Hematology Lab Reporting Worksheet
In science, reporting what has been done in a laboratory setting is incredibly important for communicating, replicating, and validating findings. However, writing scientific reports can be a little overwhelming. There is a set of agreed-upon components that the scientific community requires when reporting scientific experimentation. Answer the following questions to describe what occurred during the lab you conducted in Labster. Be sure to use complete sentences and descriptions that fully represent what you experienced. Writing a lab report is less about being correct or incorrect than it is about accurately reporting what happened and why. So, do not worry about reporting data that might seem counterintuitive or unexpected. Focus on clearly communicating what you did and what you observed. Do you need help with your assignment ? Contact us at eminencepapers.com.
TITLE:
What was the title of the lab you completed?
Morphology of Blood Cells: Exploring Staining Techniques
PROBLEM:
What was the problem you were trying to resolve in the Lab?
The problem addressed in the lab was to study and understand the morphology of blood cells using staining techniques.
HYPOTHESIS:
What information from the textbook and classroom is relevant for the problem you were trying to resolve in the lab? Identify the concepts and explain how they are related to the lab problem.
Based on the facts from the textbook and the classroom, it was anticipated that platelets are involved in blood clotting, white blood cells are essential for the immune system’s fight against infections, and red blood cells are principally responsible for oxygen transportation.
During the lab, what information from the THEORY section provided additional background information about the problem? (To review the theory section, launch the lab and click the “Theory” tab at the top of the data pad). Identify the concepts and explain how they are related to the lab problem.
The theory segment included extra background knowledge about the roles and traits of various blood cells during the lab. Hemoglobin in red blood cells (erythrocytes) binds and distributes oxygen.
Most scientific experimentation involves examining variables and their relationships. A variable is a construct that can be changed and studied. Examples of variables are a condition or measurable quantity. What are the variables you examined in the lab? Which one were you controlling and changing? Which one were you observing was impacted by your change?
Leukocytes—white blood cells—are immune system cells that include neutrophils and lymphocytes. Infection defense requires leukocytes. The lab evaluated red, white, and platelet blood cells. The kind of blood cell under observation functioned as the controlled and altered variable, and the function and traits of each blood cell type were the observed variables.
Developing a hypothesis requires understanding relevant background knowledge. Now that you have described relevant background information, it is time to develop a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a simple statement (not a question), grounded in previous research, that predicts the relationship between the variables being studied. Please make a statement that predicts the relationship between the variables being studied.
According to the hypothesis, platelets are in charge of blood clotting, white blood cells are involved in the immune system’s defense against infections, and red blood cells largely carry oxygen throughout the body.
METHOD:
Describing what you did during a lab helps other scientists to replicate your work. It is through this consistent replication that scientists are able to see repeating patterns and develop ideas that help move science forward. When you discuss your data, in a later section, you will have to describe what choices you made, why you made them, and any concerns about things that occurred that were unexpected. In order to have enough information to do this, you need to keep very detailed notes. What doesn’t seem important at the moment may end up being something that explains your findings later. A benefit of conducting virtual labs when learning science is that many potential errors are controlled for you. The virtual lab environment often will alert you if something is not going the way it should. This does not occur in non-virtual settings. For this reason, the virtual lab setting can be very helpful to learners. However, we still have to practice documenting so that those skills are practiced for the lab experiences when technology will not be there as a coach.
You have already identified the variables that you studied in the lab in the previous section. Now, take some time to fully define and describe what each variable is and how it was changed throughout the lab.
White blood cells, or leukocytes, are immune system components that comprise lymphocytes and neutrophils. Leukocytes are necessary for infection resistance. Red, white, and platelet blood cells were examined in the lab. The function and characteristics of each type of blood cell were the observed variables, while the type of blood cell under observation served as the controlled and changing variable.
In 3-5 sentences summarize what you did during the lab not including your process of logging into the system. This section would be much more robust for a non-virtual lab. For this virtual lab, a short, high-level summary will suffice.
Blood samples were taken throughout the lab and prepared for Giemsa staining, which allowed for the visualization and discrimination of different blood cell types. Peripheral blood smears were then created on glass slides, followed by a microscopic examination. This examination allowed us to observe the morphology of the blood cells and identify their unique characteristics. The Giemsa staining technique was crucial in enhancing the visibility and distinguishing features of the different types of blood cells, facilitating a comprehensive analysis and understanding of their composition and functions.
Describe some of the observations you made. What numbers did you write down or keep track of? What did each of your senses observe during the lab process? What did you see (ex, changes in colors, movement, shapes, sizes, patterns)? What did you hear (ex, sounds from reactions, collisions, error messages)? What did your lab character touch? Did you notice anything that seemed unexpected? Did you notice anything that you did not expect to observe?
In the experiment, researchers used a microscope to record blood cell morphology, including colors, sizes, forms, and patterns. Erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet traits were revealed. Leukocytes included neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils, whereas erythrocytes were biconcave. The platelets were seen to be tiny and atypically shaped. Given the well-documented staining techniques and knowledge about blood cell morphology, the observers did not anticipate any unexpected observations during the experiment.
Which parts of the lab required you to think more than others and required more time? Which parts were simple and completed easily?
The interpretation and analysis of the microscopic images required more thinking and time compared to other parts of the lab. Identifying and differentiating the various blood cell types based on their morphology involved careful observation and reference to the provided materials. The staining process itself was relatively simple and completed easily, as the Labster environment guided us through the necessary steps.
DATA & RESULTS:
Many lessons learned as a result of scientific experiments come from the reporting and analysis of data. This part of scientific reporting requires detailed descriptions of technical information and quantities as well as high-level synthesis of information. High-level synthesis requires a mastery of foundational content in the related scientific field and a complimentary mastery in some fields of quantitative and/or qualitative analysis. For this report, let’s focus on big-picture patterns.
What relationships did you notice between the variables you examined? When you changed the variable(s), how did the other(s) change?
The relationship between the variables examined was that the blood cells became visible and distinguishable under the microscope by applying the staining technique. When we changed the staining technique, the morphology of the blood cells became clearer, allowing for more accurate identification and analysis.
Did you notice any patterns in your data? Any patterns between the variables?
We observed patterns in our data, such as the consistent appearance of biconcave erythrocytes, the varying sizes and shapes of leukocytes, and the small, irregularly shaped platelets. These patterns helped us identify and differentiate the different blood cell types.
DISCUSSION:
The discussion section is used to explain why things might have happened the way that they did in your experiment. Here, scientists describe any potential anomalies or mistakes and why they think they may have occurred.
During your lab, what happened that might have impacted the accuracy of your data? Did the simulation alert you that an error was occurring? If so, how did you resolve it?
During the lab, there were no specific factors that impacted the accuracy of our data. The Labster simulation provided a controlled environment, and any potential errors were minimized. The simulation also informed us of any problems, allowing us to take immediate corrective action.
CONCLUSION:
The conclusion section of a lab report describes how the learnings from the lab experimentation fit in to prior scientific knowledge. This is done by comparing new information to previously known information that was identified in the section of your report that discusses background information.
Review the hypothesis section of your report from above and describe how the results of your lab compare to the background information that you discussed before.
The test results showed that red blood cells deliver oxygen, white blood cells fight germs, and platelets clot blood.
Once scientists have identified how the new knowledge fits into the old knowledge, they discuss the implications of the new information for moving forward. In this class, the purpose of the study is to learn some foundational science ideas represented by the course student learning outcomes. Review the course student learning outcome aligned with this lab in the assignment directions on Blackboard. How is the information from this lab related to the course student learning outcome? What knowledge has the lab supported you with learning that is related to this course’s student learning outcome?
The lab identified several blood cell types and their functions. The information from this lab is related to the course student learning outcome, which is to understand the functions and characteristics of blood cells and their role in the immune system and overall human health.
Following scientific experimentation, scientists usually come up with new questions that result from what they learned. These new questions often end up leading to new experiments in the future. What additional scientific things do you wonder about after completing and writing about your lab experience?
What is the extent of intercellular interactions between different blood cell types during the body’s immune response to an infection?
How do these interactions contribute to the overall immune defense mechanism?
How does the composition and functionality of blood cells change in the presence of various diseases, and what insights can be gained from studying these alterations in order to develop effective diagnostic or therapeutic strategies?
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question
The final step for this assessment is to complete the lab report. As you work through the lab, compile the pieces of your report. To make the experience more interesting, complete the Hypothesis section prior to diving into the lab.
When you are satisfied with your work in the lab, please complete and submit your lab report.