Site icon Eminence Papers

Project Plan

Eunice

Project Plan

Project Topic

Alignment to the Program of Study

The DIT program prioritizes the deployment of technological solutions within organizational structures to drive efficiency and employee well-being. This study aligns directly with that mission by focusing on IT professionals—individuals whose daily operations depend heavily on digital tools and whose experiences can reveal both the potential and pitfalls of remote work. Despite 64% of organizations adopting hybrid arrangements, many struggle to achieve consistent outcomes due to the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks (Bélanger et al., 2013): Project Plan.

By synthesizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT; Venkatesh et al., 2003) with the Job Demands Resources model (Hajli et al., 2015), this research promises actionable strategies for refining remote work policies in technology-driven sectors (Allen et al., 2015; Morganson et al., 2010).

The study, “The Impact of Technology Enabled Remote Work on Employee Job Satisfaction and Organizational Outcomes: A Study of IT Professionals in U.S. Based Organizations”, seeks to understand the impact of modern technologies such as virtual collaboration tools (Slack, Zoom) and performance dashboards on employee experience and organizational productivity in the IT industry. Within the context of the DIT (Doctor of Information Technology) framework, this study focuses on the proactive alignment of organizational technology, work processes, and employee productivity and health. (Angelici & Profeta, 2020; Venkatesh et al., 2003).

Today, remote work represents more than just a shift in location; it is a sophisticated blend of human and technological elements. While platforms such as Microsoft Teams and Asana have alleviated some task coordination bottlenecks, infrastructure gaps continue to plague many organizations, leaving them ill-equipped to handle hybrid scenarios (Bélanger et al., 2012).

Furthermore, employees often describe working remotely as enhancing their autonomy and productivity (Ipsen et al., 2021), but at the same time, they face psychosocial burdens ranging from isolation (Cooper & Kurland, 2002) to the blurring of work-life boundaries (De Bloom et al., 2020). By integrating insights from technology adoption and organizational behavior literature, this research seeks to address these operational and human-centred gaps (Golden & Gajendran, 2019; Ipsen et al., 2021).

The nature of work in many industries has changed dramatically with the rapid increase in remote work due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This change has sparked an exploration of how remote working affects job satisfaction, work-related wellness, and productivity within organizations. While remote work is associated with enhanced work-life balance, it impacts job satisfaction both positively and negatively depending on the level of organizational autonomy, support, and the type of work being performed.

The study will aim to capture remote workers from many different organizational contexts to better understand the effects of remote work. This study focuses on job satisfaction since it demonstrates an employee’s satisfaction with their job and is affected by many elements, like their work-life rhythm, autonomy at work, and the general workplace setting (Ali et al., 2023; Yadav & Madhukar, 2024). Remote work is thought to enhance job satisfaction since it comes with flexibility and more control over one’s schedule (Makridis & Schloetzer, 2022), but other studies argue that it can increase work-related stress as a result of disrupted boundaries between work and personal life (Rizwan & Sivasubramanian, 2022).

Other organizational outcomes like voluntary turnover, employee productivity, and well- being also form the core elements of this research (Pabilonia & Redmond, 2024; García- Salirrosas et al., 2023). Understanding how remote work impacts these outcomes is essential for determining the primary factors that foster job satisfaction and organizational productivity during remote work. This is important because it connects with recent developments in the office environment. In knowledge-intensive sectors, remote work is a fundamental feature of modern organizational practices (Atti et al., 2022).

Achieving organizational goals in today’s highly networked world requires understanding the remote work context and the factors that affect job satisfaction in remote work environments to enhance employee productivity, well-being, and retention (Anakpo et al., 2023). This analysis will add to the literature on remote work and help inform organizational frameworks about remote work, employee involvement policies, and work organization in remote and hybrid systems.

Project Problem

Problem to Be Addressed

The general business problem is that organizations implementing remote and hybrid work models often lack a standardized framework to assess how digital collaboration tools and performance monitoring technologies affect employee productivity. (Makridis & Schloetzer, 2022; Pabilonia & Redmond, 2024). The specific business problem is that IT professionals in U.S.-based organizations lack sufficient job autonomy due to limitations in remote collaboration tools, resulting in decreased productivity and misalignment with organizational IT support systems (Doe et al., 2023; Smith & Lee, 2022)

The scholarly literature on remote work suggests that it improves job satisfaction due to flexible hours and autonomy afforded to employees. It also brings challenges such as isolation and problematic work-life boundaries. However, how these factors collectively influence overall employee satisfaction, productivity, and retention in an organization, as well as its outcome, differs from industry to industry, and the type of job is poorly understood.

Some theoretical models, like the Ability, Motivation, Opportunity (AMO) framework, claim remote work affects employee satisfaction through intrinsic as well as extrinsic factors. However, remote work employee satisfaction and organizational outcome integration have received little attention (Yadav & Madhukar, 2024; Rizwan & Sivasubramanian, 2022).

From previously published work, it appears that factors such as autonomy, organizational support, work-life balance, and the nature of tasks performed shape remote work satisfaction (Ali et al., 2023; Drayton, 2024). For instance, autonomous positions, especially in IT and Software Development, tend to report higher satisfaction compared to more supervised roles (Russo et al., 2023). Fewer social contact opportunities can also contribute to lower job satisfaction and an even greater decline in organizational culture (García-Salirrosas et al., 2023; Atti et al., 2022).

Even with the insights these findings highlight, the body of research available is still sparsely scattered. Most studies do not integrate the multifaceted interdependence of individual, organizational, and task factors toward satisfaction within remote working setups.

The lack of integrated detailed models relating to each multifaceted job satisfaction and organizational outcome in remote work settings is a critical gap in the literature. Some research examines autonomy and work-life balance (Kurdy et al., 2023; Flores, 2019); however, there is little understanding of how these factors interact to influence employee satisfaction as well as organizational outcomes like retention and productivity. Additionally, while software development and academia are studied extensively, other sectors are lacking research attention (Capone et al., 2024). This gap in understanding is important because remote work presents different challenges and opportunities for various organizational industries.

Additionally, the surge in remote work, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitates a review of the existing models of job satisfaction and productivity (Elisabetta et al., 2025). Initially, remote work was perceived as a stopgap measure; however, organizations must now embrace the persistent growth of hybrid and fully remote work models. So, it is crucial to analyze the trajectory of remote work, its evolution over time, and its effects on employee job satisfaction and organizational outcomes (Pabilonia & Redmond, 2024).

Target Population and Phenomena

This study targets IT professionals in U.S.-based organizations who have engaged in remote work for at least one year and routinely employ virtual collaboration tools such as Slack, Zoom, and Asana. The primary phenomena of interest include job autonomy—examining how agile methodologies and asynchronous communication foster task flexibility (Lund et al., 2021)—and organizational support, encompassing mental health resources, technical training, and ergonomic home-office provisions (Hajli et al., 2015; Bentley et al., 2016). Work-life balance is also central, with attention to strategies like temporal logging and spatial workspace segregation (Bélanger et al., 2013; Veld et al., 2016).

Recruitment will leverage LinkedIn and professional networks, using screening criteria for roles (e.g., software developers, DevOps engineers) and sector type (pure tech versus tech-driven enterprises).

Gap

Current scholarship often isolates either the technological or psychosocial dimensions of remote work but seldom integrates both. Technocentric investigations evaluate platform usability—focusing on tools like Zoom and Slack—without adequately considering how such tools influence autonomy and support (Ipsen et al., 2021; Allen et al., 2015).

Conversely, psychosocial studies delve into job satisfaction and work-life balance yet overlook the moderating role of data-driven performance metrics (Hajli et al., 2015; Ragu Nathan et al., 2008). Furthermore, many theoretical frameworks originate in non-IT contexts such as healthcare and academia, limiting their applicability to IT’s reliance on real-time collaboration (Angelici & Profeta, 2020; Bailey & Kurland, 2002).

The theoretical contribution aims to fill the gap in the body of knowledge of remote work by developing an integrated framework that considers individual and organizational factors simultaneously. These gaps can be filled by focusing on understanding the drivers of organizational outcomes in remote workplaces, alongside remote work job satisfaction, as in the situation being studied. The phenomenon of remote work is particularly important at this time due to the widespread adoption of remote work across different sectors.

This research seeks to bridge the identified gaps by synthesizing findings from several studies and offering strategic recommendations to enhance employee satisfaction and productivity through effective remote work management. The findings are intended to expand the discourse on post-pandemic work realities and serve as a basis for subsequent investigations into remote work and organizational outcomes.

Finally, although needs-based models of crafting suggest identity integration across work and life domains (De Bloom et al., 2020) and analyses of formal versus informal telework arrangements highlight differential family outcomes (Troup & Rose, 2012), these perspectives have yet to be combined in an IT specific remote work framework.

Supporting Evidence

Research on the relationship between remote work and its impact on an employee’s job satisfaction presents a divergent picture and highlights the complexity of this issue. Some research notes that the autonomy and flexibility of work hours greatly increase job satisfaction in remote positions. For example, Ali et al. (2023) noted that remote workers in flexible roles, especially in knowledge-based industries, derive higher satisfaction from being able to manage their time, place, and even the tools they use within certain parameters. In the same manner, Makridis and Schloetzer (2022) posit that the flexibility associated with remote work improves an employee’s work-life balance, which enhances job satisfaction.

Nonetheless, there exist some enormous gaps in tackling problems associated with remote work, particularly the social isolation and the blurring of personal and work-life boundaries. García-Salirrosas et al. (2023) point out that employees working remotely may suffer from a lack of social exchanges, which, in turn, diminishes their job satisfaction and sense of belonging to the organization. Work-life imbalance is something that Rizwan and Sivasubramanian (2022) have noted, arguing that remote work increases stress levels because it is much more difficult to disconnect from work when working from home due to undefined borders.

Furthermore, organizational structures impact remote work phenomena to a great extent.

Drayton’s research (2024) claims that an organization’s provision of resources, active mental health, and the availability of off-communication support systems aid in the achievement of higher levels of satisfaction relative to work. This is further corroborated by Pabilonia and Redmond (2024), who argue that good organizational policies could help counterpose most of the negative impacts of remote work, such as increased feelings of loneliness and burnout, while enhancing effectiveness.

As highlighted in earlier research, the individual, organizational, and task-related components are critical; however, there is limited literature capturing all these elements into a single cohesive model. The current study aims to fill this gap by incorporating available literature into a comprehensive model that addresses the complexities of remote work.

Primary Orientation

For this study, the primary theoretical underpinning rests on the workplace satisfaction theory and organizational behavior models, centering on the impact of remote work on job satisfaction. This approach analyzes the intra-organizational factors, especially regarding self- regulation, equilibrium between work and life, and support from the organization. To capture both technical and human dimensions, the study employs the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) framework alongside Workplace Satisfaction Theory.

Within the AMO framework, “ability” refers to technical proficiency with remote-work platforms such as GitHub and Jira (Ipsen et al., 2021); “motivation” encompasses engagement through performance analytics and gamified dashboards (Bélanger et al., 2013); and “opportunity” reflects organizational policies that enable flexible scheduling and designated “anchor days” for synchronous collaboration (Lund et al., 2021; Ragu-Nathan et al., 2008).

Workplace Satisfaction Theory, informed by Conservation of Resources (COR) principles, explores how resource gains—via technology- mediated autonomy and support—mitigate burnout and foster well-being (Hajli et al., 2015; Allen et al., 2015). Qualitative interview data will be thematically coded to link specific technological tools—such as AI-driven performance dashboards—to psychosocial outcomes like reduced technostress (Bailey & Kurland, 2002; Allen et al., 2015).

The integration of the (AMO) framework assumes satisfaction is the outcome of the interactions between the employee’s skill and motivation and the opportunity given by the organization to perform and grow within the structure. This theory enables the analysis of the impact remote work has on satisfaction, employing both intrinsic and extrinsic reasons. The shift in the practice of remote work, particularly following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlights the need to reconsider these models within the context of modern employment relations.

As the organization’s outcomes surrounding productivity, retention, and well-being have been interlinked with employee satisfaction, understanding the effects of remote work is vital, and this is why this literature review is needed. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced most organizations to adapt to remote or hybrid working models; however, embracing these frameworks in a manner that promotes employee satisfaction and productivity poses a challenge for many organizations. Bridging the gap in this area of knowledge aims to be addressed in this study by synthesizing available literature on remote work and determining the principal elements that enhance employee satisfaction in these settings.

Efforts to Address the Problem

Research on remote work and employee satisfaction reveals the many aspects that contribute to job satisfaction. As an example, satisfaction with remote work was found to stem from job autonomy, work-life balance, and organizational support. According to Ali et al. (2023) and Yadav and Madhukar (2024), remote employees tend to be more satisfied because they have easier access to their workplaces and spend less time commuting.

Unlike traditional office-based work, remote work offers greater control over working hours. However, alongside this benefit, remote work poses the risk of social isolation, as well as the merging of personal time and work time, which negatively impacts satisfaction and well-being (Rizwan & Sivasubramanian, 2022; García-Salirrosas et al., 2023).

Even with these emerging lines of research, there is still a significant lack of research aimed at understanding the relationship between remote work satisfaction and organizational outcomes, employee retention, productivity, and overall well-being. Increased autonomy correlates with higher satisfaction, but employees in highly supervised environments tend to report lower satisfaction due to the lack of control over their work (Russo et al., 2023). Further, satisfaction influencing the type of tasks performed has been underexplored. While some areas, such as software development, are relatively well understood, other sectors are not (Capone et al., 2024).

This study seeks to address the gap by analyzing the relationship between job autonomy, work-life balance, organizational support, and employee satisfaction and productivity in a remote work context. It attempts to integrate personal, organizational, and task-related determinants of remote work outcomes.

Synthesis of the Evidence

The review of the literature suggests some disparity around the impact that remote work has on employee satisfaction. On the one hand, remote work is seen to enhance job satisfaction because of flexible schedules and increased independence (Makridis & Schloetzer, 2022).

Knowledge workers, including those in software engineering and academic teaching, tend to report high satisfaction levels with remote work (Atti et al., 2022). These industries tend to offer greater autonomy, which significantly impacts job satisfaction (Capone et al., 2024).

On the contrary, some researchers indicate that social isolation, lack of face-to-face contact, and seepage of work-life boundaries contribute to reduced job satisfaction and work performance (Ferrara et al., 2022; García-Salirrosas et al., 2023). Moreover, organizational support is a crucial factor in determining the perception of remote work as positive or negative among employees. Drayton’s (2024) research highlights organizational commitment and mental health support as critical factors enabling the remote work experience to be positive.

There is, however, an absence of literature that integrates all the identified elements, autonomy, support, work-life interplay, and nature of tasks, to develop a holistic framework that examines organizational and employee satisfaction outcomes. This research aims to construct such a framework and subsequently develop strategic guidelines for organizations to improve employee satisfaction and productivity in remote work environments.

Purpose of the Project and Project Questions

Purpose of the Project

The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore how remote work technologies and organizational policies influence job autonomy, work-life balance, and perceived support and how these factors collectively impact job satisfaction and productivity among IT professionals in U.S.-based organizations. The study aims to provide holistic frameworks and models by combining individual, organizational, and task elements to assist organizations in enhancing remote work practices.

The primary research question asks how do IT professionals in remote work environments address job autonomy challenges using remote collaboration tools? An exploratory aim is to develop a preliminary framework for optimizing remote work technologies and policies, informed by the interplay of UTAUT constructs (Venkatesh et al., 2003) and JD R elements (Hajli et al., 2015). This framework will also consider work design perspectives on effective remote work (Wang et al., 2021) and multidimensional well-being approaches (Charalampous et al., 2019).

Relevance in the Return-to-Office (RTO) Era

Despite the shift toward return-to-office mandates in many organizations, IT professionals continue to operate within hybrid or digital-first environments where collaboration tools and performance platforms are integral to daily workflows. As such, understanding how these tools affect job satisfaction and organizational outcomes remains critical for leadership and policy development.

Statement of Primary Question(s)

  1. How do IT professionals address their experiences with remote work technologies, including virtual collaboration tools and performance monitoring platforms, in relation to their organizational support? How do these technological experiences influence their perceptions of job productivity in remote work environments?

Definition of Terms

Ethical Considerations

Ethical rigor will be upheld through strict confidentiality measures, including anonymized data storage with GDPR-compliant encryption protocols (Kniffin et al., 2021). Participants will receive comprehensive informed-consent documents detailing data usage, retention, and withdrawal rights (Morganson et al., 2010). To mitigate sampling bias, the study will employ stratified recruitment to ensure representation across genders, career stages, and ethnic backgrounds (Charalampous et al., 2019; Kossek et al., 2023).

Proposed Project Framework

Methodological Approach

The proposed inquiry will employ a qualitative research design centered on exploring how technology-enabled remote work shapes job satisfaction and organizational outcomes for IT professionals based in the United States. Opting for a qualitative lens reflects a commitment to foregrounding the deeply personal interpretations that workers assign to the digital tools and virtual routines that now define their daily labor. Such an approach stands in contrast to large-scale quantitative surveys, which often reduce that rich subjectivity to a single score or index.

To guide the investigation, phenomenology is enlisted as the primary strategy because it systematically asks what an experience feels like rather than how common it is. The model, as outlined by Creswell (2013), directs researchers to honor participants’ own descriptions and to treat those descriptions as primary evidence. Based on that foundation, semi-structured interviews will serve as the main data-collection instrument, allowing subjects to narrate their encounters with remote-work technologies in their own words while still providing the team with a core set of prompts to ensure comparability across cases.

The methodological choice rests on two robust theoretical pillars. First, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), now nearly two decades old, guides inquiries into how willingness to embrace a particular system translates into daily productivity and overall morale (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Complementing it is the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) schema, which inventories workplace pressures against the buffers available, be they cutting-edge software or proactive managerial backing (Hajli et al., 2015). Together, the pair offers a well-rounded lens for examining whether and how digital infrastructure lifts or dampens satisfaction, output, and related yardsticks in fully remote set-ups.

Population and Sample

The focal group for the research consists of information technology specialists who operate remotely for U.S. firms. Eligible respondents must have logged at least 12 months outside a traditional office and routinely navigate platforms like Slack, Zoom, or Teams alongside oversight tools such as Asana. This segment was chosen because IT roles are tightly woven into the digital fabric of work life, making them especially revealing for examining how the very tools they live by influence job contentment and broader organizational health.

A purposive sampling strategy will identify participants who meet three core conditions: demonstrated experience with remote work, habitual use of online collaboration tools, and employment in roles that demand sustained interaction with networked technologies-software developers, IT managers, network engineers, and similar technical staff. Limiting recruitment to these criteria ensures the sample directly reflects the lived realities of information technology workers operating outside a conventional office. Between 15 and 20 respondents will be enlisted, a number that sits comfortably within qualitative research conventions and permits both thematic breadth and analytical depth.

Constructs, Phenomena, Variables

The inquiry revolves around three core constructs: job autonomy, organizational support, and work-life balance. All are known to influence how technical staff experience telecommuting, and each will be examined alongside the suite of remote work technologies that underpin their daily tasks. Through this prism, the research seeks to clarify how those technologies either bolster or hinder employee satisfaction and overall productivity when commuting becomes a matter of logging into a VPN instead of crossing town.

Firstly, job autonomy describes how much latitude an employee has to shape their own tasks, set their timetable, and choose the tools of the trade. Software developers and system engineers tend to occupy positions where that freedom is pronounced since coding problems rarely yield to rigid supervision. Yet the remote platforms a firm supplies can either amplify that independence or corrode it and that gap in experience looms large in the present research.

Secondly, organizational support is the safety net an employer weaves underneath the day-to-day decisions. Broadband reimbursements, therapy apps, home-desk stipends, and a few well-timed upskilling workshops can turn a makeshift kitchen-table set-up into a command post. When a systems analyst connects from hundreds of miles away, the company’s readiness to cover those essentials often makes the difference between smooth sailing and constant crisis.

Lastly, work-life balance is the everyday juggling act of honoring project deadlines while also keeping family dinners and weekend chores in the picture. Telecommuting claims its share of daylight, and the borders between office alerts and evening quiet can fade until they are almost invisible. Pinpointing how engineers use software signals and personal habits to redraw those borders is, therefore, a fundamental question for this study.

The investigation will draw on two complementary frameworks. The UTAUT model will look into performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence to determine why individuals embrace or hesitate to adopt new digital tools. The JD-R framework, in contrast, will look straight at the tug-of-war between job demands—such as the relentless ping of messaging apps—and the resources organizations put on the table, from ergonomic stipends to emotional support, to keep workers healthy and effective (Hajli et al., 2015).

Proposed Data Sources

Data for the inquiry will come primarily from semi-structured interviews with IT professionals who log in from home or a co-working space. Talking one-on-one lets each person narrate the rhythm of their day and gauge how the latest video-call platform nudges or frustrates their sense of satisfaction, output, and balance between office hours and personal time. Conversations will be held over Zoom or a standard phone line. This arrangement keeps the set-up low-pressure, giving participants a chance to mull their thoughts in an environment that feels both familiar and unobtrusive.

A detailed interview protocol will be crafted in close alignment with the guiding research questions, deliberately incorporating elements of the UTAUT model and the JD-R framework. Each question set will specifically probe themes of employee autonomy, perceived organizational support, work-life equilibrium, and the everyday use of digital technologies.

All sessions will be audio-recorded with participant consent and subsequently transcribed word-for-word to preserve the original discourse. To augment these verbal accounts, respondents will be invited to keep brief written reflections on their remote-work experiences; these notes are expected to enrich the contextual fabric of the study and deepen analytic insight.

Measures or Artifacts to Be Reviewed

The core tools deployed in this investigation will be semi-structured interview protocols crafted to elicit rich narratives about everyday encounters with remote work platforms. Each schedule will favor open-ended prompts so that respondents may chart their own pathways through the material. Some sample questions may include:

In addition to the interviews, participants will keep informal written reflections—journals or short notes—recording how technology fits or disrupts their routines and how they shepherd the border between paid hours and personal time. When coded, these texts will be paired with interview transcripts in order to build a thicker, multi-voiced portrait of contemporary remote work experience.

Detailed Procedures

The study will begin with the careful identification and recruitment of participants, a task that hinges largely on platforms such as LinkedIn and niche professional forums where many information technology workers congregate. Each potential respondent will be screened against the inclusion criteria before being approached. Once a match is confirmed, the selected individual will receive an email containing a digital informed-consent document that explains the project’s purpose, describes the planned data collection methods, and reaffirms the participant’s right to withdraw at any stage without incurring any form of penalty.

After obtaining consent, a semi-structured interview will be scheduled for a window of approximately 45 to 60 minutes. Participants may choose to meet via Zoom or, if bandwidth is a concern, the more traditional telephone. Each session is expected to be audio-recorded (quite openly and with explicit permission) so that a verbatim transcript can later be produced.

To complement the spoken exchange, respondents will be invited to write a brief reflection or journal entry about their remote work experience. This follow-up task is intended to capture any insights that arise after the interview has closed, and it must be submitted within one week to preserve the freshness of their thoughts.

Participant information will be scrubbed from every file, and all recordings, transcripts, and field notes will rest on hardware protected by full-disk encryption. The texts will then be sifted for recurring motifs related to job autonomy, the visibility of organizational support, and the persistent negotiation of work-life balance.

Validity/Reliability/Credibility/Dependability

To ensure the trustworthiness of the study, several strategies will be employed:

Proposed Data Collection

Sampling Strategy, Number of Participants

The research will employ purposive sampling to target individuals whose day-to-day work aligns closest with the questions being asked. IT professionals who have logged at least 12 months of remote duty and lean on tools such as Zoom, Slack, and Teams will form the study population. A roster of 15 to 20 respondents is envisioned; that range is well-documented in qualitative literature as large enough to reach thematic saturation but still manageable for hands-on analysis. Limiting the sample in that way encourages a deep, conversational examination of each participant’s lived experience rather than an uneven headache of spreadsheets and transcripts.

Recruitment Procedures

Outreach will begin on LinkedIn, where a brief notice will invite potential volunteers to step forward. Personal contacts will also be tapped, and each enlisted participant will be asked to pass the call along to colleagues who meet the criteria. Inclusion hinges on two straightforward rules: candidates must work from home full-time for at least one year, and they must use at least one cloud-based collaboration platform on a weekly basis. The study will steer clear of respondents who have never left the office or who seldom interact over digital channels since their experiences would not speak directly to the central research problem.

Data Collection Process

Recruitment will begin with a modest outreach on LinkedIn and within a handful of relevant professional circles. Once potential participants express interest, each one will receive a plain-language explanation of the study and a request for informed consent. Signed authorization will confirm that they understand their rights and the uses to which their data will be put.

After consent is secured, semi-structured interviews will be scheduled for either Zoom or a standard phone line, depending on each individual’s comfort. During those conversations, subjects will be invited to discuss their day-to-day experiences with remote work, and notes may also be prompted by brief written reflections they submit afterward.

The session audio will be recorded and then transcribed word for word so no nuance is lost. Every interviewee will receive that transcript so they may correct or clarify anything they choose. Data will be analyzed through thematic coding, allowing patterns of meaning to emerge from the full body of narratives.

Ethical Considerations

Participation begins only after informed consent, at which point subjects are advised they may withdraw from the study without penalty and skip any questions that feel intrusive. All identifying information will be stripped from transcripts prior to analysis, and final reports will present findings in aggregated forms to prevent back-tracing. Audio files and consent forms will be encrypted and stored separately from demographic information, minimizing any risk of exposure should a breach occur. Since the topics of job satisfaction and work-life balance are sensitive, interviewees will be repeatedly assured they control the interview pace and scope.

Proposed Data Analysis Plan

The data set will be subjected to thematic analysis, a flexible technique adept at surfacing recurrent patterns and ideas in qualitative material. By sorting transcripts this way, the investigator hopes to pinpoint how IT staff encounter remote work platforms and what those encounters say about job autonomy, organizational backing, and the often blurry line between professional and personal time.

Inductive coding will open the process; phrases, anecdotes, and fragments that speak directly to the guiding questions will be grouped as they emerge. Once clustering is complete, the data will be categorized into major themes, including how digital instruments tilt job satisfaction, the role of managerial support for work-life balance, and the degree to which autonomy over daily tasks correlates with sustained productivity.

References

Ali, A. D., Narine, L. K., Hill, P. A., & Bria, D. C. (2023). Factors affecting remote workers’ job satisfaction in Utah: An exploratory study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(9), 5736. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20095736

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

Anakpo, G., Nqwayibana, Z., & Mishi, S. (2023). The impact of work-from-home on employee performance and productivity: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(5), 4529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054529

Angelici, M., & Profeta, P. (2020). Smart-working: Work flexibility without constraints. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556304

Atti, C., Cross, C., Dogan, A. B., Hubbard, C., Page, C., Montague, S., & Rabieinejad, E. (2022). Impacts and integration of remote-first working environments. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2209.04383

Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144

Bélanger, F., Watson-Manheim, M. B., & Swan, B. R. (2013). A multi-level socio-technical systems telecommuting framework. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12), 1257-1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.705894

Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T. T., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016). The role of organizational support in teleworker well-being: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 52, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019

Capone, V., Schettino, G., Marino, L., Camerlingo, C., Smith, A., & Depolo, M. (2024). The new normal of remote work: Exploring individual and organizational factors affecting work-related outcomes and well-being in academia. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340094

Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2018.1541886

Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.145

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

De Bloom, J., Vaziri, H., Tay, L., & Kujanpää, M. (2020). An identity-based integrative needs model of crafting: Crafting within and across life domains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(12), 1423–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000495

Drayton, E. (2024). Assessing the influence of remote work on corporate culture and productivity. Journal of the American Institute, 1(1), 6–10. https://americanjournal.us/index.php/american/article/view/4

Elisabetta, C., Paola, R., Maran, D. A., Filippetti, S., Marco, P., Pellegrino, E., Ferrante, M., Giuseppe, L. T., & Fiore, M. (2025). Remote workers’ life quality and stress during COVID-19: A systematic review. European Journal of Public Health, 35(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae167

Ferrara, B., Pansini, M., De Vincenzi, C., Buonomo, I., & Benevene, P. (2022). Investigating the role of remote working on employees’ performance and well-being: An evidence-based systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912373

Flores, M. F. (2019). Understanding the challenges of remote working and its impact on workers. International Journal of Business Marketing and Management (IJBMM), 4(11), 40-44. http://ijbmm.com/paper/Nov2019/824043604.pdf

García-Salirrosas, E. E., Rondon-Eusebio, R. F., Geraldo-Campos, L. A., & Acevedo-Duque, Á. (2023). Job satisfaction in remote work: The role of positive spillover from work to family and work-life balance. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110916

Golden, T. D., & Gajendran, R. S. (2019). Unpacking the role of a telecommuter’s job in their performance: Examining job complexity, problem solving, interdependence, and social support. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9530-4

Hajli, M., Sims, J. M., & Ibragimov, V. (2015). Information technology (IT) productivity paradox in the 21st century. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2012-0129

Ipsen, C., Van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041826

Kadoura, A., & Small, E. P. (2022). Tracking Productivity in Real-time Using Computer Vision. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1218, No. 1, p. 012041). IOP Publishing.

Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., . . . Van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716

Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M. B., & Lautsch, B. A. (2023). Work-life flexibility policies from a boundary control and implementation perspective: A review and research framework. Journal of Management, 49(6), 2062–2108. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221140354

Kurdy, D. M., Al-Malkawi, H. N., & Rizwan, S. (2023). The impact of remote working on employee productivity during COVID-19 in the UAE: The moderating role of job level. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 3(4), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbsed-09-2022-0104

Lomas, C., Burke, M., & Page, C. L. (2008). Collaboration tools. Educause learning initiative, 2(11).

Lu, Z., Wang, S., Li, Y., Liu, X., & Olsen, W. (2023). Who gains mental health benefits from work autonomy? The roles of gender and occupational class. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 18(4), 1761-1783.

Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., Smit, S., Ellingrud, K., & Robinson, O. (2021, February 18). The future of work after COVID-19. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-after-covid-19

Makridis, C., & Schloetzer, J. D. (2022). Does working from home increase job satisfaction and retention? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper, 4016657. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4016657

Mohite, M. D., & Kulkarni, R. V. (2019). Job satisfaction factors of employee in virtual workplace: Review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470. https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd23059.pdf

Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M., & Heelan, M. P. (2010). Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work‐life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011056941

Pabilonia, S. W., & Redmond, J. J. (2024). The rise in remote work since the pandemic and its impact on productivity. Beyond the Numbers: Productivity, 13(8). https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-13/remote-work-productivity.htm

Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165

Raj, R., Kumar, V., Sharma, N. K., Singh, S., Mahlawat, S., & Verma, P. (2023). The study of remote working outcome and its influence on firm performance. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100528.

Rizwan, M., & Sivasubramanian, C. (2022). Remote work and employee well-being: The blurred work-life boundaries. Asian Journal of Management and Commerce, 3(1), 137–146. https://www.allcommercejournal.com/archives/2022.v3.i1.C.122

Russo, D., Hanel, P. H., Altnickel, S., & van Berkel, N. (2023). Satisfaction and performance of software developers during enforced work from home in the COVID-19 pandemic. Empirical Software Engineering, 28(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10293-z

Troup, C., & Rose, J. (2012). Working from home: Do formal or informal telework arrangements provide better work–family outcomes? Community Work & Family, 15(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2012.724220

Veld, M., Van Der Heijden, B. I., & Semeijn, J. H. (2016). Home-to-work spillover and employability among university employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(8), 1280–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-09-2015-0347

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290

Yadav, P., & Madhukar, D. V. (2024). Impact of remote work on employee well-being conceptual perspective. International Journal of Management (IJM), 15(2), 96-107. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID4808518_code6685932.pdf?abstractid=4808518&mirid=1&type=2

Zhou, E. (2020). The “too-much-of-a-good-thing” effect of job autonomy and its explanation mechanism. Psychology, 11(2), 299-313.

Zychová, K., Fejfarová, M., & Jindrová, A. (2024). Job autonomy as a driver of job satisfaction. Central European Business Review, 13(2), 117.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 

Week 10 DIT 8926 instructions

Overview

Your final assignment is focused on the plan’s proposed project framework, data collection, and ethical considerations.

Instructions

Remember to update the reference list as you add resources to support your project development.

Use your Project Plan Template and guide to complete the following:

Proposed Project Framework

Your project framework should be clearly defined and include population, foundations, phenomena, and variables. The framework consists of three elements:

Data Collection

Ethical Considerations

Include in-text citations and a references section at the end of your assignment.

Additional Requirements

Review the rubric before submitting your assignment to ensure that you meet all criteria.

To support you in proofreading your assignments, ensure you use Microsoft EditorLinks to an external site. to help correct errors with grammar, usage, and writing mechanics.

To strengthen your writing, use the Turnitin results to revise your work before submitting for grading.

Reference

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

Exit mobile version