented in a setting.

The evaluation process involves systematic approaches to determine new technology’s impacts, properties, and effects. The evaluation process involves appraisal, assessment, and decision-making regarding the performance of new technology (Mishra et al., 2020). The evaluation team collects data, information, feedback, and critical reviews of scientific evidence produced during the assessment while utilizing the newly implemented technology. The appraisal phase involves a committee that reviews the check, considering all possible factors to make appropriate recommendations. The last step undertaken during valuation involves decision-making or implementation of the recommendations. The phase-only exists where a gap exists, and a correct decision must be made to reconcile the optimum results.

The evaluation process utilizes two main data collection methods: primary and secondary data methods (Safi et al., 2018). The primary data method collects information through observation studies and evidence from clinical trials. In contrast, Secondary data methods combine preliminary data with information from other sources like patient feedback to understand the performance of the technology. An example of an evaluation of technology is determining how insulin pumps have improved the health outcomes and quality of life for diabetic patients. Another example of evaluation is the study of the impacts of linear accelerators on the treatment and management of cancer and their influence on treatment sessions and individual needs.


Mishra, A. R., Mardani, A., Rani, P., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2020). A novel EDAS approach on intuitionistic fuzzy set for assessment of health-care waste disposal technology using new parametric divergence measures—Journal l of Cleaner Production, 272, 122807.

Safi, S., Thiessen, T., & Schmailzl, K. J. (2018). Acceptance and resistance of new digital technologies in medicine: a qualitative study. JMIR research protocols, 7(12), e11072.


We’ll write everything from scratch


Evaluating a Newly Implemented Technology in Practice

Evaluating a Newly Implemented Technology in Practice

How do you determine if the technology implemented was a success? Provide examples.

Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."

Order Solution Now

Our Service Charter

1. Professional & Expert Writers: Eminence Papers only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Eminence Papers are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Eminence Papers are known for the timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Eminence Papers, we have put in place a team of experts who answer all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.

Office Address: 2066 N Capitol Ave, San Jose, CA 95132, United States
UK Address: 2 Frederick Street, Kings Cross, London, United Kingdom, WC1X 0ND ©2023 All rights reserved. Terms of usePrivacy Policy Revision PolicyMoney Back Guarantee | Plagiarism Free Guarantee
We Can Write It for You! Enjoy 20% OFF on This Order. Use Code SAVE20

Stuck with your Assignment?

Enjoy 20% OFF Today
Use code SAVE20