DOC 714-Week 8 Discussion Post 1

Program of Study

DHA: Doctor of Healthcare Administration

Problem Statement

The problem is that factors contributing to poor access to mental healthcare and mental healthcare resources among ethnic minority groups, resulting in decreased consumption of mental healthcare resources and increased morbidity, mortality, and functional decline, have not been explored and thereby not adequately addressed (Snowden et al., 2022).

Purpose Statement

The purpose of this proposed qualitative study, using the case study design, is to explore the factors contributing to poor access to mental healthcare among ethnic

minority groups, and highlight potential address measures as perceived by the population.

Research Methodology and Design

The research methodology that will be applied in the proposed study is qualitative methods. Qualitative methods involve the collection and analysis of non-numerical data to describe the “why” behind a phenomenon or program (Bazen et al., 2021). This research methodology seeks to understand human experiences through diverse approaches. These include grounded theory, action research, ethnography, case studies, phenomenological studies, and narrative research. These approaches differ slightly in their perspectives but have similarities in interrogating a specific program or phenomenon. Regardless of the approach, qualitative methods are often naturalistic, flexible as they are adaptable to emerging patterns, and insightful as they gather responses and experiences from the participants. Qualitative methods utilize several data collection methods to analyze a phenomenon. These include observations, surveys, interviews, and secondary research, among others (Bazen et al., 2021).

Qualitative research methodology is best suited for the proposed research. This methodology will allow the researcher to have a deeper understanding of diverse aspects of mental health illnesses. By interrogating aspects of mental health across ethnic minority groups, such as communities’ perceptions and the underlying barriers to mental health illnesses and mental health utilization, the researcher can extrapolate the specific factors that contribute to poor access to mental healthcare. Likewise, the methodology will allow the researcher to analyze the program under scrutiny in the participants’ natural settings. This allows an in-depth understanding of personal and environmental factors that interplay in poor access to mental healthcare.

The research design that will be utilized in the proposed study is the case study design. Case study designs are qualitative research uniquely positioned to facilitate an understanding of an identified program, phenomenon, or subject. In this design, a researcher explores a phenomenon comprehensively in its natural setting (Sibbald et al., 2021). Case study designs can either be exploratory, explanatory, or descriptive. In descriptive case studies, the researcher gathers insights into a phenomenon in its natural setting. The purpose of this approach is to enhance understanding of the topic under scrutiny. In exploratory case study, the researcher analyzes a program to elucidate research questions that can be used to inform subsequent studies. Explanatory case studies explore the factors that cause or interplay in the development of a phenomenon (Priya, 2020). Regardless of the approach, case studies allow the researcher to have a deeper understanding of a phenomenon and can be applied whenever a researcher seeks to improve their knowledge base on a topic.

The case study design is the most appropriate design for the proposed study. This design will allow the researcher to better understand a program or a phenomenon. It is most applicable in situations where it is impossible or difficult to conduct experiments. It can also be used where the why and the how of a phenomenon are being sought by the researcher. In addition, this methodology is appropriate for the proposed research as it facilitates the interrogation of the underlying factors in poor access to mental healthcare among ethnic minority groups. Through this design, the researcher can comprehensively explore and discern specific factors influencing mental healthcare seeking and access among ethnic minority groups. Likewise, the method will facilitate the interrogation of inter- and intra-individual factors that interplay in mental healthcare seeking for ethnic minority groups, as well as those that predispose them to suffering attributed to mental health illnesses. This informed its use in the proposed research.

Research Questions

The research questions that will be utilized in the proposed research are “What are the factors contributing to poor access to mental healthcare among ethnic minority groups? How can the identified factors be addressed?”

Significance of the Study

The SPL model provides a pathway toward individual effectiveness in clinical research and scholarly activities. It employs a leadership alchemy, combining personal qualities, skills, and knowledge to build personal and professional networks and attain the widest possible reach by utilizing research (Smith & Wilkins, 2018). A reflection of the proposed research study through the lens of the SPL model reveals that the study is likely to be significant for the scholarly community as it builds on the knowledge base on mental healthcare, including aspects of mental healthcare resource utilization and access to mental healthcare. Findings from the study are likely to cement the scholarly beliefs on the causal factors for poor access to mental healthcare. The findings may also give insights into under-explored areas in mental healthcare access. Likewise, conclusions from the research may also widen scholars’ knowledge and perspectives on aspects of mental healthcare, thereby increasing the meaningful impact of their knowledge base in informing interventions for apparent challenges in mental healthcare.

The study is also likely to be significant for practitioners in mental healthcare. Findings from the study are likely to either challenge the normative approaches to addressing challenges in mental healthcare or affirm the position of current approaches utilized in managing these illnesses. Conclusions from the research may also give them insights into underexplored causal factors for poor access to mental healthcare. In their pursuit of better mental healthcare, they can employ a participatory approach to the research study to help inform potential improvement areas.

The study is also likely to be significant for nursing leaders and other healthcare leaders. The research forges a ground of commonality on healthcare improvement by postulating patient and population-specific areas that can be tapped into to elevate mental healthcare. Healthcare leaders, as change agents, utilize a dynamic approach to enhancing healthcare quality and efficiency of care delivery (Drew & Pandit, 2020). The research, by informing the potential areas of improvement, complements their role in quality improvement.

References

Bazen, A., Barg, F. K., & Takeshita, J. (2021). Research techniques made simple: An introduction to qualitative research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 141(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.11.029

Drew, J. R., & Pandit, M. (2020). Why healthcare leadership should embrace quality improvement. BMJ, m872. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m872

Sibbald, S. L., Paciocco, S., Fournie, M., Van Asseldonk, R., & Scurr, T. (2021). Continuing to enhance the quality of case study methodology in health services research. Healthcare Management Forum, 34(5), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704211028857

Smith, L. S., & Wilkins, N. (2018). Mind the gap: Approaches to addressing the research-to-practice, practice-to-research chasm. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 24. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000667

Snowden, L. R., Cordell, K., & Bui, J. (2022). Racial and ethnic disparities in health status and community functioning among persons with untreated mental illness. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 10(5), 2175–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-022- 01397-1

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

DOC 714-Week 8 Discussion Post 1

Week 8 Discussion Post 1

Review the significance of the study section in the College of Doctoral Studies Dissertation Guide and Alignment Handbook on CDS Central, Prospectus Guide, and Prospectus Template.

The significance of the study section explains why the study is a unique approach to the problem to be investigated, what the potential benefits from the proposed study are, and how the study results might make an original contribution to the field.

Consider the significance or importance of your study in relation to the SPL model.

Write a 275- to 300-word response to the following:

DOC 714-Week 8 Discussion Post 1

• How might your study be significant for the scholarly community?
• How might your study be significant for practitioners in your field of study?
• How might your study be significant for leaders in your field of study?