Appropriate Intervention – Blaze Mining Case Study

Appropriate Intervention – Blaze Mining Case Study

Introduction

Every organization experiences challenges that create a need for change and development. However, effective change can only be achieved if all employees and leaders in the organization are engaged in the change process. Therefore, it is important to select various intervention programs that can aid employees and leaders in adapting to changes that facilitate organizational development. There are various intervention programs that can be used, but their appropriateness dictates their success to the challenge in the organization, the availability of resources in the organization, and the time required to implement the actions.

Appropriate Intervention for The Case Study

The appropriate intervention for the Blaze Mining Company is workshops. According to Armstrong & Landers (2018), workshops are learning and teaching arrangements usually organized in small groups structured to promote active participation in learning. They provide participants with the opportunity to practice various skills and receive feedback. The main types of workshops held by organizations are company culture workshops, new employee onboarding workshops, work-life balance workshops, financial tools workshops, workplace equality and diversity in the workplace workshops, and employee development workshops. Get in touch with us at eminencepapers.com. We offer assignment help with high professionalism.

The most appropriate type of workshop that is appropriate for Blaze Mining Company is the employee development workshop. It will be used to develop both leaders and employees in the company to enhance teamwork and promote collaborative leadership. Workshops will also be integrated with coaching to facilitate a specialized intervention with each division/department. Coaching is defined as a training or development process through which a person is supported while achieving a specific professional or personal competence goal or result (Kim, 2014). It may be applied to an informal relationship between two people where one has more expertise and experience and provides guidance and advice as the other undergoes a learning process. The coaching intervention that will be considered for the specialized intervention will be executive and business coaching. Business coaching focuses on providing advice, support, and feedback to a group or individual to improve their personal effectiveness in the business environment. It includes corporate coaching, executive coaching, and leadership coaching. Executive and corporate coaching is structured to facilitate personal and professional development to promote individual growth, contentment, and performance. Leadership coaching focuses on instilling leadership skills and attributes to improve leadership.

The Intervention Applicability to The Case Study

Workshops are applicable to the case study due to various reasons. One of the main reasons is that they promote working in groups, which is one of the things the company needs to create collaboration. Currently, leaders are not collaborating because of the antagonistic behavior among leaders. Internal teams also do not cooperate in the operation and management of critical functions within the company. Working in groups will, therefore, foster collaboration among the teams and leaders, hence improving the company’s performance. Working in groups also enhances the success of the intervention. According to Bierema (2014), an effective intervention program should be a group process to ensure that every member functions better with others. Groups also need to understand and collectively implement changes. There is also a need to ensure that all group members change their behavior appropriately to ensure that change is successfully implemented.

The current situation at Blaze Mining Company has been caused by the behavior of employees and their leaders. Workshops are, therefore, an appropriate intervention because they will help change employees’ behavior by focusing on discussions that encourage them to adopt behaviors that encourage teamwork. This will help in ensuring that the change being implemented towards collaborative leadership is effective. Bierema (2014) argues that lasting change occurs when people change their ways of doing and thinking, which is why organizational development can be significant and can also take a long time to occur. Bierema (2014) adds that change is also a process that cannot occur overnight, which is why it is important to ensure that everyone involved in the change develops a mindset that allows them to embrace the change. Workshops will also promote experimental learning, which is essential in developing behaviors and attitudes that the company intends to promote.

Organizational development favors action, which is why interventions create opportunities for employees to experience new ways of acting and thinking (Cummings & Worley, 2014). Workshops can expose employees to different scenarios that prompt them to think and act differently from how they are used to, hence influencing change (Harrison, 2012). Workshops will also create a long-term commitment to implement them, ensuring that employees participate and acquire the necessary behaviors to facilitate collaborative leadership development. Making lasting changes in an organization also requires long-term commitment and action from all levels of the organization (Bierema, 2014). Workshops are appropriate for Blaze Mining company’s case because they promote long-term commitment to teamwork and enhance collaboration between the leaders and the internal team members.

Actions Involved When Utilizing the Intervention

One of the actions involved in utilizing the intervention is eliciting the responses and reactions of the employees and leaders. This will be achieved through a buzz group and brainstorming. A buzz group includes dividing the participants into small groups and providing each group with a question to address. Brainstorming, on the other hand, includes exchanging ideas to solve a problem. Individuals in the workshop should be allowed to express their ideas without being judged so that everyone can settle on the best solution to a problem. The second action will be problem–solving. It will include reviewing structured cases or problem scenarios. The case scenario will be presented to the whole group in the workshop, and the group members will be required to discuss the problem and come up with the most effective solution. This action will be aimed at encouraging teamwork among the employees. The third action is evaluation, which will be done to determine how the attendants received the workshop and whether it yielded the predicted outcome. It will include competence measures used to determine the competencies gained from the workshop by providing questionnaires with specific questions about the workshop. It will also include outcome measures that will evaluate the behavior of the employees and leaders after the workshop.

The first action in the coaching intervention will be establishing the objective of the coaching. This will help ensure that employees understand that they are receiving executive, corporate, and leadership coaching. The second action will be assessing the coaching process by determining what the participants expect to learn, what they intend to do differently in the future, and the skills they intend to develop to effectively complete the tasks assigned to them. The third action will be identifying the coaching goals to motivate participants to complete the coaching process; the fourth action will be providing feedback based on the coaches’ observations. The feedback will be connected to the intervention’s purpose in determining whether the intended change has been achieved. The fifth action will be shared for workshops and the coaching process. It will include a wrap-up section with all stakeholders. This action will help create accountability and encourage the worship and coaching participants to reach their goals and maintain the behavior and skills developed to implement change successfully. The session will include recognizing the progress in implementing change and encouraging the leaders and employees to manage the company’s obstacles by applying what they have learned.

Conclusion

The main challenge facing Blaze Mining Company is the lack of collaboration between employees and leaders. Therefore, the most appropriate intervention program is one that encourages the leaders and employees to work together. Workshops are, therefore, an appropriate intervention because they include completing various activities as a group, hence fostering collaboration. Integrative coaching in workshops is appropriate for fostering collaboration among leaders to eliminate antagonistic behavior. However, it is crucial that the intervention program ends with a session updating all stakeholders on what has been achieved and the long-term impact of the intervention programs on the company.

References

Armstrong, M. B., & Landers, R. N. (2018). Gamification of employee training and development. International Journal of Training and Development, 22(2), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12124

Bierema, L. L. (2014). Organization development: An action research approach.

Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization development and change. Cengage Learning.

Harrison, R. (2012). Employee development. Universities Press.

Kim, S. (2014). Assessing the influence of managerial coaching on employee outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21175

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Appropriate Intervention – Blaze Mining Case Study

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review Chapters 7, 8, and 9 of the course textbook and read the following articles: What We Can Learn from Evaluating OD Interventions, The Benefits of Creating A

Diverse Workforce     (https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2019/09/09/the-benefits-of-creating- a-diverse-workforce/#36e8cacb140b), and What Are the Advantages of a Diverse Workforce? (https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-diverse-workforce-18780.html) Watch the video, How Can You Influence Others?

Last week, you prepared the foundation of your final project by selecting a case study and applying the appropriate action research process to the OD challenge. Based on your knowledge of intervention types, you proposed a recommended interaction for the challenge. This week, you will have the opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of individual, team, group, and organizational interventions and what they look like during problem-solving and decision-making.

Intervention is the “doing” phase of action research. This paper will solidify your intervention selection. You will explain the actions used during your selected intervention and comprehensively apply the process to the case study. The paper must be at least two full pages in length and must include the course textbook as a reference, as well as three additional scholarly and credible sources to support the content of the paper.

In your paper,

Select an appropriate intervention for your case study.

Evaluate why the intervention is applicable to the case study. Interpret the actions involved when utilizing the intervention.