Bonds and Provisions

You want to invest in bonds. Examine whether or not each provision listed will make the bonds more or less desirable as an investment: call provisions, convertible bond provision, subordinate debt.

Bond investment remains guided by some provisions that favor the interests of both the issuer and the buyer. As a buyer, the implications of some provisions may damage the manifested sense of confidence in the bond; attributes such as call provision introduce a sense of uncertainty in the investment money. Call provision clauses allow the issuer to recall or buy back the bond before the maturity period. In essence, the implication of such outcomes on the buyer implies the potential of the investment not achieving the desired outcome (Tewari et al., 2015). Also, they suggest a possibility of the issuer misusing the bond to generate income while not committing to meeting the expectations of the buyers.

The element of a convertible bond provision in the description of the buyer’s interests tends to rest on the performance of the involved firm. Primarily, the buyer seeks to define the bond relationship with the company along with a time-bound model. However, the introduction of a bond conversion provision seeks to extend the shared relationship to a further step (Carbó-Valverde et al., 2017). Most buyers translate the decision to offer shares in exchange for the bond repayment as an indicator of poor company operations and financial management performance. As a result, buyers tend to distance their investments from bonds with conversion clauses.

The input of a subordinate clause in the bond regulations seeks to regulate the security attached to the product. In most cases, investors considered the integration of the subordinate clause to suggest a lack of prioritization of their investment in case of a financial mishap. Security plays a central role in defining the ambitions of any investment (Agénor & da Silva, 2017)). Bonds with a subordinate debt clause share a declining security impression among the buyers. As a result, their popularity tends to decline in contrast to bonds without a subordinate debt provision.

References

Agénor, P. R., & da Silva, L. P. (2017). Cyclically adjusted provisions and financial stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 28, 143-162.

Carbó-Valverde, S., Rosen, R. J., & Rodríguez-Fernández, F. (2017). Are covered bonds a substitute for mortgage-backed securities? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20(3), 238-253.

Tewari, M., Byrd, A., & Ramanlal, P. (2015). Callable bonds, reinvestment risk, and credit rating improvements: Role of the call premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 349-360.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question