Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

In the context of mental health care, competing areas of need should be duly considered. Those include the manifold challenges faced by victims of poor mental health, the need to guarantee their well-being and the likelihood of the workforce becoming exhausted and thus unable to function at par. On the other hand, society does not always have enough funds to pay for all this. This paper presents an in-depth study of the selected healthcare problem, that is, the lack of mental healthcare workers, which has implications on the quality of service delivery, as presented in the first white paper. Further, it analyzes organizational policies and methods that are in place to lessen the degree of these problems while still adhering to their ethical standards.

Competing Needs Impacting Mental Healthcare

One of the primary competing needs in mental healthcare is the demand for services versus the availability of resources. Based on the discussions of the first part of the analysis, it is evident that mental health professionals are scarce, which results in more considerable delays for patients who seek to get help. It creates a dilemma in ways where the organization will be required to strike a balance between the need to provide urgent care amidst scarcity of resources and workforce capacity.

Another competing need arises in ensuring equitable access to mental healthcare while addressing disparities in service delivery. Although some people could face obstacles due to the lack of necessary amenities such as transportation facilities or a shortage of essential amenities, others may experience problems associated with socioeconomic factors and social identities. Accordingly, the organizational structure that is put in place should endeavor to offer such services to be as inclusive and accessible as possible (Broome & Marshall, 2021). However, the resource constraint still poses the most difficult challenge.

Relevant Organizational Policy

The increasing number of recent arrivals and the need to serve our existing clientele have led to new measures, which we have applied in the form of a telepsychiatry program expansion. By sharing technological objects, we seek to conquer geographical barriers and expand the benefit of mental healthcare to remote or under-serviced locations. Telepsychiatry performance teleconferencing practice and virtual presence at remote sessions make it possible for the organization to break the geographic barriers in terms of care recipients.

Ethical Considerations and Policy Critique

Increased use of technologies in telepsychiatry seems congruent with the organization’s primary mission, which involves enhanced service delivery. However, it entails ethical issues as well. One ethical dilemma is the possibility of digital divides that may aggravate the unfair access to technology, which has already worsened healthcare delivery inequalities. Furthermore, confidentiality and privacy in virtual consultations remain difficult and necessary for robust security and compliance with ethics guidelines. Despite those challenges, the main positive is that the policy can overcome a range of access factors and reach those who would otherwise have to pay much more. The use of technology can help the organization increase its outreach agility while having optimal resource use and employee productivity improvement.

Policy Recommendations

In order to build a complete mental wellness policy, recommendations are also suggested. For a start, the organization should appropriately train and deploy mental health caregivers in primary healthcare centers following the integrated care model proposed by Raney et al. (2021). This method allows for early spotting and optimal utilization of collaborative care in which the psychological burden on specialized mental health services and the number of new patients will fall.

Regarding the second issue, we advise the organization to prioritize projects to improve people’s health through social determinant factors by proposing or recommending one, as advocated by Deferio et al. (2019). Partnership with community organizations and advocating for laws that advance the practice of eradicating socioeconomic imbalances will be crucial as the system will become more equal, and not only the root causes of the issue but also the domains like employment and environment will have, through the above initiatives, been addressed.

Evidence-Based Support for Policy Recommendations

The subsequent policy decisions rely on scientific evidence because the application of evidence-based research to mental healthcare outputs confirms its effectiveness. For example, Raney et al. (2021) indicated that the delivery of mental health services was remarkably improved in primary care settings, leading to better patient results with acceptable accessibility of the services. Besides, Deferio et al. (2019) agree that the indispensable step to comparable health care and lowered disparities lies in overcoming socioeconomic factors of health.

In summary, the practically oriented solution to the nutrition and mental healthcare crises sets out the multifaceted approaches by taking into account the determinants such as preliminaries, interventions, and ethical considerations. The way to increase the display space to a changing number of telepsychiatry services and design and implement well-integrated care models will also be addressed, along with focusing on the betterment of social determinants of health initiatives. This will be a strong step in offering equal, accessible, and fair mental health care to every client. The policy recommendations, as expressed, are based on research and case studies involving people such as hospitals, resources, and workers. These recommendations are still ethical with the intention of producing a quality and safer healthcare system.

References

Broome, M. E., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader. Springer Publishing Company.

Deferio, J. J., Breitinger, S., Khullar, D., Sheth, A., & Pathak, J. (2019). Social determinants of health in mental health care and research: A case for greater inclusion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(8-9), pp. 895–899. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz049

Raney, L., Bergman, D., Torous, J., & Schmittdiel, J. (2021). Integrating mental health and technology in the primary care setting: A review with recommendations for overcoming challenges. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(12), 3811–3818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07112-5

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Add a section to the 2-3 page paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following in 1-2 pages:

Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.

Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.
Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you with quality feedback.