Site icon Eminence Papers

NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template

NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template

CC (chief complaint): “After taking propranolol, I’ve been experiencing lightheadedness and dizziness. Auvelity also produced upset stomach and nausea.”

HPI:

NE is a 46-year-old female who presents for evaluation of side effects from medications, including dizziness and lightheadedness stemming from propranolol and nausea/upset stomach related to Auvelity; she had been taking this medication almost weekly until discontinuing. NE also stated in her history that she had several thoracic aortic aneurysms, and her Spravato treatment has been paused until cardiology clearance. She is already maintained on Cymbalta for the depression, while a follow-up test on the aneurysm is scheduled for November. Of current concern is the management of depressive and anxiety symptoms without further adverse effects on her physical health.”

Past Psychiatric History:

Substance Current Use and History: NE denies the use of alcohol, tobacco, or any illicit drugs. She drinks coffee occasionally but does not use it excessively.

Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: NE’s mother was treated with medication for her history of depression. There is no family history of substance abuse or psychiatric hospitalizations.

Psychosocial History: NE was born and raised in a small town and is the oldest of three siblings. She has two children and has been married for 15 years. NE was an office manager but reported that the depressive and anxiety symptoms have significantly impacted productivity and ability to function at work and home. NE completed a bachelor’s degree in business administration. She enjoys reading and cooking in her free time.

Medical History: Treatment decisions for NE’s thoracic aortic aneurysm are pending cardiology clearance, and the patient is under observation.

ROS:

Physical exam: None at the moment

Diagnostic results: Not done

Assessment

Mental Status Examination:

NE appears to be her stated age, is neatly groomed, and has an appropriate appearance. She is “down,” and her affect matches her mood. Speech is typical in volume and rate and is coherent. Thought processes are goal-oriented and logical. No hallucinations, delusions, or other signs of psychosis are present. She refutes any suicidal or homicidal ideation. Insight and judgment are intact. NE is fully oriented to time, place, and person. Memory (recent and remote) and concentration are intact.

Differential Diagnoses:

  1. F33.2 Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Severe without Psychotic Features:
    NE’s long-standing history of major depressive disorder (MDD), coupled with current symptoms such as low mood, fatigue, anhedonia, and difficulty concentrating, points to this as the primary diagnosis. The persistence of these symptoms without psychotic features aligns closely with the DSM-5-TR criteria for this diagnosis. NE has been treated for MDD for many years, and her symptoms have fluctuated in severity, with her current medication (Cymbalta) helping to manage them but not fully alleviating her depressive episodes (Marx et al., 2023).
  2. F40.01 Agoraphobia with Panic Disorder:
    NE has a well-documented history of agoraphobia, which presents as severe anxiety in crowded or open spaces, leading to avoidance behaviors. She experiences panic attacks in these situations, characterized by palpitations, shortness of breath, and overwhelming fear (Shin et al., 2020). This condition has weakened her capability to function in public spaces and meets the diagnostic criteria necessary from the DSM-5-TR for agoraphobia with panic disorder.
  3. F41.0 Panic Disorder (without Agoraphobia):
    Other than agoraphobia, NE also describes panic attacks in places that have no connection with this definition or massive open space and specifies that besides agoraphobia, NE has a panic disorder. These attacks are defined mainly by the features of their development, such as an acute sense of dizziness, palpitations, and the fear of losing control; attacks correspond to the criteria for panic disorder without agoraphobia, according to DSM-V (Papola et al., 2021).

Primary Diagnosis:

Reflections:

In a similar evaluation, I would place a greater emphasis on continuous, close monitoring of the patient’s medication side effects, particularly in cases where the patient has a complex medical history, such as NE’s thoracic aortic aneurysm. This would include more frequent follow-up appointments to assess the patient’s response to medication adjustments. Additionally, I would consider collaborating more actively with the patient’s cardiologist to ensure that the psychiatric treatment plan does not interfere with her cardiovascular condition.

In NE’s case, one important social determinant of health is access to healthcare services. Per Healthy People 2030, access to timely and appropriate healthcare, including specialty services such as cardiology and psychiatric care, is essential for optimal health outcomes (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2020). NE’s delayed access to cardiology services has affected her ability to continue Spravato treatment, which has been a crucial part of her depression management. This underscores the importance of ensuring that patients with complex medical needs can access all necessary services without delays to avoid gaps in care.

Health Promotion Activity

As a future advanced provider, I would recommend engaging NE in regular physical activity as a health promotion activity. Exercise has been shown to improve mood and decrease symptoms of depression and anxiety (Smith & Merwin, 2021). Since NE is already on a pharmacological regimen, incorporating a structured exercise program would complement her treatment plan by improving both her physical and mental well-being.

Patient Education Consideration

One patient education consideration for NE would be informing her about the importance of adherence to follow-up appointments with both psychiatric and cardiology providers. Explaining the significance of coordination between her mental and physical health treatments can empower NE to prioritize and seek care promptly, thus reducing potential health disparities and avoiding worsening her conditions (Singh et al., 2022). Encouraging her to take an active role in managing both her psychiatric and physical health will contribute to improved health outcomes and reduce the risk of complications.

Critical Thinking Reflection

This case demonstrates the importance of viewing psychiatric conditions through a holistic lens, particularly when dealing with patients who have significant medical comorbidities. Balancing psychiatric and medical treatments, such as NE’s depression and her aneurysm, requires careful consideration to avoid adverse effects and ensure optimal health outcomes. Moving forward, ensuring that healthcare systems are better integrated and more accessible will be key to reducing inequities and improving patient outcomes in psychiatric care.

PRECEPTOR VERIFICATION:

I confirm the patient used for this assignment is a patient that was seen and managed by the student at their Meditrek approved clinical site during this quarter course of learning.

Preceptor signature: ________________________________________________________

Date: ________________________

References

Bains, N., & Abdijadid, S. (2023, April 10). Major depressive disorder. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559078/

Marx, W., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Solmi, M., Furukawa, T. A., Firth, J., Carvalho, A. F., & Berk, M. (2023). Major depressive disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00454-1

Papola, D., Ostuzzi, G., Tedeschi, F., Gastaldon, C., Purgato, M., Del Giovane, C., Pompoli, A., Pauley, D., Karyotaki, E., Sijbrandij, M., Furukawa, T. A., Cuijpers, P., & Barbui, C. (2021). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 221(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2021.148

Shin, J., Park, D.-H., Ryu, S.-H., Ha, J. H., Kim, S. M., & Jeon, H. J. (2020). Clinical implications of agoraphobia in patients with panic disorder. Medicine, 99(30). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021414

Singh, V., Kumar, A., & Gupta, S. (2022). Mental Health Prevention and Promotion—a Narrative Review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.898009

Smith, P. J., & Merwin, R. M. (2021). The Role of Exercise in Management of Mental Health Disorders: An Integrative Review. Annual Review of Medicine, 72(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-060619-022943

US Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Access to Health Services . Healthy People 2030. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health/literature-summaries/access-health-services

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

We’ll write everything from scratch

Question 


Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation and Patient, Video Case Presentation

For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined during the last 3 weeks, using the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient. Be sure to incorporate any feedback you received on your Week 3 and Week 6 case presentations into this final presentation for the course.

To Prepare

Assignment
Record yourself presenting the complex case for your clinical patient.

Do not sit and read your written evaluation! The video portion of the assignment is a simulation to demonstrate your ability to succinctly and effectively present a complex case to a colleague for a case consultation. The written portion of this assignment is a simulation for you to demonstrate to the faculty your ability to document the complex case as you would in an electronic medical record. The written portion of the assignment will be used as a guide for faculty to review your video to determine if you are omitting pertinent information or including non-essential information during your case staffing consultation video.

In your presentation:

By Day 7

Note: In Week 9: Assignment 2, Part 2 you will submit two (2) files for the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including a Word document and scanned PDF/images of the completed assignment signed by your Preceptor.

NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template

NRNP/PRAC 6635 Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template

Client’s Notes:

Resources:

Exit mobile version