Reasoned Arguments- Moral Issue- Death Penalty
An Explanation of the Issue
The death penalty is a highly contested moral issue due to its implications for human life and justice. On the one hand, people who support the death penalty contend that it is an appropriate punishment for individuals who commit terrible crimes and can serve as an effective deterrence. However, many who oppose the death penalty claim that it violates the right to life and that it is imposed arbitrarily and unequally, disproportionately harming people of color, minority groups, and those who are poorer and less educated. The debate surrounding the death penalty issue has been ongoing for many years and is unlikely to be resolved soon, as both sides present compelling and valid points.
The Possible Viewpoints and Conclusions
One viewpoint is that the death penalty is an effective form of retribution and justice for heinous crimes and should be used as a deterrent for potential offenders. Supporters argue that the death penalty is an appropriate and necessary punishment for individuals who commit significant crimes, as it removes dangerous offenders from the streets and protects society (Graber, 2019). Another viewpoint from opposers is that the death penalty is an inhumane and immoral punishment that violates the right to life and should be abolished. Opponents of the death penalty argue that it is a cruel and unusual punishment that is applied unfairly and unequally, disproportionately affecting minority groups, people of color, and those who are poorer and less educated. This viewpoint contends that the death penalty does not deter crime or bring justice to victims and their families.
Conclusion: There is no unambiguous agreement on the use of the death sentence, which is a hotly debated moral issue. In contrast to opponents who claim it is cruel and immoral, proponents of the death penalty contend that it is an appropriate and reasonable punishment for individuals who commit horrific crimes.
Clear Statement of Conclusion
The death penalty is a highly contested moral issue, and there is no clear consensus on its use (Kissack, 2019). In contrast to opponents who claim it is cruel and immoral, proponents of the death penalty contend that it is an appropriate and reasonable punishment for individuals who commit horrific crimes. The jury must ultimately decide whether to impose the death penalty, which ought to be reserved for the most severe crimes.
An Explanation of My Conclusion
To reach my conclusion, I conducted thorough research on the morality of the death penalty. I studied both the arguments of proponents and opponents of the death penalty, considering each viewpoint with an open mind. I thought about the arguments in favor of the death penalty, which claim that it is an appropriate and necessary punishment for individuals who commit horrible crimes and that it protects society by getting dangerous offenders off the streets. I also considered the arguments against the death sentence, which contend that it is an unjust and uneven punishment that breaches the right to life. After weighing the pros and drawbacks of the issue, I concluded that the jury should decide whether to impose the death penalty and that it should only be done in extreme circumstances.
Underlying Beliefs That Clashed With the Conclusion
The underlying beliefs that clashed with my conclusion were those that argued that the death penalty should be used in all cases, regardless of the severity of the crime. This viewpoint argued that the death penalty was an effective form of retribution and justice and should be used as a deterrent for potential offenders. On the other hand, the underlying beliefs that supported my conclusion argued that the death penalty should be used only in extreme cases and that the decision should be left up to the jury’s discretion. This viewpoint argues that the death penalty should only be used when it is necessary and should be used in a way that is fair, equitable, and just.
Arguments to Support the Conclusion
The death sentence does not serve as a deterrent to crime is one argument in favor of my view. Research has revealed that states that practice the death sentence have greater rates of violent crime than those that do not. Another argument to support my conclusion is that the death penalty is applied unequally and disproportionately affects minority groups, people of color, and those who are poorer and less educated. This indicates that the death penalty is not applied fairly and, thus, should not be used indiscriminately.
Forming a Reasoned Argument Illustrating the New Belief
A reasoned argument illustrating the belief that the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases and that the decision should be left up to the jury’s discretion can be formed as follows: The death penalty does not deter crime, so using it indiscriminately would be ineffective. According to studies, states that practice the death sentence have greater rates of violent crime than those that do not. According to this, the death penalty may not always act as a deterrent.
References
Graber, R. L. (2019). Is It Acceptable for Juveniles to be Tried as Adults? DigitalCommons@Cedarville. https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/criminal_justice_capstones/1/
Kissack, R. (2019). The EU and Controlling the Use of the Death Penalty: An Organising Principle for Which Fundamental Norm? Norm Research in International Relations, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33238-9_2
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
We’ll write everything from scratch
Question 
In this assignment, you will apply reasoned arguments and personal beliefs to a case study.
Step 1: Consider the scenario:
Amnesty International has recently established a chapter in your area. Residents are encouraged by the organization’s message and good reputation, and everyone is determined to make this local chapter one of the largest in the state. In order to drum up further support, you have volunteered to create content for a group page on an online social network outlining the mission of Amnesty International. Another member suggests that you highlight a case with moral implications that is currently being contested.
Reasoned Arguments- Moral Issue- Death Penalty
Step 2: Research a moral issue.
Use the Internet to research a moral issue. Focus on the specific moral questions being debated as well as the opinions of all sides within the case.
Step 3: Examine a moral case study.
Address the following by creating content for your group page in hopes of attracting new members to your local Amnesty International chapter:
An explanation of the issue
The possible viewpoints and conclusions
A clear statement of your conclusion
An explanation of how you reasoned your way to your conclusions
An explanation of which underlying beliefs clashed with or supported your conclusion
Arguments to support your conclusion
How to form a reasoned argument illustrating the new belief
Remember, you are writing for a wide array of potential members. It is important that you exhibit superior knowledge of the subjects being covered while still packaging the materials in a way that is fun and engaging for new members. They should be excited to join your social network group. Follow these guidelines to further engage the audience:
Use clear, concise sentences.
Use clear and relatable real-world examples to help explain concepts.
Share your enthusiasm and interest in the subject matter.
Relate the material back to your own personal experience when possible.
Step 3: When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place.