Approaches for Reducing Direct Violence During Liberia’s Civil War

Approaches for Reducing Direct Violence During Liberia’s Civil War

Reducing direct violence in the complicated aftermath of Liberia’s civil war requires a systematic approach that comprehensively tackles both immediate dangers and underlying causes. This essay discusses the suggested tactics of truth and reconciliation commissions, multinational peacekeeping missions, and disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR). Their efficacy is also examined in light of the previous strife in Liberia in this discussion.

Approaches That Could Have Reduced Direct Violence during Liberia’s Civil War

A multidimensional strategy was needed to create effective mechanisms and ways to prevent direct violence in the setting of Liberia’s civil war and post-war period. A thorough disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) program was crucial. This entails gathering and disposing of weaponry, disarming fighters, and reintegrating them into society. The possibility of resurgent violence would be reduced by disarming former combatants and aiding their transition back into civilian life through job training and social support.

Second, investing in structures for reconciliation and conflict resolution could have been useful. The creation of truth and reconciliation commissions can aid in resolving disputes, encouraging healing, and fostering understanding amongst various racial and social groups (Holden, 2023). These commissions can provide a forum for people to talk about their experiences, hold offenders responsible, and promote national harmony.

Thirdly, foreign peacekeeping missions may have played a more significant role in stopping the violence’s reappearance. A stabilizing force might have been brought about by deploying a strong and well-equipped United Nations peacekeeping force responsible for defending civilians and upholding peace agreements. A more favorable atmosphere for lowering direct violence and establishing long-lasting peace in Liberia may have been established by cooperative international efforts combined with an emphasis on bolstering local government and security institutions.

How and Why the Approaches Could Have Reduced Direct Violence during Liberia’s Civil War

The implementation of a thorough disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) program would have been necessary for an effective reduction of direct violence throughout Liberia’s civil war and the post-war era. A model for Liberia can be found in the UN-led DDR operations in Sierra Leone, which successfully disarmed combatants and assisted their reintegration into society after the country’s civil conflict. Furthermore, funding truth and reconciliation commissions like those in South Africa during the post-apartheid era would have addressed long-standing issues and aided in the mending of the country. Finally, taking a cue from well-performing UN peacekeeping operations like East Timor, a strong force mandated to defend civilians may have offered security and discouraged more bloodshed.

The Most Successful Strategy

The most promising of the three approaches put forth to lessen direct violence during Liberia’s civil war and the post-war era is a comprehensive disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) program. The accomplishment of comparable programs in Sierra Leone, where the UN was instrumental in disarming fighters and assisting their reintegration into society, indicates this and helps establish enduring peace. By taking weapons out of circulation and reintegrating former combatants into society, the DDR strategy addresses the immediate threat of violence and its underlying roots (Thill, 2021). Although foreign peacekeeping deployments and truth and reconciliation commissions are necessary, the real-world results of DDR initiatives in Sierra Leone show how successful they are at ending the cycle of violence and promoting long-term stability.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a comprehensive disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) program emerges as the most promising strategy for reducing direct violence in Liberia, even though truth and reconciliation commissions and international peacekeeping missions play crucial roles in post-conflict scenarios. The accomplishment of such programs in Sierra Leone highlights the usefulness of DDR in disarming fighters, reintegrating them into society, and promoting enduring peace, offering an essential lesson for resolving conflicts in Liberia’s turbulent past.

References

Holden, L. (2023). Cultural Expertise, Law, and Rights: A Comprehensive Guide. Taylor & Francis.

Thill, M. (2021). In Search of a Winning Formula: Lessons on DDR and Community Reintegration in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Social Science Research Council). https://ssrc-cdn1.s3.amazonaws.com/crmuploads/new_publication_3/in-search-of-a-winning-formula-lessons-on-ddr-and-community-reintegration-in-the-democratic-republic-of-the-

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

As you saw in the Discussion, strategic nonviolence can be successful in addressing a conflict. It occurs in the escalation phase of a conflict when disputants are working to increase awareness of a situation and gain support for their cause. Not all nonviolent strategies are successful or appropriate for all conflicts. When violence erupts in a conflict, it is necessary to implement systems to reduce it. When violence results in killing or harming people, it is considered direct violence. Direct violence can be contrasted with structural violence when people are deprived of their human rights and needs. Structural violence often results in direct violence, the reduction of which can be the beginning of building peace. Your text addresses several systems and approaches for reducing direct violence, such as law enforcement, humanitarian assistance, and military intervention.

Approaches for Reducing Direct Violence During Liberia’s Civil War

There is no shortage of examples of direct violence throughout history and all over the world. One example is Liberia, a country with a history of civil war. Although the most recent war ended in 2003, sporadic outbreaks of direct violence have continued. Your Learning Resources provide information about the conflict after the war.

To prepare for this assignment:

Review Chapter 8 in your course text, The Little Book of Strategic Peacebuilding. Pay particular attention to systems and approaches for reducing direct violence.
Review the article, “Liberia: Violence, Discrimination, and Impunity,” and note examples of direct violence.
Review the articles, “Violence in Liberia Extends to Journalists” and “Sex and Bribery for Better Grades: Academic Dishonesty in Liberia.” Focus on systems and approaches used to reduce violence in Liberia.
Think about three systems or approaches for reducing direct violence that could reduce direct violence in Liberia.
Consider which systems or approaches might be the most successful and why.
The assignment: (2–4 pages)

Describe three systems or approaches for reducing direct violence that could have reduced direct violence during Liberia’s civil war and/or post-war.
Explain how and why, using specific examples to illustrate your explanation.
Evaluate which strategy might be the most successful of the three, and justify your response. Be specific and use examples from the actual war(s).