Special Education Reflection
Question 1: My View
The post offers insight into the arguments of those opposed to special education, with the high cost and ineffective being the critical reasons for the call to dismantle it. The assertions are biased as they only focus more on the adverse outcomes of special education, especially on the cost associated with its implementation, while overlooking its immense benefits to society (Roncaglia, 2018). By arguing that special education takes resources that could be invested in regular education programs, the post adopts a discriminatory approach in justifying the need to scrap the particular education program. The accurate argument is that special education has far more benefits that positively impact the wellness of society. Insight into various benefits will reveal the need to invest more in special education programs to set the foundation for minimal inequalities.
Question 2: Supporting My Argument
Special education is among the most valuable things that people living with disabilities can secure as it acts as an equalizer in the increasingly competitive society. In a typical group learning environment, students living with disabilities often find it hard to compete favorably with others as they are disadvantaged (Roncaglia, 2018). For instance, they find competing favorably with other students on standardized tests hard. As such, special education is instrumental in helping students with disabilities focus on their challenges by quickly revisiting the subjects that have challenging subject matter (Francisco, Hartman, & Wang, 2020). Specialized education also helps students living with disabilities overcome barriers by employing ideal strategies to accurately conceptualize and comprehend various topics and prepare them to advance into more complex learning issues.
Get in touch with us at eminencepapers.com to get your assignment completed by a team of experts.
Besides, special education is instrumental in boosting the self-esteem of students living with disabilities. Exceptional education instructors understand the uniqueness of their student’s needs, which helps the students understand more about the methods that help achieve the desired outcomes. Special education instructors also guide their students on the right approach, thus allowing them to get valuable insight into a deeper understanding of themselves and how their minds function (Roncaglia, 2018). Better learning outcomes and experiences significantly boost the confidence of the students living with disabilities. The trust enables the students to freely ask questions on the key areas that effectively advocate instructional and test-taking methods, thus improving their lifelong learning experiences.
Most noteworthy, special education is instrumental in setting the foundation for increased economic participation in society. By allowing all people to access education and equip them with the requisite knowledge, the community dramatically benefits as the financial burden of dependence on others decreases significantly. A non-discriminatory, educated population actively participates in different economic activities, helping boost society’s overall productivity; increased economic participation is ideal for setting a solid foundation for better wellness. By scraping special education, those with disabilities are disadvantaged as they will lack the required knowledge and skillset to participate in different nation-building economic activities (Amin, 2021). Although the cost of providing special education is high, the long-run benefits far outweigh the investment as economic productivity is boosted in the long run. Thus, one can accurately assert that the post suggesting the scrapping of special education programs fails to accurately evaluate the long-term benefits that accrue to society by investing in the education of people living with disabilities.
Question 3 (a): What would happen If special education were to be disassembled
If special education were to be integrated within regular education without special recognition, the education outcomes in Lovettsville, Virginia, would decline over time. Integrating special education with traditional education will hurt the welfare of the students with special needs as they will not favorably compete with others in a conventional education setting. Optimal education outcomes require that all students be provided with facilities and instructional techniques aligned with their needs (Bin Nordin et al., 2019). Integrating special education with regular education will deny students with disabilities the opportunity to receive instructional methods in line with their unique needs. Denying students with special needs the opportunity to exploit their full potential hurts the overall education outcomes in the long run.
Question 3 (B): What would happen to the children/youth needing specialized support, especially with Covid-19 as an ongoing reality?
The COVID-19 global pandemic necessitates adopting different instructional techniques to achieve the desired ring outcomes among students, and students needing specialized support should have unique instructional methods. With the worldwide pandemic creating a shift to distance learning using digital learning management systems, students with special needs should have individual applications that help them access self-directed learning content (Jameson et al., 2020). The applications will be ideal in assisting them to attain the desired learning outcomes and stay on par with the other students with average learning needs.
References
Amin, F. A. B. M. (2021). A Review Of The Job Satisfaction Theory For Special Education Perspective. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(11), 5224-5228.
Bin Nordin, M. N., Mustafa, M. Z. B., & Razzaq, A. R. B. A. (2019). The Practice of Headmasters’ Leadership and Its Effect on Job Satisfaction of Special Education Integration Program (PPKI) Teachers in Johor, Malaysia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 2008-2014.
Francisco, M. P. B., Hartman, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Inclusion and special education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 238.
Jameson, J. M., Stegenga, S. M., Ryan, J., & Green, A. (2020). <? covid19?> Free Appropriate Public Education in the Time of COVID-19. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 181-192.
Roncaglia, I. (2018). Performing arts: Benefits and potentials within special education and ASCs. Psychological Thought, 11(1).
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
“What is special about special education?… In an effort to justify the specialized, and often expensive and potentially stigmatizing, treatment of students with disabilities, special educators have long sought to address the question of whether their field is truly special and, if so, to specify what those unique and effective characteristics and practices are … Contemporary critiques suggest that special education, among other things, is unnecessarily and unfairly over representative of minority students; grows at a faster rate than the school-age population in general; is expensive, resulting in the redirection of funds away from general education and other programs; uses labels and categories that are without educational merit and result in stigmatization and decreased expectations; creates a double standard, especially in the area of discipline; employs a wait-until-they-fail philosophy; emphasizes process compliance over outcomes; and is generally ineffective …For many critics, dismantling or radically altering special education and IDEA are necessary remedies for a system that ‘is costly and, even worse, ineffective’… However, there is equally little doubt that special education is beneficial and truly special for some students with disabilities…Thus, it appears that the justification of special education hangs in the balance between the validity of its benefits and ‘specialness’ versus the legitimacy of the charges made in regard to the damage it incurs.”
Special Education
After reading the entire quote, weigh in on your level of agreement with this last sentence of the section (“Thus, it appears that the justification of special education hangs in the balance between the validity of its benefits and ‘specialness’ versus the legitimacy of the charges made regarding the damage it incurs.”).
Quote from: an introductory article in a special issue of the Journal of Special Education by Cooke and Schirmer (2003)
Answer each of the following questions in order and number your responses to coincide with each question posed. Include APA citations and a reference section.
1. Briefly explain why you agree, disagree, partially agree, and be specific, listing at least two reasons – using at least three different sites to 3 different references. (identify each reason – for example #1…., #2…). Your response should show stages of analysis, judgment, and application. 12 pts
2. Support your argument using The IDE, which includes two fundamental requirements: the child will receive a free appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment (LRE).
3. a. If special education were to be disassembled (integrated within regular education without special recognition, etc – meaning all kids served by all teachers), what would happen to your local district’s education system? And
b. What would happen to the children/youth needing specialized support, especially now with COVID-19 as an ongoing reality ? 4 pts