Addressing Mental Health Access- Navigating Challenges and Enhancing Care in Our Organization

Addressing Mental Health Access- Navigating Challenges and Enhancing Care in Our Organization

The National Healthcare Crisis and Its Implications for the Organization

A problem has emerged in healthcare facilities in the United States, affecting the health of many people. This is because the number of people covered by various healthcare insurance programs has increased. The process is primarily felt because nurses cannot handle increased patient numbers in healthcare settings (Blouin & Podjasek 2019). Despite significant increases in financial investment, healthcare providers cannot meet all of their patient’s healthcare service needs. This case is well-known in the United States for increasing the elderly population.

Do you need an original copy of “Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue”? Reach us.

Blouin and Podjasek (2019) asserted that older people disproportionately affected by the problem are eligible for health insurance programs. This is a critical national healthcare issue that has permeated most healthcare facilities and affects the majority of health organizations. Nurses must work extra hard to ensure that all patients receive care in healthcare settings. This is dangerous because the number of patients with various conditions rapidly increases. Furthermore, most nurses leave their careers for a variety of reasons, resulting in a reduction in healthcare providers.

Furthermore, nurse staffing is a critical healthcare issue in healthcare facilities. However, the healthcare issue significantly impacts patient outcomes, including care quality. Most healthcare professionals and analysts have highlighted the effects of the healthcare issue. Most claim that low nurse staffing levels result in missed patient care. Poor patient outcomes, increased medication errors, high rates of hospital infections, equipment injuries, and documentation errors are among the adverse outcomes identified by Griffiths et al. (2018).

Griffiths et al. (2018) also claimed that low nursing staffing levels result in high burnout, primarily among nurses, and low job satisfaction. Furthermore, patients in understaffed facilities face increased postoperative complications, ty, and more incredible falls (MacPhee et al., 2017). As a result, nurse staffing as a healthcare issue involves insufficient nurses, which has several negative consequences.

Patients’ increased numbers have resulted in significant changes, primarily a strain on nurses in various organizations, due to nurse staffing. This is primarily due to increased floating frequency in multiple units (Chen et al., 2019). However, managing the increased number of patients using short-term methods such as floating will not be appropriate. This demonstrates that an influential requirement is required to achieve a more appropriate solution. In one facility, data collected the previous year revealed a significant increase in missed nursing care numbers (Haddad et al., 2020). This data indicated a risk to patients’ overall well-being.

A Synopsis of the Two Articles Concerning Nurse Staffing

This section uses various articles to demonstrate the size of nurse stuffing. The first article in this summary highlighted an analysis conducted by Cho et al. (2016). The article is essential because it focuses on improving the relationship between critical factors. Workplace environment, nurse staffing, and patient outcomes are a few examples. These identified article aspects were linked to factors that significantly impact nursing staff job satisfaction. According to the authors, poor working conditions and insufficient nurse staffing lead to adverse outcomes. Some of them are missed care, compromised patient safety, and increased cases of incorrect medication.

Griffiths et al., 2018 conducted the second article chosen by this summary. The study was critical because it discovered a critical link between poor patient outcomes and nurse staffing. Patient falls and increased mortality in in-patient facilities are two adverse patient outcomes. The authors suggested that missed care could be critical in determining nursing staffing adequacy. This is because it can provide an effective method of measuring the effects of insufficient nurse staffing. According to the article, low nurse staffing levels significantly contribute to missed care and high cases. This is critical because it primarily results in poor patient outcomes.

It is reasonable to conclude that there are critical approaches that can be used to manage nurse staffing in various healthcare organizations. One of the methods is ensuring as little turnover as possible within healthcare facility organizations. Because of the increased number of patients requiring various services, it is necessary to analyze which nurses are available (MacPhee et al., 2017). This aspect suggests that most nurses are willing to work for various organizations worldwide to provide better working conditions for all patients. The process is critical because it is where organizational leadership enters the picture. According to analysis, working conditions for nurses with good leadership are likely to be ideal.

Effective leadership results in lower nurse turnover and higher job satisfaction. Creating formal staffing is also essential for dealing with nurse staffing issues (Boamah et al., 2017). After an influential confrontation with the nursing staff in an organization, the process should be implemented. In an ever-changing environment, a rigid nurse staffing framework in many healthcare organizations is not ideal. According to the article, this process indicates that a more flexible nurse staffing plan is needed to assist organizations in dealing with uneven patient-nurse ratios (Boamah et al., 2017). As a result, multiple healthcare facility organizations must implement a flexible staffing plan.

Strategies for Dealing with the Organizational Impact of Nurse Staffing

The scholarly resources listed above suggest various strategies for dealing with low nurse staffing ratios. Cho et al. (2016) propose increasing nurse staffing is the primary strategy. This strategy works because increased nurse staffing leads to higher patient satisfaction and better patient outcomes. Inadequate staffing, on the other hand, drives nurses away from the process and endangers patients. Most nurses also believe that having many nurses on staff improves care delivery and reduces the likelihood of adverse events.

Similarly, increasing nurse staffing is likely to benefit various healthcare organizations. This suggests that nurses with burnout are more likely to work more efficiently, resulting in positive outcomes. According to Griffiths et al. (2018), the negative impact of increasing nurse staffing is that the organization will most likely be required to implement various aspects. Increasing labour expenditure is one of these aspects. This can be a problem for the organization because it may not have enough resources to hire more nurses (Griffiths et al., 2018). The federal government in the United States has implemented a critical process to increase nurse staffing. This is because the American Nurses Association is behind the process and has given them the authority to create staffing plans.

It is also critical to use missed care as a critical indicator. Missed care as a strategy can result in fundamental policy changes, most notably in nurse staffing ratios. Griffiths et al. (2018) state that missed care is a more realistic measurement unit. This procedure may be adequate for determining nurse staffing ratio adequacy. This approach is positive because the organization must adjust its staffing. As a result, as a serious healthcare issue, nurse staffing must be addressed by a national organization.

Similar Post: Project Evaluation and Control

References

Blouin, A. S., & Podjasek, K. (2019). The continuing saga of nurse staffing: Historical and emerging challenges. The Journal of Nursing Administration| JONA, 49(4), 221-227.

Boamah, S. A., Laschinger, H. K. S., Wong, C., & Clarke, S. (2018). Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. Nursing Outlook, 66(2), 180- 189.

Chen, Y. C., Guo, Y. L. L., Chin, W. S., Cheng, N. Y., Ho, J. J., & Shiao, J. S. C. (2019). Patient– Nurse Ratio is Related to Nurses’ Intention to Leave Their Job through Mediating Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction Factors. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(23), 4801.

Cho, E., Chin, D. L., Kim, S., & Hong, O. (2016). The relationships of nurse staffing level and work environment with patient adverse events. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(1), 74-82.

Griffiths, P., Recio‐Saucedo, A., Dall’Ora, C., Briggs, J., Mariotti, A., Meredith, P., … & Missed Care Study Group. (2018). The association between nurse staffing and omissions in nursing care: a systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(7), 1474-1487.

Haddad, L. M., Annamaraju, P., & Toney-Butler, T. J. (2020). Nursing shortage. StatPearls [Internet].

MacPhee, M., Dahinten, V. S., & Havaei, F. (2017). The impact of heavy perceived nurse workloads on patient and nurse outcomes. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 7.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for the study.

Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate organizational stakeholders).

Briefly summarize the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.