Communication Dilemma

Explain how you would you go about communicating this email, and to whom you would report to. Speculate the implications of simply ignoring the email and determine how this might impact the process of investigating security incidents.

The communication dilemma involved an incriminating email that was misdirected. The fact that the information was sent by mistake plays a key role in this aspect. As an employee, the main action that I would take is to report the case to the necessary authorities. The action would lead to the creation of validated information that would properly aid the collection of information that is important to prosecute the involved parties (Kahan, 2017). Reporting the case to the manager is necessary because it is part of the protocol that needs to be observed. On the other hand, ignoring the information might yield results that might appeal properly to the concerned individuals. The ignorance may lead to the occurrence of a tort, which may affect the company negatively. The law also allows the prosecution of such an action under the notion of withholding information that led to the occurrence of crime in the company.

Reference

Kahan, D. M. (2017). Ignorance of the law is an excuse–but only for the virtuous. Michigan Law Review, 96(1), 127-154.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Communication Dilemma

Please respond to the following:

Communication Dilemma

As an employee, you receive an email that was misdirected. The content of the email implies that the sender of the email is involved in criminal behavior involving your company.

1. Explain how you would you go about communicating this email, and to whom you would report to. Speculate the implications of simply ignoring the email and determine how this might impact the process of investigating security incidents.

• Interpret this situation from a security point of view and outline the process you would follow in collecting evidence while investigating this case.