Need Help With This Assignment?

Let Our Team of Professional Writers Write a PLAGIARISM-FREE Paper for You!

Ethical Decision-Making – Decision on Life and Death

Ethical Decision-Making – Decision on Life and Death

Our assignment writing help is at affordable prices to students of all academic levels and disciplines.

  1. Why do Christians believe that morality is absolute and objective rather than relative and subjective? If morality is objective, where do Christians get their moral standard? Cite Chapter 7 of The Beginning of Wisdom textbook and/or topic overview. Include the resources you use on a reference page at the end of this document.

Your answer in 75-100 words:

According to objective morality, there is a higher moral truth that transcends our human suppositions and decisions. Many of us are not concerned with objective facts but with good and bad depending on our subjective sentiments and personal convictions (Richard et al., 2021). In absolute morality, all actions are either characteristically wrong or right (Fuchs et al., 1971). Christians trust in absolute and objective morality on the grounds the Bible clarifies that God sets the moral laws (Richard et al., 2021). According to Romans 1:25 and Isaiah 45:19, People are not given the alternative of setting the norms of right or wrong as God has effectively done.
  1. Use the case you chose from the “Decision-Making Cases” document to answer the following questions to build the Christian ethical response. Use logical reasoning (general revelation). Cite Bible passages (special revelation), The Beginning of Wisdom textbook, and/or the topic overview. Include the resources you use on a reference page at the end of this document.

    1. Which case did you choose?
Decision on life and death
  1. Chapter 2 of The Beginning of Wisdom textbook and the Topic 1 Overview presents the elements of a worldview (ultimate reality, nature of the universe, humanity, knowledge, ethics, purpose). In the case you chose, which worldview element will be the biggest factor for determining right and wrong in the case you chose? Why?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

Ethics is the most integral part of determining wrong and right on account of deciding on life and death (Richard et al., 2021). Some would contend that ending a suffering person’s life demonstrates empathy (Christians et al., 2020), while Christians consider this act as murder.  Another issue to consider is that nobody ought to have the authority to decide when to end someone else’s life; medical professionals are sworn to protect and care for life and not to end it. (Anderson 2015). Additionally, the person suffering should not be permitted to make this kind of decision while in their perspective.
  1. How does the Christian worldview describe the worldview element you identified?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

Alluding to Isaiah and Romans, ethics can be viewed as equivalent to morals in Christianity’s worldview. Ethics are moral, religious theology, a framework or theory created by contemplating, interpreting, and assessing scriptural morals. These incorporate guidelines of conduct, moral codes, practices, norms, values, principles, and convictions associated with right and wrong, great and insidiousness. In Christianity, ethics are molded by Biblical revelations. Personal beliefs compromise subjective ethics and opinions, which is not reliable since everyone has their own beliefs and opinions. The law is set for us in the Bible, and that ought to be our guide.
  1. What are Bible passages (cite at most three) that will guide the ethics for the case you chose? How do these Bible passages apply to this case?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

In Genesis 1:27, “So God created human beings in His own image. In the image of God He created them; male and female He created them”. This verse states that humans are created as God’s reflections, which grants us innate worth and dignity for our lives. By taking one’s life or concluding that life does not merit experiencing, one is fundamentally dismissing this worth and poise bestowed on to them. In Exodus 20:13, God commands us, “You must not murder”, and any kind of deliberate ending of life is murder.
  1. Based on your answers to b and c, explain the Christian response to the case you chose. In other words, how might the Christian worldview resolve the issue?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

In James 1:2-4, “Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of all kinds for your faith produces steadfastness. And let steadfastness have its full effect, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing”. However, it may be difficult to rejoice in anguish; Christian ethicist Gilbert Meilaender expressed that maximized care is most pivotal contrasted to eliminating the enduring by death. Additionally, Stephen Phillips suggested that genuine consideration is holding one’s hand and enduring right alongside them, not taking their life or proposing they do so themselves.
  1. Your previous responses built a Christian ethical stance and provided a Christian resolution for the case. How might this Christian resolution to the issue increase human dignity and human value?

Your answer is 50-75 words.

Taking ethical consideration towards life would help prevent many deaths, especially suicides and murders, which are tragically rising every day. Learning just how precious life is, the consequences of taking it, and finding ways to appreciate every minute of life regardless of the challenges we face would change the world as we know it. People would also learn to treat each other with care and compassion, and violence would be unheard of.
  1. The Christian position that humans should flourish comes from the belief in the goodness of God. How so? What are the connections between God’s goodness and human flourishing?

Your answer in 50-75 words:

The idea of flourishing is characterized diversely in the Bible based on how our culture characterizes it. In Christianity, human flourishing is in living life the manner in which it was intended to be and not in having a “good life” (Myers et al., 2008). Referring to Psalms 19, nature prospers when it satisfies its God-glorifying goal by following the God-given course. The equivalent applies to humans; we will be happy and fulfilled when we live as indicated by our inclination and design (Tanner 2003).
  1. Considering the Christian resolution you built for the case and everyone involved in the scenario, what might be some benefits or unintended consequences that come from this resolution? What might be challenging for people to accept or do?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

The person in my case is quadriplegic-paralyzed from the neck down. Living life like this is not easy; all her essential needs will have to be done for her, which will require effort, commitment, and a lot of patience. A great deal of time and expenses will also go into taking care of her, which means the lives of people looking after her will change drastically (Machado et al., 2010). Nonetheless, Janie can still experience happiness and love since her brain is fully functional. She can live a decent life and have amazing experiences alongside those who care for her.
  1. What are some ways that Christians should be active in helping to alleviate the suffering related to this issue? Give specific examples of what ordinary people can do.

Your answer in 75-100 words:

People in the circumstances like Janie’s need constant care; one significant way that ordinary people can help is by volunteering to help out with essential tasks so that those dealing with the patient are free and not overwhelmed. Such chores incorporate shopping, cleaning the house, driving them around, doing laundry, and taking care of their gardens or lawns, among others (Bach et al. 1993). People would also help get equipment that such a patient would need, for instance, wheelchairs to move them around, cars that would support them, and renovating the house to accommodate them.

 References

Fuchs, J. (1971). The absoluteness of moral terms. Gregorianum, 415-458.

Richard, H & Jeff, J. (2021). The Beginning of Wisdom. An introduction to Christian Thought and life.

Myers, D.G., Eid, M., & Larsen, R. (2008). Religion and human flourishing. The science of subjective well-being, 323-343.

Tanner, K. (2003). Jesus, humanity and the Trinity: A brief systematic theology. Pro Ecclesia, 12(1), 10-108.

Christians, C. G., Fackler, M., Richardson, K. B., & Kreshel, P. J. (2020). Media ethics: Cases and moral reasoning. Routledge.

Anderson, R. T. (2015). Always care, never kill: How physician-assisted suicide endangers the weak, corrupts medicine, compromises the family, and violates human dignity and equality. The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, (3004).

Machado, W.C. A., & Scramin, A. P. (2010). Functional (in) dependence in the dependent relationship of quadriplegic men with their (un) replaceable parents/caregivers. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 44, 53-60.

Bach, C. A., &McDaniel, R. W. (1993). Quality of life in quadriplegic adults: A focus group study. Rehabilitation Nursing, 18(6), 364-367.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 


Ethical Decision-Making - Decision on Life and Death

Ethical Decision-Making – Decision on Life and Death

For questions 2-6, choose from the “Decision-Making Cases” document in the topic study materials. Use critical thinking as well as support from the topic study materials to answer the following prompts.

Why do Christians believe that morality is absolute and objective rather than relative and subjective? If morality is objective, where do Christians get their moral standard? Cite Chapter 7 of The Beginning of Wisdom textbook and/or topic overview. Include the resources you use on a reference page at the end of this document.

Your answer in 75-100 words:

Use the case you chose from the “Decision-Making Cases” document to answer the following questions to build the Christian ethical response. Use logical reasoning (general revelation). Cite Bible passages (special revelation), The Beginning of Wisdom textbook, and/or the topic overview. Include the resources you use on a reference page at the end of this document.

Which case did you choose?

In Chapter 2 of The Beginning of Wisdom textbook and the Topic 1 Overview, the elements of a worldview (ultimate reality, nature of the universe, humanity, knowledge, ethics, purpose) are presented. In the case you chose, which worldview element is going to be the biggest factor for determining right and wrong in the case you chose? Why?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

How does the Christian worldview describe the worldview element you identified?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

What are Bible passages (cite at most three) that will guide the ethics for the case you chose? How do these Bible passages apply to this case?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

Based on your answers to b and c, explain the Christian response to the case you chose. In other words, how might the Christian worldview resolve the issue?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

Your previous responses built a Christian ethical stance and provided a Christian resolution for the case. How might this Christian resolution to the issue increase human dignity and human value?

Your answer in 50-75 words:

The Christian position that humans should flourish comes from the belief in the goodness of God. How so? What are the connections between God’s goodness and human flourishing?

Your answer in 50-75 words:

Considering the Christian resolution you built for the case and everyone involved in the scenario, what might be some benefits or unintended consequences that come from this resolution? What might be challenging for people to accept or do?

Your answer in 75-100 words:

What are some ways that Christians should be active in helping to alleviate the suffering related to this issue? Give specific examples of what ordinary people can do.

Your answer in 75-100 words: