Sexuality
Response to Amy Richlin’ Not Before Homosexuality’
Amy Richlin’ Not Before Homosexuality’ partly opposes the historical and constructivist approach to sexuality, as presented by Michel Foucault. Foucault claims that the term homosexuality is an identity category developed in the late 1800s by psychologists. Although Richlin accepts that the perspectives of Foucault and Kenneth Dover influenced the thoughts of historians, the author disagrees with numerous of their views. First, Richlin argues that historians often overlook oppressed prehistoric males who had sexual relations with other men. The article reflects on the extent of these sexuality issues and demonstrates their complexity. Richlin questions the terms to be applied when referring to historical gender structures and the associated concerns of constructivism and essentialism. Besides, the article reflects the everyday use and understanding of the word’ homosexuality.’ The author argues that individuals in the contemporary world should use the term to illustrate the Roman Cinaedus since they were maltreated like modern homosexuals. However, Richlin claims that the term ‘homosexual’ should not refer to Romans who penetrated other males because today’s people slur and disgrace the males whom the past Romans praised. The author emphasizes that it is essential to question whether the application of the term ‘homosexual’ may be perplexing and misrepresentative when referring to pre-modern communities.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Article Response: Amy Richlin’ Not Before Homosexuality’
Please read the article and respond to it.
- The response does not need to be long. The response needs to be straight forward and easily understandable.
Notes:
- Please use your own words when responding to the article.
- Please state what the article is trying to argue just like my classmates. Remember the post does not have to be long.
Sample
In Amy Richlin, “not before homosexuality,“ Michel Focult argues that homosexual was invented in the 1800s and that that word should not be used for the earlier periods. The reason as to why they say that is because during the 1800s is when people started using your sexuality as, “part of a persons essence.” Amy Richlin says, “the term homosexuality is too broad,“ because at that time the person who was the penetrator was praised. The problem is the word homosexual means you had a fixed type which wasn’t the case because at that time it was okay for the males to be attracted to both women and boys.
Amy Richlin’ Not Before Homosexuality’
Sexuality