Ethical and Legal Implications of Product Safety in the Cosmetics Industry- A Strategic Analysis

Ethical and Legal Implications of Product Safety in the Cosmetics Industry- A Strategic Analysis

You are a general manager of a cosmetics firm. A study’s results reveal that your major brand might cause skin cancer. State whether this is lawful and ethical unlawful and unethical, or a mixture of the two, and what is the probable result for the company if it does nothing? Give your recommendations and why.

Companies are required by law to manufacture products that are safe for human consumption, which is why products need to be inspected before being released to the public to ensure that they do not pose any threat to customers (Howells, 2018). Manufacturers also have an ethical responsibility to produce safe products and refrain from willingly putting the products’ users at risk. Therefore, selling a brand that causes skin cancer is illegal because it violates the regulations on product safety. It is also unethical because it indicates that the company does not follow the procedure required to determine the product’s safety before selling it to consumers. If the company does nothing, the potential outcome is multiple lawsuits that could make the company pay heavy fines. The company also faces the risk of closure if it does nothing hence the need to act promptly and resolve the situation before it gets out of hand. I would recommend recalling the product in question and changing the raw materials used to manufacture the product to eliminate the risk of causing cancer. Our assignment writing services will allow you to attend to more important tasks as our experts handle your task. Get in touch with us at eminencepapers.com.

Due to a discrepancy in federal laws, you learn that you could lawfully pay your employees less than the minimum wage. Additionally, the cost savings you endorse could imply you’re receiving a choice promotion. State whether this would be lawful and ethical unlawful and unethical, or a combination of the two. What would you do? Explain your rationalization.

All workers have a right to a fair wage, which in most cases includes equal pay for the equivalent work done (Shildrick et al., 2012). The existence of a loophole in federal laws allowing employers to pay workers less than minimum wage legally is legal because it does not violate any laws. The employer can also justify the decision to pay workers less than the minimum wage by citing the loopholes that influenced his or her decision. It is, however, unethical to pay workers less than the minimum wage to save costs because the compensation needs to equate to work done to maintain operations in the organization. Therefore, the company or employer should consider other ways to save costs without implementing wage cuts to below minimum wage. I would be reducing the salaries of the top-paid employees to ensure that the company achieves the goal of saving costs without paying some employees below the minimum age.

References

Howells, G. (2018). Consumer product safety regulation. Consumer Product Safety, 1-60. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429462238-1

Shildrick, T., MacDonald, R., Webster, C., & Garthwaite, K. (2012). The low-pay, no-pay cycle: The perspectives and practices of employers and ‘welfare to work’ agencies. Poverty and insecurity, 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847429117.003.0004

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Below are some real-life situations that present ethical questions in a business. Discuss at least two situations (of course, you can discuss all of them) and look at them (a) from a strictly legal viewpoint, (b) from a moral and ethical viewpoint, and (c) from a point of view of what is best in the long run for the company.

Ethical and Legal Implications of Product Safety in the Cosmetics Industry- A Strategic Analysis

Look at each situation from the perspective of all groups concerned: customers, stockholders, employees, and the community, not just your own opinion of it.

Situations
You are a general manager of a cosmetics firm. The results of a study show that your major brand could cause skin cancer. From the different viewpoints stated above, is this legal and ethical illegal and unethical, or a combination of the two, and what is the potential outcome for the company if it does nothing? What would be your recommendations and why?
You have the opportunity to offer a job to a friend who really needs it. Although you believe that the friend could perform adequately, there are more qualified applicants. From the different viewpoints stated above, would this be legal and ethical illegal and unethical, or a combination of the two? How might you be viewed in the organization if you hire a less qualified person? What would you do? Explain your justification. Man’s shoes on the pavement with the words right and arrow and wrong and arrow going different directions.
You are the vice president of a beer company in a state that sets the legal drinking age at 21. Your boss asks you to organize a lobbying effort to have the drinking age reduced to 18. From the different viewpoints stated above, would this be legal and ethical illegal and unethical, or a combination of the two? Does this violate the company’s social responsibility to the state and/or surrounding towns? What would you do? Explain your justification.
Because of a loophole in federal laws, you find that you could legally pay your workers less than the minimum wage. The cost savings you recommend may mean you’re getting a choice promotion. From the different viewpoints stated above, would this be legal and ethical or illegal and unethical, or a combination of the two? What would you do? Explain your justification.
Discuss at least two situations. Be sure to consider both short‑ and long‑range consequences.

Please read: To help ensure you earn maximum points per the rubric, you need at minimum 3 posts over 3 different days of the week (1 initial post & 2 replies to classmates or your instructor). Example of the optimal discussion requirements: Post your initial post on Tuesday, one reply post on Wed, and one reply post on Thursday. Ensure you have an in-text citation and scholarly reference (other than your textbook) in your initial post. Posts such as those I agree with will not count. Good Luck.