Annotated bibliography -Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Patient Repositioning in Preventing Pressure Injuries

Annotated bibliography -Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Patient Repositioning in Preventing Pressure Injuries

Gillespie, B. M., Walker, R. M., Latimer, S. L., Thalib, L., Whitty, J. A., McInnes, E., & Chaboyer, W. P. (2020). Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009958.pub3

This article aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of patient repositioning in preventing pressure injuries. It was a Cochrane search of randomized clinical trials. Eight RCTs and two economic analyses involving 3941 participants were analyzed. These studies compared repositioning frequencies and tilt positions. The study revealed that the evidence to support the use of one reposition frequency and position is limited. Hence, there is no evidence to support a particular positioning or frequency of repositioning. This article is a scholarly source. The author’s names and affiliations have been included. Additionally, this article has been published in the Cochrane Library. The data has been presented in table form, and the language is professional. This article is long enough, more than five pages, and has included references and cited sources. This article applies to my research on the prevention of bedsores. Even though the study participants were repositioned at frequent intervals, some still developed pressure ulcers. Repositioning is essential in managing pressure ulcers, but careful monitoring of the skin condition is still required to help prevent bedsores. Hire our assignment writing services in case your assignment is devastating you.

Rae, K. E., Isbel, S., & Upton, D. (2018). Support surfaces for the treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers: A systematic literature review. Journal of Wound Care, 27(8), 467-474. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.8.467

This article aimed to compare the effectiveness of active and reactive mattresses in preventing and treating pressure ulcers. A literature search was done in Medline Plus, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials and nine systematic literature reviews were included in this study. The consensus from this review was that pressure mattresses are an effective strategy to prevent and treat pressure ulcers. These mattresses are more effective than standard-form mattresses. However, comparing active and reactive mattresses was inconclusive in determining which mattress was more effective. This article is scholarly because the authors’ names and affiliations have been included, and it has been published in an academic journal, the Journal of Wound Care. The data has been presented in table form, and the language is professional. This article is long enough and more than five pages; it has seven pages, including references to the cited sources. This article applies to my research as it has revealed that pressure mattresses effectively prevent and treat bedsores.

Moore, Z. E., & Patton, D. (2019). Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006471.pub4

Assessment of the risk of pressure ulcers is critical in identifying individuals at risk of developing bedsores. Many international guidelines recommend using a risk assessment tool to prevent pressure ulcers. There are many risk assessment tools. This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of risk assessment tools in reducing pressure ulcers. It involved reviewing different risk assessment tools.  The study concluded that there are no significant differences in preventing pressure ulcers when risk assessment tools are used compared to clinical judgments. This article is scholarly since it has the authors’ names and affiliations. Also, this article has been published in the Cochrane Library. The data has been presented in table form, and the language is professional. This article is long enough, more than five pages, including references to the sources cited. This article is relevant to my research on preventing bedsores in acute care settings. The review has reviewed that risk assessment is essential in preventing pressure ulcers. Nurses must, however, not rely on structured risk assessment tools but should combine them with clinical judgment.

References

Gillespie, B. M., Walker, R. M., Latimer, S. L., Thalib, L., Whitty, J. A., McInnes, E., & Chaboyer, W. P. (2020). Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009958.pub3

Moore, Z. E., & Patton, D. (2019). Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006471.pub4

Rae, K. E., Isbel, S., & Upton, D. (2018). Support surfaces for the treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers: A systematic literature review. Journal of Wound Care, 27(8), 467-474. https://doi.org/10.12968/

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Select three of the ten references from your Reference List assignment. Create an annotated bibliography for each of the three references.

Each annotation must have 150-200 words, making a total of 450-600 words for the entire assignment. Each annotation should have the following elements:

Annotated bibliography -Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Patient Repositioning in Preventing Pressure Injuries

APA style reference of the article being annotated
A paraphrased summary of the article (See note on paraphrasing below.)
An assessment of why it is a scholarly reference
A reflection on how it is applicable to your research
Note: Go to the Student Success Center and search keywords “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies” for help with this assignment.

Note on Step 2 Paraphrasing: Paraphrasing the ideas of others is a requirement in academic writing and graduate study. Paraphrasing is using your own words to restate ideas or information from source material. As you write each annotation, use the following paraphrasing guidelines.

There are three main steps to paraphrasing:

Identify the original idea(s) in the article
Identify general points regarding the idea(s)
Summarize the general points of the article in your own words
Follow the steps above for all three references you chose.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.