Childhood Trauma and COVID-19 Impacts on Memory and Cognition
Response 1
Your proposal on the impact of COVID-19 on memory and cognition, particularly through the lens of dream recall and nightmares, presents a compelling argument that is well-supported by relevant theories and research.
Strengths and Areas for Clarification
The proposal has been well presented, and it is especially important how you connected the pandemic’s psychological effect on the population with the alterations in dreams. Your use of memory consolidation and Freud’s self-organizing theory creates a strong theoretical base that enables you to show how these cognitive functions occur in dreams. Moreover, the use of recent data like WHO data showing rising rates of anxiety and depression, is a good way to link your discussion to current issues.
On this note, however, more elaboration could prove to be beneficial to your proposal, especially in terms of explaining how memory consolidation influences the content of the dream. Although you speak about the position of emotional stress, offering more detailed descriptions or instances could demonstrate how these procedures are interrelated more comprehensively. Furthermore, incorporating the criticism or supporting evidence in psychoanalytical theory, especially Freud’s self-organizing theory, would have helped build a better argument.
Remaining Questions and Proposal Completeness
Some remaining questions include how individual differences (e.g., pre-existing mental health conditions and resilience factors) might moderate the relationship between COVID-19 stress and dream patterns (Filindassi et al., 2022). Additionally, exploring potential interventions or coping strategies for managing these nightmares and memory distortions would be valuable.
Your proposal meets most requirements outlined in the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric, including a clear problem statement, relevant theoretical frameworks, and contemporary relevance. However, ensuring that your potential improvements and methodological principles sections are as detailed and comprehensive as other parts of your proposal will make it even stronger.
Influence on My Understanding
Your work has significantly influenced my understanding of the link between global stressors and individual cognitive processes. It highlights the importance of considering both biological and psychological factors in cognitive psychology, encouraging me to look deeper into how external events can profoundly impact mental health and cognition (Wright et al., 2019). This perspective is invaluable for my own research, which also deals with the interplay between environmental factors and cognitive functioning.
References
Filindassi, V., Pedrini, C., Sabadini, C., Duradoni, M., & Guazzini, A. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 First Wave on Psychological and Psychosocial Dimensions: A Systematic Review. COVID, 2(3), 273–340. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid2030022
Wright, C. D., Tiani, A. G., Billingsley, A. L., Steinman, S. A., Larkin, K. T., & McNeil, D. W. (2019). A Framework for Understanding the Role of Psychological Processes in Disease Development, Maintenance, and Treatment: The 3P-Disease Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02498
Response 2
Your exploration of childhood trauma and its connection to adult incarceration provides a comprehensive and insightful examination of a critical issue in cognitive psychology.
Strengths and Areas for Clarification
One of the strengths of your proposal is the integration of Bowlby’s Attachment Theory and Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory to explain the long-term impacts of childhood trauma. This dual-theoretical approach effectively illustrates how early developmental disruptions can lead to later criminal behavior. Your detailed explanation of performance issues and limitations, particularly the evolving mental health issues and criminogenic tendencies, adds depth to the problem statement.
However, the proposal could benefit from additional clarification on the specific interventions that could address these early traumas. While you suggest early identification and therapy, providing concrete examples of successful programs or case studies could illustrate how these interventions can be implemented effectively. Additionally, expanding on the bi-directional nature of social bonds and how they might be repaired or strengthened could further enhance your discussion.
Remaining Questions and Proposal Completeness
Some remaining questions include how different types of traumas (e.g., emotional vs. physical abuse) specifically affect cognitive development and criminal behavior. Moreover, exploring the role of societal and cultural factors in shaping these outcomes would provide a more holistic view.
Your proposal meets the essential elements required by the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric, including a well-defined problem, relevant theories, and a discussion of contemporary relevance. Ensuring that your sections on potential improvements and methodological principles are as detailed as the theoretical background will enhance the overall completeness (Ven et al., 2019).
Influence on My Understanding
Your work has informed my understanding of the long-term cognitive and behavioral impacts of childhood trauma. It underscores the importance of early intervention and the role of social and emotional bonds in cognitive development (Matte-Landry et al., 2022). This perspective is crucial for my research, which also examines the impact of early experiences on later cognitive outcomes.
References
Matte-Landry, A., Grisé Bolduc, M.-È., Tanguay-Garneau, L., Collin-Vézina, D., & Ouellet-Morin, I. (2022). Cognitive Outcomes of Children With Complex Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Longitudinal Studies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 152483802211114. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221111484
Ven, M. C. J., Heuvel, M. I., Bhogal, A., Lewis, T., & Thomason, M. E. (2019). Impact of maternal childhood trauma on child behavioral problems: The role of child frontal alpha asymmetry. Developmental Psychobiology, 62(2), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21900
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question
Respond to your peer’s initial post and offer constructive feedback to address the following:
What areas of the proposal work well?
Childhood Trauma and COVID-19 Impacts
What areas of the proposal could benefit from additional clarification?
What remaining questions do you have related to your colleague’s chosen topic and proposal?
Does the proposal contain all the required elements as outlined in the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric document?
In your post, also discuss how your peer’s work influences or informs your own proposal or your understanding of your topic. Keep in mind that the intent of your peer review is not to provide your classmate with a number or letter grade. Instead, you are providing written feedback as to the question prompts noted above.