Fabricant Manufacturing Project
Fabricant Corporation is a manufacturing company that makes and distributes specialized metal parts, serving over a thousand clients. This company has grown and expanded its shareholder base. Hence, its mission has improved to more than just providing quality products but also improving shareholder value. Lee Feinberg, the CEO of the company, asked his senior management team to propose projects that will align with the company’s sustainability objectives. Janice Scott, the Head of Strategic Planning, proposed three project activities that would contribute to the company’s achievement of its sustainability goals;
- Solar panel installation
- Interior and exterior retrofit of industrial lighting throughout the facility
- Adoption of less energy-intensive welding processes in the production facilities
The following is a project management plan designed to examine the feasibility of the project and the implementation of resources and processes to help the team achieve its desired objectives.
- Project Initiation
- Feasibility Analysis
A feasibility analysis evaluates a proposed project’s practicality (Gray et al., 2008). The Fabricant Manufacturing Project has adequate economic, organizational, and technical feasibility. First, the project is feasible economically because it is expected to cause significant financial savings for the company. The solar panel investment is expected to earn the company $50,000 per year in energy savings and up to 20% return on investment within the first six years. On the other hand, the interior and exterior lighting retrofit is expected to have an 89% return on investment. Lastly, the company is expected to achieve up to 70% reduction in energy consumption with the installation of less energy-intensive welding processes.
- Project Alignment with Organization’s Strategic Goals
The CEO of Fabricant Manufacturing identified three main goals for the company; reduce energy consumption by a minimum of 20%, raise community consciousness of environmental issues and concerns, and generate a return on investment of at least 15%. The proposed project activities will help the company to achieve these objectives. Solar panel installation and changing to energy-efficient lighting and welding processes help the company to significantly reduce its energy consumption. Each project activity has estimated investment returns of at least 20%. Lastly, making these energy consumption changes will help raise community awareness on environmental issues by showing the efficacy of energy-efficient production methods.
- Project Charter
This project aims to improve energy efficiency at Fabricant Corporation to generate more stakeholder value. The following are the main objectives of the project;
- Reduce energy consumption by a minimum of 20%
- Raise community consciousness of environmental issues and concerns
- Generate a return on investment of at least 15%
The scope of the project includes; the installation of solar panels, improvement of the interior and exterior industrial lighting throughout the facility, and the adoption of energy-efficient welding processes in the company’s production facilities. The following is the project’s charter.
Project Title | Solar Panel Installation |
Date | October 2020 |
Project Purpose | To install solar panels at the company’s industrial complex |
Project Objectives | To improve energy efficiency, to generate earnings on energy savings, to create more shareholder value |
Deliverables | Comprehensive energy audit
Installation of solar panels Life cycle cost analysis |
Project Personnel | Project Manager Sam Massoni,
American Grid Program Manager Trudy Noble, Environmental Manager Paul Callahan, Distribution Logistics Manager Elwood Vaughn, Systems/IT Director Perry Silverman, Finance Analyst Jeff Salvatore, PR/Communications Manager Emmitt McAuley, OSHA liaison Matt Stevens, Strategic Planning Assistant |
Risks | Costs will exceed estimates, and ROI will be less than expected
Team members do not possess all the necessary skills to carry out necessary project activities Replacement work will disrupt production activities and delay output New technologies will fail to deliver expected energy efficiencies Removal and disposal of hazardous materials in old lighting systems |
Schedule Summary | Three months from kickoff |
Budget Summary | Project cost estimate of $310,000, with expected offsets of $245,000 |
Measurable Success Criteria | Demonstrated reduction in energy consumption, as measured in comparison to baseline audit |
Project Limitations | TBD |
Project Title | Industrial Lighting Retrofit |
Date | October 2020 |
Project Purpose | To install solar panels at the company’s industrial complex |
Project Objectives | To improve energy efficiency, to generate earnings on energy savings, to create more shareholder value. |
Deliverables | Comprehensive energy audit
Installation of solar panels Life cycle cost analysis |
Project Personnel | Project Manager Sam Massoni,
American Grid Program Manager Trudy Noble, Environmental Manager Paul Callahan, Distribution Logistics Manager Elwood Vaughn, Systems/IT Director Perry Silverman, Finance Analyst Jeff Salvatore, PR/Communications Manager Emmitt McAuley, OSHA liaison Matt Stevens, Strategic Planning Assistant |
Risks | Costs will exceed estimates, and ROI will be less than expected
Team members do not possess all the necessary skills to carry out necessary project activities Replacement work will disrupt production activities and delay output New technologies will fail to deliver expected energy efficiencies Removal and disposal of hazardous materials in old lighting systems |
Schedule Summary | Three months from kickoff |
Budget Summary | Project cost estimate of $310,000, with expected offsets of $245,000 |
Measurable Success Criteria | Demonstrated reduction in energy consumption, as measured in comparison to baseline audit |
Project Limitations | TBD |
Project Title | Development of Energy Efficient Welding Processes |
Date | October 2020 |
Project Purpose | To install solar panels at the company’s industrial complex |
Project Objectives | To improve energy efficiency, generate earnings on energy savings, and create more shareholder value. |
Deliverables | Comprehensive energy audit
Installation of solar panels Life cycle cost analysis |
Project Personnel | Project Manager Sam Massoni,
American Grid Program Manager Trudy Noble, Environmental Manager Paul Callahan, Distribution Logistics Manager Elwood Vaughn, Systems/IT Director Perry Silverman, Finance Analyst Jeff Salvatore, PR/Communications Manager Emmitt McAuley, OSHA liaison Matt Stevens, Strategic Planning Assistant |
Risks | Costs will exceed estimates, and ROI will be less than expected
Team members do not possess all the necessary skills to carry out necessary project activities Replacement work will disrupt production activities and delay output New technologies will fail to deliver expected energy efficiencies Removal and disposal of hazardous materials in old lighting systems |
Schedule Summary | Three months from kickoff |
Budget Summary | Project cost estimate of $310,000, with expected offsets of $245,000 |
Measurable Success Criteria | Demonstrated reduction in energy consumption, as measured in comparison to baseline audit |
Project Limitations | TBD |
- Project Timeline and Cost Estimate
This project is estimated to take three months from the project initiation date. The estimated project costs are $310,000, with expected offsets of $245,000.
- Stakeholders
A stakeholder analysis is an evaluation of the list of stakeholders who will be critical to the project’s implementation. This list also includes parties that will be affected by the project’s implementation (Meredith et al., 2017). Attached is a stakeholder analysis, which includes a list of the stakeholders, their roles in the project, their interests, and their classification.
References
Gray, R. M., Cook, M. B., Natera, M. T., Inglis, M. M., & Dodge, M. L. (2008). Project Management: The In Managerial Process”, McGraw-Hill.
Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., & Mantel Jr, S. J. (2017). Project Management: A Strategic Managerial Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Stakeholder Analysis Template
Name | Role | Interest | Power | Classification |
Lee Feinberg | CEO | High | High | Positive |
Janice Scott | Strategic Planning | Medium | Medium | Positive |
Sam Massoni | Program Manager | High | Medium | Positive |
Paul Callahan | Distribution Logistics | Medium | Low | Neutral |
Elwood Vaughn | IT/Systems Director | High | Low | Neutral |
Trudy Noble | Environment Manager | High | High | Neutral |
Jeff Salvatore | PR/Communications Manager | Medium | Low | Neutral |
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question
QSO 640 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview:
In the final project, you will develop a complete project plan for a hypothetical organization. Each milestone assignment will help you complete portions of the final project. In this milestone, you will analyze the Fabricant Manufacturing Project (case study available in MindEdge) and begin tasks related to initiation. You will first define the project in the project charter during the project initiation phase.
Prompt:
The goal of this milestone is to apply project management skills acquired in the first three modules to a real-world project or situation. The analysis of the Fabricant Manufacturing Project case study (in Mindedge) should include an evaluation of the selection criteria, alignment with the organization strategic goals, project charter elements, project initiation approval, and stakeholder analysis (Template).
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
- Project Initiation
- Identify the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the For instance, how is the project a viable fit within the organization?
- Explain how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic goals utilizing the traceability matrix (in Mindedge).
- Develop a project charter that includes a high-level scope of what is to be
- Create a high-level timeline and cost estimate to complete the
- Identify the concerns of the internal and external key project stakeholders.
- Compare the level of support from all key project stakeholders to inform the course of action resulting in success of the
- Complete the stakeholder analysis template.
Guidelines for Submission: Your draft of the Project Initiation portion of your final project should adhere to the following formatting requirements: 3–4 pages, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. Utilize table(s) within your document as you create the high-level timeline and cost estimate. You should use current APA-style guidelines for your citations and a reference list with a minimum of two sources.
Critical Elements | Proficient (100%) | Needs Improvement (75%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
Project Initiation: Feasibility | Identifies the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the project and how the project is a viable fit within the organization | Identifies the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the project, but does not discuss how the project is a viable fit within the organization or is inaccurate or
cursory |
Does not identify the economic, technical, and organizational feasibility of the project | 10 |
Project Initiation: Strategic Goals | Explains how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic goals | Explains how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic goals, but
explanation is inaccurate or cursory |
Does not describe how the project aligns to the organization’s strategic
goals |
15 |
Project Initiation: Project Charter | Develops a project charter that includes a high-level scope of what is to be accomplished and is detailed
appropriately |
Develops a project charter, but does not include a high-level scope of what is to be accomplished | Does not develop a project charter | 15 |
Project Initiation: High-Level Timeline | Creates a high-level timeline and estimate of cost to complete the project | Creates a high-level timeline and estimate of cost to complete the project, but response contains
inaccuracies |
Does not create a high-level timeline or estimate of cost to complete the project | 15 |
Project Initiation: Key Project Stakeholders | Identifies the concerns of key project internal and external stakeholders | Identifies the concerns of key project internal and external stakeholders, but response either contains
inaccuracies or is overgeneralized |
Does not identify the concerns of key project stakeholders | 10 |
Project Initiation: Support | Compares the level of support from
all key stakeholders to inform the course of action of the project |
Compares the level of support from
all key stakeholders, but discussion contains gaps or inaccuracies |
Does not compare the level of support from all key stakeholders | 15 |
Project Initiation: Stakeholder Analysis
Template |
Completes the stakeholder analysis template | Completes the stakeholder analysis template, but template contains
inaccuracies |
Does not complete the stakeholder analysis template | 10 |
Articulation of Response | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and
articulation of main ideas |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 10 |
Total | 100% |