Comparison and Contrast between Driverless Cars and Traditionally Driven Cars

Comparison and Contrast between Driverless Cars and Traditionally Driven Cars

It is intriguing how locomotives’ scientific revolution and invention have evolved from the 20^th Century to the modern era of futuristic vehicles. After Frank and Charles designed the first gasoline automobile in the 1890s, grand designs were made to reach where we are, the brink of ceasing the usage of traditional cars to driverless cars. Doubtless, both of these vehicles have merits and demerits of their own. With this knowledge in mind, it suffices to maintain the comparison and contrast between driverless and traditionally driven cars, which is apparent based on these merits and demerits.

One merit of driverless cars is the convenience they pose. The proponents of driverless vehicle technology believe that consumers of this technology will have convenience, in this case, rather than tiring themselves with watching the road and increasing the likelihood of being in an accident when a driver falls asleep since the car is driverless. As such, it allows one to do other things apart from driving. It would allow people to catch up on online meetings if they were late or catch a quick nap on the way to work.

Another merit of driverless cars is increased road safety. Subsequently, it is imperative to understand that most accidents today are caused by cars when they engage in drunk driving and speeding on rural roads (Speiser, 2015). Conversely, Ford, Uber, Lyft, and Google strongly defend self-driven cars in their postulation that autonomous vehicles are way safer than traditionally driven ones. They are equipped with software that makes speed and spatial calculations with plausible accuracy and precision, significantly removing driver error and preventing crashes.

However, regardless of these factors, these vehicles have potent limitations that point to their demerits. One demerit of driverless cars is that these vehicles follow the rules of the road precisely; hence, they are entirely incapable of predicting human behavior (Pratt, 2016). As such, despite the much-publicized safety they will possibly bring to the fore, they could just as well be involved in many more accidents due to the failure to predict what humans would do next.

On the other hand, driving a car by oneself is that there is flexibility. In this case, one can stop at a point of their choosing and take any road that befits the drivers’ hours of commute. People prefer traveling at their own speed to get to a certain point on time. Further, it gives people the chance to carry their family with them and drop them at their desired location. Besides, sitting behind the wheel offers the driver a good view of nature and buildings as they travel down a country road or the city.

Another demerit of driverless cars is their cost during purchase and maintenance. Subsequently, the money needed for a car to run efficaciously could often be more in the course of time. Due to wear and tear, the costs are often high, which would inadvertently increase maintenance expenses. Inasmuch as a section of people would maintain that these problems are in both the self-driven vehicles and the traditional ones, it is clear that through the software in the self-driven cars, one will be in a position to reduce by a large degree, in comparison to the traditional cars.

Lastly, this form of car is not suitable for those who travel together over long distances and might fall asleep and risk accidents. It is not conducive for persons with a disability, such as the blind, the lame, and the elderly. These people who have these challenges would no doubt choose to buy self-driven vehicles.

In conclusion, there is a clear, broad contention concerning adopting futuristic self-driven cars and sticking to traditional driving. In this case, it would be much better if vehicles had software to help traditional driving be more efficient but not make the entire care self-driven. By so doing, it would be easier for one to rest and also be in a position to drive by themselves.

References

Pratt, M. (2016). Traditional Cars vs. Self-Driving Cars: Is Total Automation Inevitable on Our Roads – Umbrella. Umbrella – Your Go-To Insurance Guide. https://bit.ly/3CUsq5x

Speiser, M. (2015). This map shows what causes the most fatal car crashes in each US state. Business Insider. https://bit.ly/

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Competency

Implement critical thinking and research strategies for clear communication of written ideas.

Instructions

Produce a complete 2-4 page paper in which you compare and contrast driverless cars and/or traditionally driven cars. Be sure to define your reason for writing (thesis) and treat both ideas equally, including pros and cons, costs to promote, validity, efficiency to use, probability of success, manpower requirements, etc.

Comparison and Contrast between Driverless Cars and Traditionally Driven Cars

Your paper should contain an introductory paragraph, thesis statement, and body paragraphs, each supporting a major idea regarding your point for writing, and a concluding paragraph to wrap up the paper and signal the completion of your support for your reason for writing.

Although actual research is not a part of this assignment, provide a brief statement at the beginning of the assignment explaining how you would have gone about finding and providing support for your paper.