Reflection on a Team Project
The overall effectiveness of the team
The team worked collaboratively in the development of the implementation plan. Group members contributed their opinions, thoughts, and ideas in the brainstorming process. This combined effort facilitated the successful completion of this exercise. One group member worked on the benefits section, the other on the funding, while the remaining two completed the costing section. Despite the varying responsibilities, each member still contributed to the other’s section. For instance, the costing section required all members’ input to ensure logic and viability. In the process, each individual learned more than they knew prior to this assignment. The implementation encountered challenges due to a lack of equal capacities among all group members. The group members all belong to different quartiles in terms of performance. However, the group’s work was not as difficult as expected due to the decision to cooperate. Each member was encouraged to choose sections they could handle with minimal struggle. This approach sets up members for utmost performance in their chosen area. Get in touch with us at eminencepapers.com. We offer assignment help with high professionalism.
Strengths and weaknesses
The main strength of the group’s model is its ability to ensure that each individual handles sections they are confident about. The allowance to choose the most appropriate section allowed all group members to offer their best effort. This ensured that each section was handled thoroughly. In addition, collaboration among members presents a strength due to the need to harmonize information and monitor progress. The collaboration allowed each member to learn from the others and increase their knowledge in different aspects (Satell, 2018). Unfortunately, the model did not challenge group members to handle sections that were a bit unfamiliar to them. Suppose all individuals picked the sections randomly or deliberately chose areas that are challenging. They would have put in more effort and collaborated more with others to ensure they delivered.
To improve the project’s positive impact on the group members, I would ensure that each individual handles the section that they feel less confident about. This approach would ensure that each individual embraces a challenging aspect of the project and learns through the process of completion. This approach is also selected to ensure that members seek out more collaboration from their colleagues for assistance or brainstorming. If I were working on the project independently, I would have included a radius that should identify nearby facilities to ensure that patients can access emergency care immediately. This should be based on the time it takes for a heart condition to escalate into a fatality, which can be judged from the readings that healthcare professionals receive. Thus, the allocation of patients to the nearest facility ensures that their health is well monitored to avoid fatal attacks. The main strategy in bringing the aspect into the project is an assessment of facilities with cardiologists within Phoenix. The maximum arrival time for healthcare professionals would be set at ten minutes in case of the possibility of a fatality. Thus, assigning a patient to a facility within a radius that would consume 10 minutes or less to deliver medical expertise is critical for the intervention’s efficiency.
Teams and teamwork promote innovativeness in a project. Innovation arises from challenges that compel team members to brainstorm and seek potential solutions. While working alone, an individual is restricted to their thoughts, intelligence, and opinions. However, working in teams eliminates such limitations and incorporates more perceptions. This strategy promotes the likelihood of finding a richer solution to the current issue (Bond-Barnard & Fletcher, 2018).
References
Bond-Barnard, T. J., & Fletcher, L. (2018). Linking trust and collaboration in project teams to project management success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2).
Satell, G. (2018). 4 Ways to Build an Innovative Team. Harvard Business Review.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
Reflection on a Team Project
Write a 500-750-word reflection on your team project that addresses the following:
Assess the overall effectiveness of your team. How did the team’s dynamics contribute to both the success and the challenges of creating an implementation plan for your innovation?
Assess the overall effectiveness of the model your team selected to both choose and implement your innovation. What were its strengths and weaknesses?
What would you have done differently if you were working on the project independently? What other potential strategies might be more effective for bringing this particular innovation to fruition in your opinion?
Overall, do you think teams contribute to or hinder innovative thinking and processes? Why?