Social justice- Discrimination and bullying at school

Social justice- Discrimination and bullying at school

The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) community experiences intense discrimination in various quarters. In the school setting, learners who identify as LGBTQ+ tend to encounter discrimination and unfair treatment from peers and the administration. The lack of clear policies that compel the administration to treat all students fairly without considering their gender orientation exacerbates this situation. As an institution of socialization, the discriminative tendencies place undue pressure and anxiety on the students. Besides discrimination, these students also encounter increased bullying and exclusion from social activities (Earnshaw, Reisner, & Juvonen, 2017). In institutions that have policies, enforcement is a significant issue. The lack of protection of these students hinders equal access to academic as well as extracurricular activities. States such as Alabama, Arizona, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana have policies that prohibit the administration from discussing LGBTQ+ issues (Human Rights Watch, 2016). To remedy this situation, a new non-profit organization whose key role will be to conduct sensitization campaigns in institutions of learning will be created.

Our assignment writing help is at affordable prices to students of all academic levels and academic disciplines.

Learning Gender LLC.

Learning Gender LLC. is a non-profit entity that will be created for the sole purpose of sensitizing the community about the LGBTQ+ community. The main platforms that the organization will use is schools. The non-profit entity will offer equal employment opportunities to individuals from varied gender orientations as one of its core values. Since its mandate is to fight the discrimination of learners in the LGBTQ+ community, it will embody equality for all genders.

Learning Gender LLC. will be based in Arizona, which is one of the states that restrict discussions about LGBTQ+ issues in the school environment. The entity will have representative branches in each of the other states that have similar policies. These include Alabama, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. The reason for basing operations in these states is to kick off the sensitization campaigns from areas that are more skeptical about the LGBTQ+ community and their rights as American citizens (Human Rights Watch, 2016).

The entity will utilize the main strategy for sensitization by holding seminars, talks, and workshops in schools. These seminars will include students and teachers, while others will include the administration and parents separately. The main goal is to share knowledge and information about LGBTQ+ among learners and the administration ass well as parents. In addition, the campaigns will enlighten the administration and other students about the effects that their discriminative and insensitive acts have on LGBTQ+ learners. The provision of statistics regarding discrimination is important for fact-based information. Most importantly, volunteering LGBTQ+ learners will be allowed to speak during the seminars and workshops and share their opinions, feelings, challenges, struggles, and desires in relation to discrimination in the learning institutions.

This plan employs advocacy on behalf of LGBTQ+ youngsters in American learning institutions. As an entity that understands the current statistics as well as potential future effects, the minority group needs representation. The entity will be the voice for the entire group in various locations. Minimal literature demonstrates the effectiveness of sensitization programs, especially in the LGBTQ+ case. However, this does not rule out any chances of success in using the strategy to increase equality and inclusivity in the school setting. It provides an opportunity to ascertain the role that information from reliable sources plays in promoting equality.

Critique

The highlighted plan’s strengths include a high chance of effectiveness because of the number of people that the chosen platform can reach. Using schools as a platform to create awareness about the events and effects of discrimination and bullying against LGBTQ+ provides a large multitude. This cuts back the cost of finding the crowds through marketing. The only requirement is to approach the school administration and seek an opportunity to speak to the stakeholders. Furthermore, the same platforms provide a direct connection to the actual environment and stakeholders that perpetrate the discrimination acts. This allows direct communication and eliminates any communication challenges that are associated with indirect communication. In addition, it is possible to collect feedback about the other learners’ perspectives on the LGBTQ+ community and create targeted content from this information. Finally, it is possible to create continuous partnerships with these institutions and create a safe space for all learners and staff members to ask questions or express their concerns. This gives the project continuity and makes it sustainable.

The initiative’s weaknesses include the likelihood of failure due to a lack of evidence that confirms the past effectiveness of the approach. The issues of LGBTQ+ are widespread. However, the community is gaining momentum, and being open and transparent is one of the strategies employed by many. Despite the need for this transparency, the entity’s management is uncertain about the reception in the institutions of learning especially among teachers who come from different generations. The process is like introducing change in an organization. The resistance that will be put up may affect the learners negatively and cancel out all the benefits they stand to gain from the prices. In addition, the need to involve different professionals in the process extends the magnitude of the exercise. These human resources include education coordinators, lawyers, pediatricians, counselors, and other healthcare professionals (Earnshaw, Reisner, & Juvonen, 2017).

Try on a New Lens

As an empowerment program, the initiative would consider discrimination at the workplace (Hentze & Tyus, 2021). Instead of speaking on behalf of the minority group, it would seek to grow their talent as well as impart skills and knowledge. The members of the minority group would access funding to start their own ventures. This would enable economic empowerment and help in lowering the levels of poverty.

The main strategies would include offering partial or full scholarships to the group’s members. These scholarships would enhance skill and knowledge acquisition. Partnerships with certain learning institutions would be necessary in such a case. Secondly, the group’s members would have a chance to undergo training from established businesspeople. This form of mentoring would provide practical knowledge about the real-world situation in relation to business. As such, the entity would need to rally more sponsors for the activities that they need to undertake. Access to more financial resources would be critical to the success of this initiative.

Conclusion

The LGBTQ+ community experiences intense discrimination. Young learners in schools are bullied and denied equal opportunities for academic and non-academic activities. This creates a lack of equity in the learning environment. The Learning Gender initiative is expected to create awareness among learners and teachers about these issues. The strategy lacks reliable evidence of success in the past. However, information, or the lack of it, is a critical factor in decision-making. This risk, which is an act of advocacy, may turn out as expected or better than the set expectations. Implementation is the only way to ascertain this.

References

Earnshaw, V. A., Reisner, S. L., & Juvonen, J. (2017). LGBTQ Bullying: Translating Research to Action in Pediatrics. Pediatrics, 140(4). doi:10.1542/peds.2017-0432

Hentze, I., & Tyus, R. (2021). Sex and Gender Discrimination in the Workplace. Retrieved from National Conference of State Legislatures: https://www.ncsl.org/research/labor-and-employment/-gender-and-sex-

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Human Rights Watch. (2016). Discrimination Against LGBT Youth in US Schools.

Develop a hypothetical plan for addressing a social injustice that you have identified related to your population, the LGBTQ+ community. The plan could entail the creation of a new nonprofit organization, public policy reform, a community organizing campaign, an activist movement, or something else, a writer’s choice

Social justice- Discrimination and bullying at school

Your paper should have a maximum of five pages and a minimum of six references. Include the following sections:
OVERVIEW AND DESCRIPTION
• Provide an overview of the plan, highlighting any specific strategies that will be employed.
• Is this a plan that employs empowerment, advocacy, or liberation?
• Provide evidence (at least four references) of the potential effectiveness of these strategies, using the social work literature, especially from our course readings, to support the discussion
CRITIQUE
• Include a critique of your plan by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the plan, making note of what resources would be necessary to ensure success.
TRY ON A NEW LENS
• Briefly describe how the intervention would be different with a different set of strategies. (Think broadly: If it’s empowerment, how would it look different as an advocacy-based plan?)
• Use references to back up your claims about a different set of strategies (at least two references).