Defining Humanity- Neanderthals, Denisovans, and the Human Species

Defining Humanity- Neanderthals, Denisovans, and the Human Species

Homo Sapiens Living 100,000 Years Ago had Identical Brains to ours, but did they Think like us

About 100,000 years ago, closely related hominid species like Neanderthals and Denisovans coexisted on Earth with our immediate ancestors, the Homo sapiens. It is hard to determine for sure whether their cognitive processes and thought patterns were the same as ours, despite the fact that their brains anatomically matched those of modern humans. Although the physiological design of these early humans’ brains was the same, their cultural and environmental circumstances were vastly different from our own.

It is believed that Homo sapiens’ social structures, linguistic evolution, and cultural practices shaped their cognitive capacities. These early people may have produced sophisticated tools, expressed themselves artistically, and engaged in symbolic thinking, according to the archaeological record. Scholarly disagreement exists about how much their cognitive processes resemble those of contemporary humans. It is challenging to determine whether they had the same capacity for abstract thought, self-awareness, or sophisticated symbolic communication as modern Homo sapiens due to a variety of factors, including the lack of written records and our incomplete knowledge of their social dynamics.

Furthermore, cultural features, behaviors, and even genetic material may have been blended during contact between Neanderthals, Denisovans, and Homo sapiens. There may have been some intermarriage between Neanderthals, Denisovans, and Homo sapiens tribes, according to recent DNA research, indicating some degree of cognitive and social similarity (Bates et al., 2023). However, it is theoretical to say that Homo sapiens from 100,000 years ago thought in the same manner as we do now because we do not have direct insight into the minds and consciousness of our ancestors. It is difficult to get firm conclusions on the complexity of human cognition, which highlights the significance of ongoing research in the fields of anthropology, genetics, and archaeology in order to solve the puzzles surrounding our common evolutionary past.

References

Bates, D., Tucker, J., & Lozny, L. (2023). Human Adaptive Strategies: An Ecological Introduction to Anthropology. Taylor & Francis.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

To receive credit for the discussion board, you must post a formal response of about 150-250 words (I’m not strict with the word recommendation) and you must also reply to TWO of your classmate’s responses. Your replies need to be substantial, not “I agree,” “I disagree,” or similar.

Defining Humanity- Neanderthals, Denisovans, and the Human Species

In our first lecture and reading, we saw how early humans (Homo Sapiens) diverged from and interacted with other closely related hominin species like Neanderthals and Denisovans. I would like you to address one (or more) of the following questions for your first journal entry:

a. Should Neanderthals and Denisovans be considered human? Why or why not?

b. We may have caused the extinction of Neanderthals and Denisovans. What does this say about our “human nature?”

c. Homo Sapiens living 100,000 years ago had identical brains to ours, but did they think like us? Why or why not?