Characteristics of Leader Effectiveness

Characteristics of Leader Effectiveness

The Characteristics by Which the Effectiveness of an Assistant Coach, a Teacher, and a Minister Might Be Evaluated

According to Sonmez Cakir & Adiguzel (2020), leadership effectiveness is a leader’s performance in influencing and directing their activities to realize specific objectives. Influential leaders perform exceptionally well in their leadership roles and set an excellent example for other leaders. One of the characteristics by which the effectiveness of an assistant coach might be evaluated is being a team builder. An assistant coach must empower the team members to perform to the best of their abilities and ensure that all team members and the main coach work towards meeting the team’s objectives. Team building also includes creating passion among team members to increase their commitment. The second characteristic is being goal-oriented. Team members work together to meet a common goal in a competitive environment, hence the need for an assistant coach to be goal-oriented to set definable, clear goals to keep the team united in working to meet a shared goal. For example, an associate coach may set short-term goals such as winning matches and improving a team’s rank.

Furthermore, the teaching profession includes equipping people with knowledge and skills and motivating learners to improve their performance. Therefore, effective leadership in the teaching profession has improved performance and commitment to becoming a better person. One of the characteristics that might be used to assess the leadership effectiveness of a teacher is the ability to lead by example. Teachers must set a good example to learners to achieve the required results, such as high discipline and good academic performance. The second characteristic is good decision-making. The learning environment includes making fast and difficult decisions regularly to improve performance. For example, a teacher may be required to decide how to discipline a student who misbehaves during the teaching sessions. The third characteristic is good communication skills. A teacher requires good communication skills to pass relevant information to learners, ask intelligent questions, and solicit new ideas and input.

Finally, being a minister includes leading a large group of people and making complex decisions on what should be done. One of the characteristics that can be used to assess the leadership effectiveness of a minister is transparency. Ministers should be open about how they use public resources and their vision. An influential minister should also be accountable for their mistakes because they are answerable to the citizens. The second characteristic is decisiveness. Ministers make critical decisions that influence a large group of people. Hence, there is a need for good judgment, welcoming differing opinions, and appreciating informed input. The third characteristic is being visionary. Ministers need to look ahead and establish a good sense of direction to improve their ministries. They also need to plan strategically to ensure that long-term goals are met within their term as ministers.

The Ethical Issues or Challenges Associated With Prioritization

One of the ethical issues associated with prioritization is biases. According to Norheim (2016), biases distort priority setting. For example, an individual may prioritize the things that are interesting or easy to tackle and ignore essential things that should be at the top of the priority list. One of the biases is the singularity and identifiability effect. Hofmann (2020) argues that singularity makes an individual ignore the principles of priority setting, such as effectiveness, severity, and efficiency, thus bypassing established policies and procedures. The second bias is rejection dislike, which arises when an individual does not want to feel rejected (Hofmann, 2020). Therefore, an individual may prioritize tasks or activities to please others even though the outcome places some people at a disadvantage. For example, in a hospital, a doctor may prioritize assisting a public figure to avoid being disliked by colleagues and the person, even though doing so puts the lives of patients with more severe health issues at risk. The second ethical issue is conflicts of interest (Hofmann, 2020). An individual may prioritize based on the interests they want to meet. It may also be challenging to exercise fairness in priority settings because fairness would imply that the needs of all affected parties are considered. The third ethical challenge in prioritization is discrimination. For instance, the majority’s priorities may be addressed before the minority, thus creating discrimination.

The Extent to Which There Are Unique or Similar Characteristics across Different Roles and the Extent to Which the Criteria Are Measurable

Different roles require some attributes based on the environment and the people an individual interacts with. For example, being goal-oriented, leading by example, and having good communication skills might identify the assistant coach, minister, and teacher role. For instance, teachers set academic goals for their learners, ministers set goals for their subordinates in the ministry, and a coach sets goals for the team members. The goals should be clearly communicated, hence the need for good communication skills. Leading by example is applied in developing a good example based on the direction the teacher, coach, or minister wants subordinates to follow. However, transparency may only be identifiable in the role of a minister and assistant coach because the two roles require answering to the people on how resources are used and the efforts being made to meet stakeholders’ expectations. The criteria are highly measurable based on a review of the roles and responsibilities of the individuals in the different positions and to whom they answer.

References

Hofmann, B. (2020). Biases distorting priority setting. Health Policy, 124(1), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.010

Norheim, O. F. (2016). Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: Challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services. BMC Medicine, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4

Sonmez Cakir, F., & Adiguzel, Z. (2020). Analysis of leader effectiveness in organization and knowledge sharing behavior on employees and organization. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824402091463. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914634

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

BUS660 Ashford University Characteristics of Leader Effectiveness Discussion
The purpose of this assignment is to examine similarities and differences in characteristics of effectiveness for several familiar leadership roles. In a three- to four-page paper (excluding the title and reference pages)

Characteristics of Leader Effectiveness

Identify the characteristics by which the effectiveness of the following leaders might be evaluated: an assistant coach, a teacher, and a minister. Prioritize and explain the rationale for these characteristics.
Discuss the ethical issues or challenges associated with prioritization.
Compare and contrast the extent to which there are unique or similar characteristics across the different roles and the extent to which the criteria are measurable. For example, some of the traits you might identify for the role of assistant coach might include the leadership behind a team’s win-loss record, player perceptions, team morale, etc.
Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center, and it must include citations and references from the text and at least two scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library.