Analyzing Crime Causation Theories and Ethical Practices in Dallas, TX Courts

Analyzing Crime Causation Theories and Ethical Practices in Dallas, TX Courts

There is no single crime causation theory that could be the sole contributor to offending since many factors contribute to crime. Dallas, Texas, just like other cities, experiences crime resulting from several causation factors, which may be attributed to different theories. However, looking at the nature of offending in Dallas, the strain theory, a sociological theory, emerges as a great contributor to crime. The theory posits that people engage in crime due to the stress they undergo (Özdemir & Öner-Özkan, 2017). Committing a crime helps such people to escape from or reduce the strain they are undergoing. For instance, an individual may steal because they are undergoing financial stress, and to them, stealing could help them alleviate the struggle.

Considering the nature of the strain crime causation theory, courts may implement administrative best practices and ethical decision-making to correct offenders and improve their plight. One of the strategies courts may adopt is restorative justice. Instead of granting offenders jail time, the courts should pursue alternative means to address the underlying contributors to offending and reintegrate them back into society (Liebmann, 2007). For instance, organized dispute resolution, community service, and rehabilitation will potentially alleviate the strain that may have led to offending.

Conflict of interest is one of the issues that may necessitate the intervention of a court employee. A conflict of interest occurs when a jury member, a public attorney, or a judge has a personal or financial interest in a case to the extent that the court decision will affect them. If there is a conflict of interest involving a judge, the law society or association of attorneys may intervene and demand that the judge be replaced. The instance above shows that judges should be held accountable. To that end, public scrutiny emerges as one of the most viable ways to hold judges, attorneys, and court professionals to account.

Courts require progressive improvement, and diverse representation is one of the best ways to improve courts. Diversity implies ensuring judges and court professionals represent various cultures, ages, and religions consistent with a country’s population. For instance, nine justices in the US Supreme Court should represent all cultures to ensure diversity and objectivity in decision-making.

References

Liebmann, M. (2007). Restorative justice: How it works. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Özdemir, F., & Öner-Özkan, B. (2017). The nature of crime: different approaches toward the causes of the criminal act. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi (NPD), 5(11), 345-361.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Which crime causation theory is prevalent or trending in use in the courts in the Dallas, TX area? What is the name and basis of this theory? According to this crime causation theory and your research, which ethical decision-making strategies and administrative best practices would you recommend to the courts in your area to improve public policies and society?

Analyzing Crime Causation Theories and Ethical Practices in Dallas, TX Courts

Courts have procedures in place for handling cases with honesty and integrity and for ethically managing individuals involved in the justice process. Which issues might arise in court that could necessitate intervention by a judicial employee? Who is responsible for managing such issues in court or stepping in to handle them? How are judges, attorneys, and other judicial professionals held accountable for their conduct and decisions? What positive changes could be made to the court process? (See the Arizona Code of Judicial Administration for an example code of conduct for judicial employees and the state of Michigan’s Sentencing Guidelines Manual for an example of a guide used by judicial employees to adhere to the law.)