Evaluating a Source- A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Community Policing on Crime Reduction
The article, A Meta-analysis of the Impact of community policing on Crime Reduction by Niyazi, Huseyin Akdogan, Robert Kelly, and Sebahattin Gultekin provides information on the role of community policing in reducing the crime rate. I found the source in Google Scholar using the keywords community policing and crime prevention. The article was originally published in the Community Safety and Well-Being Journal in 2022 by SG Publishing Inc. as an official publication of the Community Safety Knowledge Alliance. The source is credible and useful for my research because it has been written by individuals with experience in the topic and provides arguments supporting my argument that community policing helps maintain order in society and increases community confidence in the police leading to a reduced crime rate. Do you need urgent assignment help ? Reach out to us. We endeavor to assist you the best way possible.
The article is reliable because the information presented by the authors is supported by findings from past research studies focusing on similar concepts. The authors’ credentials indicate that they have experience in criminology and research, thus indicating that the article is reliable. For example, Niyazi Ekici has a bachelor’s degree in security studies, a master’s in political history, and a master’s and a Ph.D. in criminal justice. He also has experience teaching research methods, statistics, terrorism, criminology theory, policing, and private security courses at undergraduate and graduate levels. Huseyin Akdogan has a masters in criminal justice and experience in crime-related research. Robert Kelly works at the Department of Law Enforcement and Justice Administration at Western Illinois University. He is also a retired lieutenant with ten years of experience drafting law enforcement policies. Lastly, Sebahattin Gultekin has conducted various research studies on criminal justice and policymaking. He is also a professor in Odessa College’s sociology department. The article is authentic because the authors’ conclusions are also based on a study conducted in communities that use community policing, thus providing evidence of the efficiency of community policing in crime reduction. The authors’ own sources include the findings from their meta-analysis.
The article aims to determine the relationship between community policing and crime rate. The authors arrive at their conclusion by combining two past meta-analyses of community policing and English and Turkish online searches. They conclude that community policing reduces drug sales, property crime and disorders, but it is not effective in reducing crimes such as gun use, burglary, and robbery. The authors use graphs and tables to present their research findings, making it easier for readers to understand them. The article is of value to my research because it will offer information I can use to support my arguments on the role of the community and police officers in community policing and the influence of community policing in reducing the crime rate.
Generally, the article is both credible and useful for my research because it contains information that I can use to support my arguments and has been written by individuals with experience in the topic I will be addressing in my research. I will mainly focus on the information provided by the authors about the role of communities and police officers in community policing and the influence of community policing on crime reduction and prevention.
References
Ekici, N., Akdogan, H., Kelly, R., & Gultekin, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of community policing on crime reduction. Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being, 7(3), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.35502/
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question
WORKPLACE WRITINF 11
2.1
Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a Source
ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources you have found about your research topic in your preliminary research. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. Once you have chosen a source, you will evaluate the source on two levels:
Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability.
Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level.
Sample Touchstone 2.1
Evaluating a Source- A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Community Policing on Crime Reduction
In order to foster learning and growth, all essays you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any recycled work will be sent back with a 0, and you will be given one attempt to redo the Touchstone.
A. Assignment Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source. Provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) Recall that a thesis statement states your position and an overview of your reasons. For this assignment, include a thesis statement stating whether your source is or is not useful for your research and why.
You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
Credibility: Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness. Did the author include his or her own sources? Do you see the author’s credentials?
Usefulness: Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How does it address your research question? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)? Are there any special features in this source? For example, does it use visuals or graphs? Is it current?
Finally, you will include a conclusion that shows your final assessments on both counts.
Keep in mind: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
Source Identification
❒ Have you provided the author’s name?
❒ Have you provided the source title?
❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?
Source Evaluation
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s credibility?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on credibility?
❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness?
❒ Have you used specific examples from the source to illustrate your judgment on usefulness?
B. Reflection Questions Guidelines
DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)
Keep in mind: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
C. Rubric
Advanced (100%) Proficient (85%) Acceptable (75%) Needs Improvement (50%) Non-Performance (0%)
Thesis Statement (10 points)
Provide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support.
The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused and well-supported. The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is adequately supported. The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea that is generally supported. The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea, but it is not not well supported or does not match most of the essay’s content. The thesis statement is missing or completely unsupported.
Evidence and Analysis (20 points)
Evaluate a single source based on the characteristics of credibility and usefulness.
The analysis includes specific examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed. The analysis includes examples from the text as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are adequately developed. The analysis includes some examples from the text, though they are potentially vague or abstract; claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development. The analysis includes one or two examples from the text, but they are of a vague, abstract nature; claims for either credibility or usefulness are missing. The analysis includes little to no examples for support; there are no established claims for either credibility or usefulness.
Organization (5 points)
Exhibit competent organizational writing techniques.
Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an engaging introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement. Presents nearly all of the required components of a source evaluation essay; however, one component is missing. Presents most of the required components of a source evaluation essay but is lacking two components: sequences of ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay. Lacks several or all of the components of a source evaluation essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.
Style (5 points)
Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices.
Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures. Demonstrates generally effective style choices but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures. Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.
Conventions (5 points)
Follow conventions for standard written English.
There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage. There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.
Reflection (5points)
Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully.
Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses, following or exceeding response length guidelines. Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples, following response length guidelines. Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines. Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines. No reflection responses are present.
D. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
Use a readable 12-point font.
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Include your source information in the appropriate APA formatting (see the resources section if you need a review).
Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.