Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence-Based Practice

There are three main types of research: quantitative studies, qualitative studies, and mixed-methods studies. The goal of mixed methods research is to broaden and deepen our understanding of a topic by using techniques from both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. Methods that combine some of each research are defined as research in which the researcher uses both qualitative and quantitative methodologies and methods in a single study or program of inquiry to gather and analyze data, integrate the findings, and draw implications (Doorenbos, 2018). The early 1960s saw the start of mixed-methods research among anthropologists and sociologists. Although there are a plethora of designs from which to choose when conducting mixed-methods research, the four most common are the triangulation design, the embedding design, the explanatory design, and the exploratory design. Triangulation design is still the most popular and well-known strategy used in mixed methods research.

Utilizing a variety of strategies has several advantages. The identification of representative patients or outlier cases by quantitative data can help qualitative research components by providing support, whereas the construction of the conceptual model or instrument by qualitative data can provide insight into quantitative research components. Quantitative data collected at the time of data collection can help researchers choose which patients to interview, while qualitative data can shed light on the challenges and opportunities associated with patient recruitment and retention (Doorenbos, 2018). The interpretation, clarification, description, and validation of quantitative results can all be aided by qualitative data collected during data analysis. According to reports, mixed methods research is particularly advantageous in four different types of study circumstances. When a notion is new and poorly understood, the first scenario occurs. As a result, qualitative research must be conducted before applying quantitative techniques. The second instance is when additional data from a different source can help clarify results from one method. A third scenario occurs when traditional methods of analysis, either qualitative or quantitative, are unable to grasp the idea under investigation fully.

The American healthcare system has particular difficulties due to chronic pain, such as rising expenses, unintended poisonings and deaths from painkiller overdoses, and immeasurable misery for patients and their families (Doorenbos, 2018). The relatively small proportion of American Indian patients in any given region or tribe, the limitations of particular databases, and pervasive racial misclassification are all obstacles to effective research into chronic pain care among American Indians. Understanding the complicated experience, epidemiology, and management of chronic pain among American Indians requires a mixed-methods research approach that can address the strengths and drawbacks of quantitative approaches while also incorporating insights from qualitative methodologies.

Reference

Doorenbos, A. Z. (2018). Mixed Methods in Nursing Research: An Overview and Practical Examples. Kango Kenkyu. The Japanese Journal of Nursing Research, 47(3), 207–217. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4287271/

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Discuss the differences and similarities between quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research studies.  (2 hrs.)

Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence-Based Practice

Please include 400 words in your initial post and two scholarly references by Wednesday at 23:59 p.m. Please include 200 words in two answers to your peers by Saturday 23:59. Please refer to the discussion rubric.