Response-Balancing Logic and Emotion in Persuasive Arguments

Response-Balancing Logic and Emotion in Persuasive Arguments

Respond to classmate #1:

Thank you for sharing your post. It is well known that emotions affect the decisions we make. Scientists have also shown that without emotions, it becomes difficult to make decisions effectively. Emotions also impact the way teams work. This is the reason why research shows that emotional intelligence is among the strongest predictors of success at work. The biggest challenge arises when emotions and team decision-making come into collision. When it comes to making decisions, it is good to have a little emotion, even when the emotions appear inherently unproductive or unpleasant. It helps to feel a little irritation, sadness, and fear, as this can help ignite motivation or widen the search for alternatives. On the other hand, when emotion is a little too much. It is often bad even when the emotions appear productive and pleasant. When an entire team is feeling confident, excited, or curious, it is likely that they will make a decision that will turn out to be catastrophic. Do you need help with your assignment ? Get in touch with us at eminencepapers.com.

Respond to classmate #2:

Thank you for sharing your post. The power of emotions to influence judgment, including political attitudes, has been recognized from classical antiquity. In Aristotle’s treatise, Rhetoric, he described emotional arousal as very important for persuasion. He points out that “The orator persuades by means of his hearers when they are roused to emotion by his speech; for the judgments we deliver are not the same when we are influenced by joy or sorrow, love or hate.” Based on the social psychology of that time, Edward Bernays, a propaganda theorist, asserted that “in certain cases, we can effect some change in public opinion with a fair degree of accuracy by operating a certain mechanism, just as a motorist can regulate the speed of his car by manipulating the flow of gasoline.” Thus, Bernays suggested that for the masses’ attitudes to be changed, propagandists ought to target their emotions, habits, and impulses and make the emotional currents work at achieving the goal (Huckin, 20116).

Reference

Huckin, T. (2016). Propaganda defined. Propaganda and rhetoric in democracy: History, theory, analysis, 118-136.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

Now that you have a better idea of what kind of arguments appeal to emotions ask yourself whether eliciting emotions in logical arguments is always illegitimate.

Perhaps it is acceptable in some situations to appeal to emotions!

In 200 words, explain why you think eliciting emotions in the listener you are trying to persuade of something true is or is not a good/legitimate strategy you should use.

Respond to classmate #1

Respond to classmate #2